Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Carb Bellcrank Equation
damnfiknow
post Dec 28 2010, 09:12 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 77
Joined: 25-October 09
From: Texas
Member No.: 10,980
Region Association: None



Someone, please, the equation for determining the diameter of a bellcrank to be used on a Weber 40 setup. Standard 914 accelerator cable length/throw (full close/full open) and standard Weber 40 butterfly. Also, anyone know of a source for such a bellcrank? Hope not to have to farbricate one myself. No lathe so will have to be with an electric drill for turning power. Extremely primitive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 28 2010, 09:17 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



The absolute best bellcrank I've seen is this one from CSP.

It's extremely rugged. Really, really well built. And even uses ball bearings for the rotation. Such a great product and worth every penny.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
biosurfer1
post Dec 28 2010, 10:01 PM
Post #3


Teener fo Life!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,020
Joined: 3-August 03
From: Roseville, CA
Member No.: 977
Region Association: Northern California



I have the one Mark pointed out and I like it. It's easy to adjust and will even work if you install it incorrectly...ask me how I know:/
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Dec 28 2010, 11:15 PM
Post #4


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 28 2010, 07:17 PM) *

The absolute best bellcrank I've seen is this one from CSP.

It's extremely rugged. Really, really well built. And even uses ball bearings for the rotation. Such a great product and worth every penny.


do you have any pics of it installed?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 29 2010, 01:10 PM
Post #5


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



I sure do!


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jeffdon
post Dec 29 2010, 01:15 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,094
Joined: 24-October 06
From: oakland, ca
Member No.: 7,087
Region Association: None



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 29 2010, 11:10 AM) *

I sure do!


So in this setup, it appears that both rods link to the carbs at the BACK of the carbs. My carbs are absolutly identical, which means the rod attachments are at the front of one carb, the back of the other. My bell crank is homebrew and designed to accommodate this. I have a hunch that it does not pull equally on both carbs. anyone care to comment on the viability of my set up? Don't hate on the general condition of the rest of the engine bay, I have cleaned it up since i took the pic.


Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Dec 29 2010, 01:32 PM
Post #7


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 29 2010, 11:10 AM) *

I sure do!


do you think this is a better setup than the hex linkage from cb performance?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Dec 29 2010, 02:16 PM
Post #8


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,347
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



QUOTE(mrbubblehead @ Dec 29 2010, 11:32 AM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 29 2010, 11:10 AM) *

I sure do!


do you think this is a better setup than the hex linkage from cb performance?

I had a type 1, full race 1776 that I used to drag race. I had the hex linkage come off many times due to wheel hop. Always at the pivot points. I've never tried this bell crank but I have made my own in the past. I would lean to the bell crank over the hex.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Dec 29 2010, 02:23 PM
Post #9


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(jeffdon @ Dec 29 2010, 11:15 AM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 29 2010, 11:10 AM) *

I sure do!


So in this setup, it appears that both rods link to the carbs at the BACK of the carbs. My carbs are absolutly identical, which means the rod attachments are at the front of one carb, the back of the other. My bell crank is homebrew and designed to accommodate this. I have a hunch that it does not pull equally on both carbs. anyone care to comment on the viability of my set up? Don't hate on the general condition of the rest of the engine bay, I have cleaned it up since i took the pic.


Attached Image


seams like i had a single 4o idf setup on a center mount type 1 offroad car. the carb i had had the throttle pull on the wrong side. FAT performance had the arm to allow me to put it on the other side of the carb so i could use it. but if your linkage is working well, it might not be worth the change.

reread your post. its not working well. call FAT. if i remember right, the arm is different, so you cant move it front to back. but check to make sure. maybe it was the arm on MY carb that wouldnt work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Dec 29 2010, 02:24 PM
Post #10


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,205
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(jeffdon @ Dec 29 2010, 11:15 AM) *
My carbs are absolutly identical, which means the rod attachments are at the front of one carb, the back of the other.

Just switch the attachment on one of your carbs so they both attach in the rear ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Dec 29 2010, 02:34 PM
Post #11


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,025
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 28 2010, 07:17 PM) *

The absolute best bellcrank I've seen is this one from CSP.

It's extremely rugged. Really, really well built. And even uses ball bearings for the rotation. Such a great product and worth every penny.


Is this what I should be using for my Jenvey's Mr. McMark?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Dec 29 2010, 02:39 PM
Post #12


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(jeffdon @ Dec 29 2010, 11:15 AM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 29 2010, 11:10 AM) *

I sure do!


So in this setup, it appears that both rods link to the carbs at the BACK of the carbs. My carbs are absolutly identical, which means the rod attachments are at the front of one carb, the back of the other. My bell crank is homebrew and designed to accommodate this. I have a hunch that it does not pull equally on both carbs. anyone care to comment on the viability of my set up? Don't hate on the general condition of the rest of the engine bay, I have cleaned it up since i took the pic.


Attached Image


it looks like the parts in the csp link comes with the arms for the carbs so you may not need anything extra (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anderssj
post Dec 29 2010, 02:43 PM
Post #13


Dog is my copilot...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,736
Joined: 28-January 03
From: VA
Member No.: 207
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 28 2010, 11:17 PM) *

The absolute best bellcrank I've seen is this one from CSP.

It's extremely rugged. Really, really well built. And even uses ball bearings for the rotation. Such a great product and worth every penny.


Looks VERY nice!

CSP's web-site says the linkage fits Weber IDFs, but no word on Dellorto DRLAs. I'm thinking that if CB Performance hex linkage fits both, then the CSP should too. Anyone using this on Dell's?

Thanks!

Steve A-
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cevan
post Dec 29 2010, 03:03 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,079
Joined: 11-December 06
From: Western Massachusetts
Member No.: 7,351



Let me see if I can remember how I did mine. If I recall, the sweep of the IDF's butterfly is 78 degrees. I measured mine. Then I measured the amount of cable taken up by the gas pedal (with the adjuster at about the mid-way point). The circumference of a pulley needed to pull the right amount of cable is the length of the cable throw divided by (78/360). The radius of the bellcrank or in my case, the pulley is the circumference divided by 2*pi.

So if the gas pedal took up 2 inches of cable, then the circumference is 2/(78/360)=9.2 inches. The radius of the pulley=9.2/2*pi=1.47 inches. So the diameter would be 2.94 inches.

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 29 2010, 03:49 PM
Post #15


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(jeffdon @ Dec 29 2010, 11:15 AM) *

I have a hunch that it does not pull equally on both carbs. anyone care to comment on the viability of my set up?

Unequal pulling/pushing is unacceptable. You should be able to adjust your carbs so that they hit WOT at the same time and flow the same volume of air at idle. I'm a fan of home built stuff, but you gotta be 100% accurate with this type of thing or you're engine may not run smoothly or you may be tossing money away in wasted fuel. A carb linkage should have ZERO slop or wobble. It should move both carbs equally, and it should be simple.

QUOTE(mrbubblehead @ Dec 29 2010, 11:32 AM) *

do you think this is a better setup than the hex linkage from cb performance?

100% better. I will NEVER recommend hex linkages again. They are all horrible.

QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Dec 29 2010, 12:34 PM) *

Is this what I should be using for my Jenvey's Mr. McMark?

I think so. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sunglasses.gif)

QUOTE(anderssj @ Dec 29 2010, 12:43 PM) *

CSP's web-site says the linkage fits Weber IDFs, but no word on Dellorto DRLAs. I'm thinking that if CB Performance hex linkage fits both, then the CSP should too. Anyone using this on Dell's?

It looks like they'll work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
azbill
post Dec 29 2010, 05:57 PM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 455
Joined: 26-July 04
From: Glendale, Az
Member No.: 2,403
Region Association: Southwest Region



Take a look at the Sidewinder bell crank designed for the Type IV engine. I use this on my Jenvey throttle bodies works perfect. every time all the time Yes I make them and sell them. Check the vendors section.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Sep 12 2019, 05:21 PM
Post #17


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,246
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



@mcmark In the example pic you provided it appears the angle of the T-cable comes from the front of the engine rather than the R side like OE?
Did you find its necessary to reroute due to cable length or bracket placement?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
johnhora
post Sep 12 2019, 09:53 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 885
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Derby City KY
Member No.: 107
Region Association: None



Source for the CSP Mark mentioned...

https://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?Pr...129%2D941%2D400

out of stock at the moment but they get more all the time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porschetub
post Sep 13 2019, 01:22 AM
Post #19


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,816
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



QUOTE(mrbubblehead @ Dec 30 2010, 07:32 AM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 29 2010, 11:10 AM) *

I sure do!


do you think this is a better setup than the hex linkage from cb performance?


Yes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porschetub
post Sep 13 2019, 01:29 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,816
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



QUOTE(johnhora @ Sep 13 2019, 03:53 PM) *

Source for the CSP Mark mentioned...

https://www2.cip1.com/ProductDetails.asp?Pr...129%2D941%2D400

out of stock at the moment but they get more all the time.

I heard they are no longer being made in the 914 application (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) .
Been searching for a customer for sometime,plenty in the UK but the shipping is mental for me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 01:04 AM