Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What type of bracing for large motor 914's?, If I go big...what do I need to brace?
nine14cats
post Jul 18 2004, 11:10 AM
Post #1


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



I'm currently scheming on my motor rebuild for my 914. I don't have a lack of ideas to spend my money. I know of 8 engines including mine in various states that I can get a hold of to stuff in.

If I go to a bigger motor (3.4 or 3.6) what do I need to reinforce in my 914's chassis to handle the added torque? I've got the trans covered...If I go big I'll go big on the gearbox also (can you say WEVO, close ratio!).....

$$$$$$$$ (IMG:style_emoticons/default/barf.gif)

Of course I can stay with my 2.7 / 901 combo for another fun season...and that may happen to get the car up again before the end of this year...but I may just buy one of these bad boy large motor longblocks and have fun during the winter.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

Any suggestions on bracing? Pics?

Thanks,

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john rogers
post Jul 18 2004, 11:49 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Chula Vista CA
Member No.: 391



If you have large wheel/tires too, I would say to brace the suspension console so the added power does not rip it apart. If the trailing arms are not boxed I would do them also. Finally, the "GT" type sheetmetal reenforcement kit would be beneficial. Good luck.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ArtechnikA
post Jul 18 2004, 12:01 PM
Post #3


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



trailing arms and GT bracing are controversial, at least. i would -not- box the trailing arms. there is little evidence the GT 'reinforcement' panels do anything good unless you are trying to reproduce a factory GT clone where it's a cosmetic necessity...

once upon a time i was all set to do both, but we have learned a lot in the intervening 30 years.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jul 18 2004, 01:10 PM
Post #4


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



Since the motor is out.........

The inner suspension mounts would be a good place to start. For all the "stuff" on the market for "strengthing" the frame/suspension, this is the weak link and nothing is offered to get after it. The more grip you've got, the more danger of failure.

One of these days,I'm gonna have to come up with something.....hopefully, it will be at my leisure and not by necessity.

You've already got the spring towers tied into the cage, right?.....and the trans mount channel braced into that?

A well built, hotrod 3.4L would be nice..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/burnout.gif)
less hassle than a 3.6L......since we're spending your money. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Jul 18 2004, 01:49 PM
Post #5


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



Other than a full cage I have not tied anything together yet. That's why with the car in pieces I can have the welding done now.

Yep...a nice 3.4L...couple of ways to go. Destroke a modern 3.6 or take a base 3.0/3.2 and go big....all of it sounds like fun. Money will be an issue...but it normally is for anything on this car (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

I guess I'll give Tony C a call and pick his brain...I can drop off the car and have it back in plenty of time to stuff the engine back in.

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Jul 18 2004, 06:25 PM
Post #6


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



Bill, I know you passed on the Griggs motor, trans and tub combo.

I think you should go look at it for yourself.
I saw it and it is stored indoors up off the ground. I think he told you it has " moss " on it. He told me " fuzz ".
The reality is it has mild oxidation/scale on the timing chain covers.

I'd arrange to run and dyno that race motor and make an offer. That's me with your money or me if I had my own money. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol2.gif)

He said the trans is a 915 built box, if he didn't tell you.

His shop is next door to Racer's Group at the track.

Trekkor
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Jul 18 2004, 06:37 PM
Post #7


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



Hi Trekkor,

Thanks for the info. When I talked to Griggs, he said he wouldn't part the motor separate from the rest of the stuff. I don't want the tub, so the draw wasn't that strong. I talked to him at length on the phone and he said the tranny was a built 901, not a 915. Besides....I'm going bigger. I'll either run my 2.7 again while building a bigger motor or I will just go straight to a bigger motor. Haven't decided...but I'm trying to convince myself to stay down for as long as it takes to finish what I want, including skipping next yer if I have to.

Tough choices...but like everyone else I am fiscally challenged.

Thanks,

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john rogers
post Jul 18 2004, 10:49 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Chula Vista CA
Member No.: 391



Here's a small pict of the rear suspension console brace we use. Made of cro-moly tube with adjustable ends. It has been used since the early 80's and kept the console from ripping despite offs, spins, etc with slicks.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jul 18 2004, 11:03 PM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Bill,

Do you have a full cage??? If so, what ID/OD is it and how close are you to the wieght limit if it is the "smaller" tubing?

I big motor w/915 might push the weight up too high for some cages to be legal.....just food for thought (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Jul 21 2004, 11:50 AM
Post #10


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



bump...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jul 21 2004, 02:41 PM
Post #11


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,927
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



This is what I do Bill.

(IMG:http://www.tangerineracing.com/images/Suspension&Brakes/rearsusp_reinf.JPG)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jul 21 2004, 02:48 PM
Post #12


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



I like that. Gonna stare at them pics summore (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nine14cats
post Jul 21 2004, 03:01 PM
Post #13


Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,618
Joined: 10-February 03
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 287
Region Association: None



Hi Chris,

Would that be good enough for the torque of a 3.6 motor? The engine is out right now...so I could get all this stuff done before stuffing in the new motor...

I'm with JP, I gonna stare at those pics for awhile!

Bill P.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jul 21 2004, 03:08 PM
Post #14


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Chris, do you ever see the need to reinforce the transmission mounting sheetmetal?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jul 21 2004, 03:52 PM
Post #15


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,927
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(nine14cats @ Jul 21 2004, 05:01 PM)
Would that be good enough for the torque of a 3.6 motor?

I think it will take at least 300hp with 12" wide tires.

QUOTE
do you ever see the need to reinforce the transmission mounting sheetmetal?


I've never done it yet, unless the trunk floor was cut out. Based on the extent of damage to my car from hitting the Armco I'd say that area is pretty stiff and doesn't really need reinforcing. Maybe a small tube from the shock towers on each side, but no need to cross them like I've seen on other cars.
Actually it is probably better to do any reinforcements there, on the underside, from the rear of the longitudinal to the trans. bracket.

Without the trunk sheetmetal I would do something like this.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeroen
post Jul 21 2004, 04:21 PM
Post #16


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,887
Joined: 24-December 02
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 3
Region Association: Europe



I like this one
(IMG:http://www.tangerineracing.com/images/Suspension&Brakes/rearsusp_reinf.JPG)
But call me paranoia, I'd hate it if (30+ year old) threads in the nuts on the top of the outer susp. console would shred or if the bolts broke. You'd have to cut it all out to access it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

This may be over the top, but I can't help liking it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
(IMG:http://www.vehiclecraft.com/pictures/Cust_cars/Dolbow/images/0014_JPG.jpg)
I'm gonna try and get as close to this as I can...
More cool stuff here www.vehiclecraft.com/custcars.html

Check out Tony C's site as well for some good ideas
www.tcdesignfab.com

cheers,

Jeroen
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Jul 21 2004, 04:39 PM
Post #17


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



The GGR rule book discusses some 914 bracing. Some looks very similar to what Racer Chris shows.

Scroll down to the bottom:

http://www.pca-ggr.org/ggrrb5.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Jul 21 2004, 05:03 PM
Post #18


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750



Bill,

Check with Mike A. up in Sacramento. He has installed a 996 in his 914; in fact it at Tony's shop right now, less engine.

Randal
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jul 21 2004, 06:03 PM
Post #19


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,927
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jeroen @ Jul 21 2004, 06:21 PM)
call me paranoia, I'd hate it if (30+ year old) threads in the nuts on the top of the outer susp. console would shred or if the bolts broke. You'd have to cut it all out to access it  :blink:

Piece of cake!
Actually, that already happened to a customer of mine who had this mod already done by me.
He broke a bolt, and there was no way to get it back out, after he broke 2 easy-outs inside there.
I was able to replace just the sleeve that the bolt threads into, without removing the reinforcement. I did have to cut an access window through the back. If it was the front one it would have been a bit harder.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/sawzall-smiley.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mueba.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeroen
post Jul 21 2004, 06:12 PM
Post #20


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,887
Joined: 24-December 02
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 3
Region Association: Europe



Yeah, but what you can fab/fix in an hour would take me prolly a week (and the days in that week would be scattered over a 2 month period)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

cheers,

Jeroen
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 05:42 PM