Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> AX this weekend with "new" set up, Kumho Victoracers & 250# springs
Joseph Mills
post Apr 23 2004, 12:41 PM
Post #1


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



With new Kumhos & 250# rear springs, once again I'll be going out onto an AX course driving a "new" car (which I haven't learned to drive yet). Someday the mods & changes will stop (right?).

I know that driving style, car setup, etc. all affect tire pressures, but, for those of you that are experienced with Kumho Victoracers, what air pressures have you found to work for our cars (go in a higher or lower direction)?

The Kumho instructions aren't real clear. They give a 35-40# pressure range and then go on to say if your car is light & well balanced, you may want to use LOWER settings. Do they mean 35# instead of 40#? Or do they mean to go LOWER than 35# - like maybe 30-32#????

The 250# springs, finally, seem to be helping the car to rotate nicely in turns. Anymore rotation could easily end up becoming 180 degrees of rotation. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 23 2004, 12:54 PM
Post #2


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



I ran 26-28 psi cold in the Vracers.....then didn't let it go over 30.

Sure, someday the mods & changes will stop.....does that make feel better? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Apr 23 2004, 01:39 PM
Post #3


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,624
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I'm with JP on this too.. but my experience is not on autox... only on tracks...

I ran 225 victoracers and 250 rear springs..
on a race track we would usually run around 26-28 range.... couldn't get grip out of them over 30lbs...

usually same pressure front and rear... sometimes I'd end up with 1lb extra in the rear.. but more likely than not the same...


of course I don't know how that applies to autox
brant
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Apr 23 2004, 01:52 PM
Post #4


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,300
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



Joseph, Bring them to Hallett next weekend and run with me. I'm doing the novice DE thing. Should be a blast.

Curt
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Apr 23 2004, 01:59 PM
Post #5


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



Wow! Inflation pressure of 28 pounds?

Hey, you guys aren't playing a joke on me are ya? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

I was going to start a 40 and keep dropping down to the low 30's.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 23 2004, 02:04 PM
Post #6


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



OK, remember, this is your fault. This pic has seen the rounds, but they are V racers with 26/28 f-r.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Apr 23 2004, 02:09 PM
Post #7


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,624
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I've had a bit of experience running heavy cars.. and we used to use 34lbs and up on a 944 turbo.. (3000lbs)

but on a 914, I really do go 28

try a bit higher and work down and see..

brant
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Apr 23 2004, 02:26 PM
Post #8


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



QUOTE(J P Stein @ Apr 23 2004, 02:04 PM)
OK, remember, this is your fault. This pic has seen the rounds, but they are V racers with 26/28 f-r.

I bet if you had more air in them tyres they wouldn't be jumpin' up like that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

Okay. You guys have convinced me. I just dropped them down from 35# to 28# & I'm going out and hittin' some off ramps.

Will report back. Hopefully. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Apr 23 2004, 03:03 PM
Post #9


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



Dang. Started drizzling when I pulled out of the carport. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mad.gif)

Guess it will have to wait til tomorrow.

JP, looking at your outside tires it looks like you must be running the widest rims recommended for your particular tire size. Is this an advantage over running the narrowest rim recommended?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
airsix
post Apr 23 2004, 04:38 PM
Post #10


I have bees in my epiglotis
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,196
Joined: 7-February 03
From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State)
Member No.: 266



QUOTE(joseph222 @ Apr 23 2004, 01:03 PM)
JP, looking at your outside tires it looks like you must be running the widest rims recommended for your particular tire size. Is this an advantage over running the narrowest rim recommended?

I think it just looks that way because he's pulling about .9 G's.

-Ben M.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 23 2004, 05:06 PM
Post #11


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



Those are 7 inch rims. 205s on front, 225s on rear.
Did I mention that them tiars roll under some?.....however, the scrub marks are right at the tips of the arrows.....which is gud....I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Those are the best indicator of proper pressure.....I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Tiar pressure is a black art......I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif).....which is why I'm not too adament bout anything.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
campbellcj
post Apr 24 2004, 12:20 AM
Post #12


I can't Re Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,545
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Agoura, CA
Member No.: 21
Region Association: Southern California



Not kidding, same exact experience here on the Kumhos (Victo and Ecsta). The common wisdom with Hoosiers is 38-40 hot but the Kumhos do not stick at those pressures. I was clued into this by Tyson Schmidt from TRE down here in LA who has been tearing up some incredible times at our local tracks...he found 26-28 (or maybe even less) is where the Kumhos like to be.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Apr 24 2004, 01:11 PM
Post #13


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



Well, I just returned from playing with various air pressures and hitting multiple off ramps (L & R handers), and all I can say is WOW! I think I've found my tire!

You guys are sooo right. I set them at 28# and on my "test" ramps they did not exhibit the slipperiness they did at 35#. In fact, I went back to 35 and then 32# just to be clear about what I was feeling. They would just simply start slipping before you could reach the same threshold obtainable at 28#. I didn't bother with 30 and just went back again to 28#. There is so much grip there I actually started getting concerned about my engine oil pressure!

I now have another question. I plan on running tomorrow's AX at the 28# setting. Kumho says which ever end of the car slips, to add air to make it stop slipping. But with this lower setting, it seems that this would not be true - instead it would seem that adding air could make it worse.

Let's say it's understeering and I'm running 28# F&R. It would seem I need to add 2-3# to the rear tires to create less grip at the rear, which would in turn reduce the understeer (slip up front). Does this sound like a correct assessment for Kumhos at these lower pressures? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 24 2004, 02:32 PM
Post #14


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



I ran 26 in front, but.....this is somethin' your gonna have to fool with. Big handling ills can't be cured by tire pressure alone....just little ones....I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Anyhew, 26/28 front to rear is safe...kinda..., so rather than raise the rear pressure, drop the front.
Go lower than 26 and your on your own.

I'm beginning to think that tiar manufacture's pressure ratings don't take into account a 2000 lb car cause most everything else weighs considerably more. I have seen a few vauge references to dropping psi based on a 3000 lb car.....X amount of drop per X amount of weight.

A tire temp gauge is still your best tool.....I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Apr 24 2004, 03:49 PM
Post #15


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



QUOTE(J P Stein @ Apr 24 2004, 02:32 PM)
I ran 26 in front, but.....this is somethin' your gonna have to fool with. Big handling ills can't be cured by tire pressure alone....just little ones....I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Anyhew, 26/28 front to rear is safe...kinda..., so rather than raise the rear pressure, drop the front.

A tire temp gauge is still your best tool.....I think (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

With the 250# springs, I "think" I'm down to small handling ills (discounting the driver). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)

Your 26F & 28R suggestion makes sense. I know you were looking for more rotation with your car also. At least now I know where to go tomorrow if I want to get the rear a little looser: 26F & 28R.

I will take my temp gauge & St. Christopher (temp gauge may need some help).


Hey Curt, I'd love to go to Hallett but have another AX the same weekend. Another time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Apr 24 2004, 04:56 PM
Post #16


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Thats great info.

QUOTE
JP, looking at your outside tires it looks like you must be running the widest rims recommended for your particular tire size. Is this an advantage over running the narrowest rim recommended?


According to what I know, Running the widest rim is the best. Because If I put 225's on my 7 in rims I get maybe half an inch less of tire than if they where on my dads 9in rims. The wider wheel allows the tire to run its maximum potential. If it where a smaller rim, the tire would roll more and there would not be as much tire on the ground.


I think thats correct.. lol, Im learing.

Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 24 2004, 05:06 PM
Post #17


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



I think your right, Andrew.
I'd run 8s if they'd fit. I need some more (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joseph Mills
post Apr 24 2004, 05:26 PM
Post #18


on a Sonoma diet now...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,482
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Member No.: 39



QUOTE(J P Stein @ Apr 24 2004, 05:06 PM)

I may have to do some "body work" as well. I'm running 225s on 8's in the rear. With these Kumhos I can just barely squeeze my little pinkie between the tire and fender. When I hit a dip, sometimes they chirp.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 24 2004, 08:49 PM
Post #19


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



I have lotso clearance in front......note the cone damage to the rocker.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Apr 24 2004, 08:51 PM
Post #20


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



Ze problem lies here.
Those are the S04 Hoosiers. Note the canteliver effect at the bead.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 05:28 PM