Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Rewiring, Should I go ISIS multiplex or "old school analogue?"
swl
post Dec 19 2010, 08:13 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,409
Joined: 7-August 05
From: Kingston,On,Canada
Member No.: 4,550
Region Association: Canada



This has an enormous cool factor to it. If you were doing a custom car, starting from scratch it would make life easy and fun.

I would have a little hesitation though about trusting essential systems to it. If you lose the ISIS you would be dead in the water. Of course that holds true to a lesser extent even with the stock setup. Lose the fuel pump fuse or relay and you're dead in the water (BTDT)

Don't kid yourself though that it would make the rewire simpler and faster. You have to figure out how it is all going to work, determine your fusing, route all the inputs and outputs, program, test ... And of course you would want to convert to LED and HID and and and ... Buy the right stock harness and it is plug and play.

That said, I think I would do it. The entertainment factor would be worth the $1K You would sure know your electrical systems by the time you are done. And that low voltage switching would make 'check your grounds' a thing of the past.

Go for it! Get the progress thread started!

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Dec 19 2010, 08:20 PM
Post #22


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



What I like about Isis is a lesser amount of connections and lower voltages on the switched leads.. It's a solid state unit that distributes load from main power cells at with a direct power feed.

Plus all the connections are cannon plugs with military grade connectors. It works alot like modern avionics..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BIGKAT_83
post Dec 19 2010, 08:30 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,798
Joined: 25-January 03
From: Way down south Bogart,GA
Member No.: 194
Region Association: South East States



You could make a network yourself with one of the newer micro plc's and even put a HMI in as the centrial unit for $400 or less.
When I first saw the ISIS a couple of years ago I priced out the parts to do something like this at Automation direct.


Bob
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Dec 19 2010, 09:16 PM
Post #24


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,002
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) I was an avionics tech for 4 years and looking at this system I see a good idea that is not quite finished or is too much.

I was thinking it would be easier (less parts, less wires) to have a data bus system, that way you could use one coax wire that would have several signals traveling over it. Then ad solid state "relays" at each destination. One major wire from fore to aft with feeders coming off for various things. You could at least do this for electric gauges so all gauges are on one wire. Seriously clean.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Dec 19 2010, 10:03 PM
Post #25


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Dr Evil @ Dec 19 2010, 08:16 PM) *

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) I was an avionics tech for 4 years and looking at this system I see a good idea that is not quite finished or is too much.

I was thinking it would be easier (less parts, less wires) to have a data bus system, that way you could use one coax wire that would have several signals traveling over it. Then ad solid state "relays" at each destination. One major wire from fore to aft with feeders coming off for various things. You could at least do this for electric gauges so all gauges are on one wire. Seriously clean.


It actually can be configured in that manner, or at least similar to that. Thats the way I'll be wiring my unit.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Dec 19 2010, 10:08 PM
Post #26


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,002
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Hmm, then the value of this system goes up considerably.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JeffBowlsby
post Dec 20 2010, 02:33 PM
Post #27


914 Wiring Harnesses
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,524
Joined: 7-January 03
From: San Ramon CA
Member No.: 104
Region Association: None



Hi Phil,

I checked my inventory, I do have 2 complete 1972 model year chassis harnesses. Let me know if you want one.

Thanks.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 20 2010, 04:16 PM
Post #28


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



It just doesn't seem like the ISIS saves you much, especially when you factor in cost and installation time. Maybe if we had more complicated wiring, or our cars were bigger. The ISIS system doesn't change the number of wires to the components (taillights, headlights, engine, gauges, etc) it simply allows you to swap the long runs of multiple wires to a long run of a few small wires. The full harness is around 14 lbs. I highly doubt the overall weight goes down much in our cars. I think you would see more benefit by building a replica harness, but with smaller wires for things like gauge signals (OE uses 18g) and leaving off the sheathing.

Lots of work and lots of money for very little benefit. What am I missing?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Dec 20 2010, 04:42 PM
Post #29


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,669
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 20 2010, 02:16 PM) *
What am I missing?

Apparently, there is a *cool* factor to this that we (you and me) are missing ...

Maybe if they delivered their harness in stainless steel or chrome wrappings. Instant BLING! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
swl
post Dec 20 2010, 06:31 PM
Post #30


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,409
Joined: 7-August 05
From: Kingston,On,Canada
Member No.: 4,550
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Dec 20 2010, 02:42 PM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 20 2010, 02:16 PM) *
What am I missing?

Apparently, there is a *cool* factor to this that we (you and me) are missing ...

Maybe if they delivered their harness in stainless steel or chrome wrappings. Instant BLING! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

buncha ludites. Why do things simple and cheap if you can do it high tech and expensive? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stirthepot.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 12:05 PM