Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Stiffening trailing arms, Anyone done anything like this?
John
post Oct 31 2010, 12:24 PM
Post #1


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



I'm considering strengthening the trailing arms.

I have looked at the steel plates people add to wrap around the stock trailing arms and I can understand that this may increase the strength of the trailing arm some, but the weight it adds seems counter-productive and a band-aid solution at best.

I know that this is how dad did it and it's been working pretty good up until now, but I keep thinking there might be a better way.

My idea after looking at my trailing arms for the better part of the last 2 days is to add some stiffeners through the arm box similar to the tube running through the arms to access the inner brake pad adjuster.


The tube is welded to both sides of the box and would serve to keep the two sides from deflecting. This is a brace, and would stiffen the tube member significantly without adding much weight.

I'm thinking the addition of 2 additional tubes would decrease deflection more than the plate stiffeners and will be no where near the weight.

Anyone else think this?

I'm sure in the last 40 or so years, someone else has had this same idea.

I would love to see some pictures or see some results (I hate to reinvent the wheel if I don't have to)


Thanks for reading.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Oct 31 2010, 01:05 PM
Post #2


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,639
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(John @ Oct 31 2010, 11:24 AM) *
I'm sure in the last 40 or so years, someone else has had this same idea.

Many times in fact. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

I know of tubing added vertically and horizontally as far back as 20 years ago. I'm sure people have done it even earlier.
It's a simply way to add strength without cutting the whole thing apart.

Racer Chris did some with added plates, there's a thread here somewhere.
And i believe Eric Shea offered the arms with additional tubes at one point.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
burton73
post Oct 31 2010, 01:48 PM
Post #3


burton73
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,524
Joined: 2-January 07
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 7,414
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Oct 31 2010, 12:05 PM) *

QUOTE(John @ Oct 31 2010, 11:24 AM) *
I'm sure in the last 40 or so years, someone else has had this same idea.

Many times in fact. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

I know of tubing added vertically and horizontally as far back as 20 years ago. I'm sure people have done it even earlier.
It's a simply way to add strength without cutting the whole thing apart.

Racer Chris did some with added plates, there's a thread here somewhere.
And i believe Eric Shea offered the arms with additional tubes at one point.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)


Eric Shea did the trailing arms on number 41 with tubes just like that. Sorry but I do not have a picture of the arms at home.

Bob Burton
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Oct 31 2010, 02:00 PM
Post #4


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,275
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Some pics of the process. This adds only ounces and really stiffens the arms. More so than the factory kits.

First, 1" holes are milled into the arms. The pattern is triangulated off the original inner adjuster tube for the stock handbrake:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net-1110-1288555214.1.jpg)

Here you can see a test fit of a 1" steel tube through the arm:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net-1110-1288555215.2.jpg)

The next step (not shown yet) is to have the arms media blasted to bare metal:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net-1110-1288555215.3.jpg)

Once we have fresh metal to weld with, the tubes are welded into place and trimmed. After the welding the entire arm goes into powder coating:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net-1110-1288555215.4.jpg)

Prototype gussets should help shaft tube flex:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net-1110-1288555216.5.jpg)

Sneak peak on the car:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net-1110-1288555217.6.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gothspeed
post Oct 31 2010, 06:23 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,539
Joined: 3-February 09
From: SoCal
Member No.: 10,019
Region Association: None



I like it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) !!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John
post Oct 31 2010, 09:02 PM
Post #6


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



Perfect!

Thanks Eric!

The pictures are great. Thanks a bunch.

I spent the past 2 hours looking through 5 year old threads where Chris added a bulkhead sheet metal stiffener then went through 5 or more pages of FEA that may or may not have supported any stiffness increase.

I still think this has to strengthen the arms without adding much work or weight (regardless of the neigh-Sayers).



You wouldn't have any dimensions for the triangular gusset plates do you? (now I'm being real lazy).

Thanks again.




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
strawman
post Oct 31 2010, 09:44 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 881
Joined: 25-January 08
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 8,624
Region Association: Central California



I've done it; go to post #98 at http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?act...f=2&t=83031
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Oct 31 2010, 10:38 PM
Post #8


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,275
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Stats I heard were 50%for these.

I don't have the measurements for the gussets but I think RonS had a drawing that may help. Easy to eye up otherwise.

E.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RJMII
post Oct 31 2010, 11:11 PM
Post #9


Jim McIntosh
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,125
Joined: 11-September 07
From: Sandy, Utah
Member No.: 8,112
Region Association: None



QUOTE(strawman @ Oct 31 2010, 09:44 PM) *



link to post 98: http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...3031&st=80#
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Spoke
post Nov 1 2010, 05:15 AM
Post #10


Jerry
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,978
Joined: 29-October 04
From: Allentown, PA
Member No.: 3,031
Region Association: None



I strengthened the rear trailing arms by inserting 3/8 inch rods at diagonals in 2 places.

Drilling the holes:

Attached Image

Holes Drilled

Attached Image

Finished product:

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post Nov 1 2010, 02:12 PM
Post #11


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



Spoke - thanks for sharing (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
I had not seen this version yet...what do the gurus have to say?
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dflesburg
post Nov 1 2010, 02:26 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,720
Joined: 6-April 04
From: Warm and Cheerful Centerville Ohio
Member No.: 1,896
Region Association: None



totally tubular dudes!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sixaddict
post Nov 1 2010, 02:43 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 801
Joined: 22-January 09
From: Panama City Beach, FL
Member No.: 9,961
Region Association: South East States



I have a set that have external triangulated tube for strength done by race shop from Eastern PA. Would be happy to send photos although I would need to take them.PM your address as I can never get photos posted.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Nov 1 2010, 03:15 PM
Post #14


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Chris, I had a similar idea to Spoke, but never followed through. I think it would be beneficial, although I would keep an eye out for stress cracks. The welds on the end of the rod are small compared to the welds on the tube method.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Nov 1 2010, 08:41 PM
Post #15


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,925
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(John @ Oct 31 2010, 11:02 PM) *

... looking through 5 year old threads where Chris added a bulkhead sheet metal stiffener then went through 5 or more pages of FEA ...

Regardless of my friend's FEA work,
my empirical test data totally supports the fact that adding a single bulkhead gives a substantial torsional stiffness increase.
Thats why it's part of all the Upgraded Trailing Arms we sell.

I'm sure welding a 1" tube crosswise through a trailing arm adds stiffness but the real value there is that its easy to do.

I'm a little doubtful of the 3/8" rod method.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John
post Nov 1 2010, 09:51 PM
Post #16


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Racer Chris @ Nov 1 2010, 06:41 PM) *

QUOTE(John @ Oct 31 2010, 11:02 PM) *

... looking through 5 year old threads where Chris added a bulkhead sheet metal stiffener then went through 5 or more pages of FEA ...

Regardless of my friend's FEA work,
my empirical test data totally supports the fact that adding a single bulkhead gives a substantial torsional stiffness increase.
Thats why it's part of all the Upgraded Trailing Arms we sell.

I'm sure welding a 1" tube crosswise through a trailing arm adds stiffness but the real value there is that its easy to do.

I'm a little doubtful of the 3/8" rod method.



That's just what my wife and I are discussing right now. We're both engineers.

While the 3/8" rod method may add some stiffness, the bulkhead or plate would offer the greatest resistance to collapsing of the tube in twisting, and the 1" tubing would offer some benefit with the ease of installation (don't have to cut the tube in half to install).



I'm going with inserting (2) 1" tubes as this makes the most sense to me and is light weight. (and doesn't introduce a bunch of heat into the part).



Thanks for responding Chris. (Your input probably means the most as it was you doing the empirical testing way back...)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 09:50 AM