Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Another idea for the rear suspension
bam914
post Jul 5 2011, 07:56 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 23-November 03
From: Atlanta, Ga
Member No.: 1,378
Region Association: None



I have finally finished all of my side work and can get back on the transformation of the ITB 914 to EP. I started the rear suspension over a year ago and I am finally finishing it up. It is a little different then what others have done.

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jul 5 2011, 08:42 PM
Post #2


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



Interesting.

Do you think the heim joint can swing far enough to not limit the travel?
I assume you have tested this and I have no idea, just makes me wonder why you put it horizontal instead of vertical?

But, I would never attempt what you are doing.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bam914
post Jul 5 2011, 09:31 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 23-November 03
From: Atlanta, Ga
Member No.: 1,378
Region Association: None



It has 10" of travel measured at the hub, which is way more movement then I need. I mounted them that way to make it easier to just the roll center. I can move the heims up or down together or move one up and the other down. The box on the end allows me to adjust camber and toe without effecting the rollcenter. Here are the reducers I used for the rod ends.
http://www.ballisticfabrication.com/303-SS...-58_p_1240.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
partwerks
post Jul 5 2011, 09:37 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,593
Joined: 7-September 06
From: Grand Island, NE
Member No.: 6,787



What's suppose to be the difference with this set up?

Wouldn't those tubes be in the road of the engine?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bam914
post Jul 6 2011, 05:52 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 23-November 03
From: Atlanta, Ga
Member No.: 1,378
Region Association: None



QUOTE(partwerks @ Jul 5 2011, 07:37 PM) *

What's suppose to be the difference with this set up?

Wouldn't those tubes be in the road of the engine?


Full adjustment of the rear roll center and camber adjustment without effecting it. Some have cut the trailing arm in half and twisted the arm to help lower the roll center. In my setup you don't have to do that.

I mocked it up with the engine in the car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jul 6 2011, 06:02 AM
Post #6


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(bam914 @ Jul 5 2011, 11:31 PM) *

It has 10" of travel measured at the hub, which is way more movement then I need. I mounted them that way to make it easier to just the roll center. I can move the heims up or down together or move one up and the other down. The box on the end allows me to adjust camber and toe without effecting the rollcenter. Here are the reducers I used for the rod ends.
http://www.ballisticfabrication.com/303-SS...-58_p_1240.html

makes sense and now that you explain it...cool.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FourBlades
post Jul 6 2011, 10:59 AM
Post #7


From Wreck to Rockin
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,054
Joined: 3-December 07
From: Brevard, FL
Member No.: 8,414
Region Association: South East States




That is very cool Blake.

You should be able to get really good rear suspension setup even with it radically lowered. That should keep the toe in from changing under breaking and acceleration as well.

John
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
0396
post Jul 7 2011, 07:49 AM
Post #8


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,046
Joined: 13-October 03
From: L.A. Calif
Member No.: 1,245
Region Association: Southern California



Very cool (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jul 7 2011, 08:37 AM
Post #9


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



did you end up raising the pivot point when you made this setup?

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bam914
post Jul 7 2011, 08:50 AM
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 23-November 03
From: Atlanta, Ga
Member No.: 1,378
Region Association: None



Yes I did raise it up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 11:25 AM