Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sodium filled exhaust valve, Do I have one
ruddyboys
post Jul 22 2004, 12:10 PM
Post #1


Hummel eigentümer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 594
Joined: 3-March 04
From: Monroe, NY
Member No.: 1,749
Region Association: North East States



Does anyone have a pic of what the sodium filled exhaust valve look like. I have to pull the engine to replace a valve spring, again, so I figured I would replave a exhaust valve the has a little damage to the top.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jul 22 2004, 12:35 PM
Post #2


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Sodium filled valves have a very small dimple right in their center, its maybe 3-4mm diameter.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave Bell
post Jul 22 2004, 12:47 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 234
Joined: 27-November 03
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Member No.: 1,398
Region Association: None



I don't have any pictures, but there is a nice summary of the multiple advantages of the Sodium filled valves at.

http://www.ganioglu.com/supar/sodyum/sodium_filled.htm

Reminds me of a MIG/TIG welding class I took about a year ago.. someone had donate a couple boxes full of partially finished and blank titanium valves and other students had welded some together as practice material... what a shame! There were still lots left though... an man were those babies light.

- Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ruddyboys
post Jul 22 2004, 12:53 PM
Post #4


Hummel eigentümer
***

Group: Members
Posts: 594
Joined: 3-March 04
From: Monroe, NY
Member No.: 1,749
Region Association: North East States



Mine don't look like these from PP.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jul 22 2004, 01:56 PM
Post #5


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



No benefits of Sodium valves in the Type 4! Not that i have seen...

Nice explosions though :-)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Jul 22 2004, 02:18 PM
Post #6


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



QUOTE(ruddyboys @ Jul 22 2004, 10:10 AM)
I have to pull the engine to replace a valve spring, again,

I would think that you should be able to replace a valve spring with the engine in the car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Jul 22 2004, 02:22 PM
Post #7


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



Any reason why you can't go with stainless in a stock motor? Reliability issues?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jul 22 2004, 02:34 PM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Stainless is BETTER than sodium!! I build 20,000 buck engines with stainless valves! (they are severe duty valves, however)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jul 22 2004, 02:37 PM
Post #9


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,990
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The valves in the photo do not appear to be sodium-filled.

Jake has never seen a benefit to the sodium-filled ones, but he does not build stock engines. Porsche decided that they were a good idea to help keep the exhaust valves from burning. They help transfer heat from the valve face through the valve stem to the valve guide, and from there to the cylinder head where it can (hopefully!) be radiated away to the cooling air.

I myself would strongly consider the sodium-filled valves on a stock motor. If, however, I were paying a pro (e.g., Jake) to build a motor for me, I would listen for his advice and pay attention to his recommendations for that specific motor.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Jul 22 2004, 02:56 PM
Post #10


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



I have spoken to several different shops about going with one or the other and it seems to be about 50/50 either way. Based on the experience of builders like Jake and others, dosn't it make sense that if stainless works well under the rigors of racing that they would do well for street use? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bperry
post Jul 22 2004, 03:59 PM
Post #11


Lurker
**

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 16-February 04
From: Dallas, Tx
Member No.: 1,661



I have no idea where I originally heard this but,
I always thought that the purpose of the sodium was to enhance
valve cooling by using the phase changes of the sodium changing back
and forth between solid and liquid states.
I thought the theory was that it went liquid during the combustion
cycle then at some point before the next combustion cycle it
turned back to solid.
Since it consumes quite a bit of energy to change states that you
got a slight cooling effect for free as the sodium transitioned back
to solid state.
It always sounded like a good theory.
Maybe it only works at low engine speeds like at idle?
and is only needed when running hotter running cams like the stock
FI cam?
That would explain why racers would never see any difference.

Anyone else ever heard of this?

--- bill
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 12:41 AM