Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How much do your door gaps change when you jack up the car?
siverson
post Oct 15 2011, 09:29 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



I'm trying to figure out what's "right"... How much do your door gaps change when you jack up the car in the middle? Assuming an otherwise normal, non-rusty car.

Mine get *a little* tighter on the bottom and widen at the top - is that normal?

- None?
- Not measureable?
- 1mm?
- 2mm?
- More? A lot?

-Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
matthepcat
post Oct 15 2011, 09:48 AM
Post #2


Meat Popsicle
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,462
Joined: 13-December 09
From: Saratoga CA
Member No.: 11,125
Region Association: Northern California



Mine is not measurable but I have a chassis kit, welded cockpit seams and firewall to rear strut tower bracing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Oct 15 2011, 10:25 AM
Post #3


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Same, none, but I have the long stiffening kit and a solid car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tradisrad
post Oct 15 2011, 11:05 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 985
Joined: 11-September 06
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 6,815
Region Association: Northern California



no visible change, no chassis mods.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Drums66
post Oct 15 2011, 11:11 AM
Post #5


914 Rudiments
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,321
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Coronado,Cali
Member No.: 151
Region Association: Southwest Region



.....I like to admit this, solid car with no negative change!
someone else get's the benefit (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
siverson
post Oct 15 2011, 11:48 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



I wonder if the 3.6 and 915 (both heavy) are part of my problem...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sfrenck
post Oct 15 2011, 11:51 AM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 492
Joined: 28-February 10
From: Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 11,411
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Too much... two Brad Mayeur stiffeners in my near future.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Drums66
post Oct 15 2011, 11:58 AM
Post #8


914 Rudiments
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,321
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Coronado,Cali
Member No.: 151
Region Association: Southwest Region



.....When going against initial engineering...I would think there would have to
be compensation in certain areas?? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sean_v8_914
post Oct 15 2011, 12:42 PM
Post #9


Chingon 601
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,011
Joined: 1-February 05
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,541



I think you must define the jacking point
are you talking about at the rear doughnut? your car is normal.
those of you that say no change are:
a. full of it
b. in denial
c. unobservant
d. all of the above
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post Oct 15 2011, 12:42 PM
Post #10


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,318
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(siverson @ Oct 15 2011, 10:48 AM) *

I wonder if the 3.6 and 915 (both heavy) are part of my problem...


The 915 isn't much heavier than a 901, and the 914 was designed to take up to the 2.7 -6 at least - had they not stopped production of the 914-6 in 72, since it was slated to get the next-last generation 911 motor as the 911 upgraded over time.

So the slightly heavier 3.6 shouldn't change the flex at the longs significantly I wouldn't think, unless there's something else going on.

Normal good longs/unibody should give about nil. You need to check for corrision issues IMHO.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
computers4kids
post Oct 15 2011, 01:01 PM
Post #11


Love these little cars!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,443
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Port Townsend, WA
Member No.: 4,253
Region Association: None



no change, v8
No extra stiffening
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Oct 15 2011, 01:14 PM
Post #12


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



"those of you that say no change are:"
....
or E - have a rollcage.

not only did I see no change, but the car balances on three jackstands.
The fourth jackstand is loose.

That is how stiff these cars should be.

Stu
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
siverson
post Oct 15 2011, 05:16 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



Thanks. Interesting conflicting opinions here...

> are you talking about at the rear doughnut?

Yes.

-Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Oct 15 2011, 09:28 PM
Post #14


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,443
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



If there is enough deflection that you can notice it, there is a problem.

Maybe not if you have a v8 for an engine, or a big 6. But for a subi or a T4 there should not be much if any deflection.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Oct 15 2011, 10:30 PM
Post #15


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



This is normal right??? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/barf.gif)

Attached Image

Attached Image


This car is cut up to be reborn as a 914 trailer... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John
post Oct 16 2011, 01:09 AM
Post #16


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



Mine does not move any longer. I made my own LONG stiffeners before I ever heard of anyone else offering these for sale. Must have been 20+ years ago....

The track car does not move, but it is stiffened and a roll cage.

The future track car does not move, but it is a stripped tub.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Oct 16 2011, 09:42 AM
Post #17


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(sean_v8_914 @ Oct 15 2011, 11:42 AM) *

I think you must define the jacking point
are you talking about at the rear doughnut? your car is normal.
those of you that say no change are:
a. full of it
b. in denial
c. unobservant
d. all of the above


Read stiffening kits?

I remember seeing some unmeasurable amount of flex when I jacked the car up years ago. But with my v8 in the back and the stiffening kit, the chassis is rock solid.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sean_v8_914
post Oct 16 2011, 10:47 AM
Post #18


Chingon 601
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,011
Joined: 1-February 05
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,541



throwing modified cars into the study group dilutes the real answer i think. the question was about a STOCK chassis, right?

every bone stock 914 will flex when lifted at the rear doughnut. this is not an opinion. this is an observation from a guy that deals with these cars almost every day. some flex more, some less. some flex due to rust. some due to chassis fatigue. some have spot welds that give up along the seams. some were driven by grandma while some wore slicks for 10 years.....
all this affects how loose the chassis has become

if you think that your stock 914 chassis does not flex then you are an optimistic person and I like upbeat positive people
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
somd914
post Oct 16 2011, 11:48 AM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,171
Joined: 21-February 11
From: Southern Maryland
Member No.: 12,741
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Can't say that I have ever measured it, don't think an eyeball and a casual glance would notice a 1-2 mm change. Do know there is no change that jumps out at me and both doors open/close the same when on a single stand, multiple stands, or on the ground. But does this mean the chasis isn't flexing? I wouldn't draw that conclusion. And yes, I typically use the donuts, oh, stock 2.0 setup.

QUOTE(siverson @ Oct 15 2011, 11:29 AM) *

I'm trying to figure out what's "right"... How much do your door gaps change when you jack up the car in the middle? Assuming an otherwise normal, non-rusty car.

Mine get *a little* tighter on the bottom and widen at the top - is that normal?

- None?
- Not measureable?
- 1mm?
- 2mm?
- More? A lot?

-Steve

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stewteral
post Oct 16 2011, 11:55 AM
Post #20


Old Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-December 07
From: Camarillo, CA
Member No.: 8,424
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(sean_v8_914 @ Oct 15 2011, 11:42 AM) *

I think you must define the jacking point
are you talking about at the rear doughnut? your car is normal.
those of you that say no change are:
a. full of it
b. in denial
c. unobservant
d. all of the above


sean_v8_914,

LOL!! You sure hit the nail on the head.

For my car there is 0 change thanks to my full rollcage that ties in all the suspension towers.

I now know why my 1st 914 (30 years ago) always had a squeaky roof: the chassis was flexing over bumps in the road!

Best,
Terry
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 10:34 AM