Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914club.com BBS is slow, anyone else notice this?
siverson
post Aug 17 2004, 12:46 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,458
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



I know this came up a few weeks ago, but was it ever resolved? The page load times seem to be getting slower and slower.

I can't imagine that you need a super high horsepower server or connection to run this site... Just playing armchair system admininstrator from the sidelines it seems some database tuning may be needed. I'd be happy to contribute to a fund for a faster server or some DB consultants time or... ?

-Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
5 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(20 - 39)
ematulac
post Aug 17 2004, 06:07 PM
Post #21


914 addict
***

Group: Members
Posts: 540
Joined: 24-November 03
From: Palmdale, CA
Member No.: 1,382



It's moving even slower for me now than it was before. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Aug 17 2004, 06:27 PM
Post #22


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,098
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



OK. I moved the monster threads, backed up the db and rebooted the box. Let's see how it works out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 17 2004, 06:34 PM
Post #23


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,257
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Brad Roberts @ Aug 17 2004, 03:43 PM)
I knew Andy was in trouble when he said that...

ok, the "metal tubes" around the FO-Pipe is about the size of my arm ...

geeze, you guys. so, do you think the OC48 is big enough?
IIRC it's about 1600 x faster than a T1 ....

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) Andy
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
siverson
post Aug 27 2004, 04:50 PM
Post #24


Advanced Member
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,458
Joined: 5-May 03
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 654
Region Association: Southern California



Really slow today again... What else can be tried to speed things up?

-Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty
post Aug 27 2004, 04:55 PM
Post #25


The Fun Never Stops
***

Group: Members
Posts: 773
Joined: 20-May 03
From: Portland. Oregon (SW)
Member No.: 718
Region Association: None



As









long











as










it










loads













at














all,















I'm















okay











with





it!


Look!

it's
going
faster now! It really seems okay if you have something to sip while you wait (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vortrex
post Aug 27 2004, 05:11 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,687
Joined: 24-December 02
From: SF, CA
Member No.: 4
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Aug 17 2004, 04:34 PM)
geeze, you guys. so, do you think the OC48 is big enough?
IIRC it's about 1600 x faster than a T1 ....

that's fine and all, OC48, but you do not have OC48 plugged into the NIC card of the server so it's kinda irrelevant.

yeah real slow for me since last night. sometimes it stalls and takes 20 sec+ to load the page.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 27 2004, 07:26 PM
Post #27


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,180
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Watching the 'top' statistics shows that the CPU is regularly maxxed out. As well, the physical memory seems to be maxxed out and 125 mb of swap space is being used. Sounds like the box is being tapped out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Aug 27 2004, 07:33 PM
Post #28


2270 club
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,107
Joined: 1-February 03
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Member No.: 218



125MBs of swap isn't a lot. How much memory in the box?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Aug 27 2004, 07:36 PM
Post #29


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,180
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Looks like 256 mb. The load average was up to 5 a few minutes ago with 150 mb of swap being used.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Aug 27 2004, 08:34 PM
Post #30


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



On Linux, using ANY swap kills performance. This goes double if it's a 2.2 or early 2.4 kernel. Linux is very aggressive about keeping stuff in RAM, and it performs very badly (relative to, say, Solaris) when forced to swap. More than any other flavor of Un*x, adding memory to a Linux box is a big win.

Is this thing all in PHP? You running Zend?

If any of the admins (Andy) are going to be at the breakfast tomorrow, I'd be happy to chat about the setup. I've run some very high traffic sites on a shoestring before (> 1M/day on < $1000). PHP and MySQL. Or just email me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Qarl
post Aug 27 2004, 08:43 PM
Post #31


Shriveled member
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,233
Joined: 8-February 03
From: Florida
Member No.: 271
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/clap56.gif)

Anything would help.

THe thing that bothers me is that the slow down happened rather suddenly several months ago. It was all fine and dandy... and then something happened.

It wasn't like it was a gradual decline in performance.

I think something was tweaked wrong or some code is unnecessarily running some loops it should be doing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Aug 27 2004, 10:05 PM
Post #32


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE
THe thing that bothers me is that the slow down happened rather suddenly several months ago. It was all fine and dandy... and then something happened.

It wasn't like it was a gradual decline in performance.


That's consistent with swap being the problem. There's probably been a gradual increase in load as the forum got more popular, which probably causes more threads in Apache and MySQL to linger, which takes up more RAM, until it runs out. Then, suddenly, performance will nosedive as it has to swap. I've seen that time and again on growing websites running Linux.

Memory is so cheap now that unless the box you're using is really old, you should be able to bump it up to 1GB pretty cheaply. I'd be willing to contribute $ (and labor, if necessary), just like in the hard drive buy. Should be cheaper than that was. Even going to 512MB would help a great deal.

Once you have adequate memory, another thing that may help is using Squid or the like to do static content serving. Apache is actually pretty heavy-weight for static content, and putting Squid in httpd-accelerator mode ahead of it, and setting it to only cache certain kinds of responses (basically nothing with .php in the URL, here) can also speed things up dramatically, as Squid is very efficient at stupid things like static content (images, esp).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Aug 27 2004, 11:24 PM
Post #33


2270 club
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,107
Joined: 1-February 03
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Member No.: 218



My suggestion is that we buy something like this or better:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...5717352418&rd=1

Since the ecommerce site is close at hand we could do a limited edition club tshirt for say $30/each instead of the usual $20/each. I'm sure the pent up demand for t-shirts is huge.

500 tshirts x $10 = $5000
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eric_Shea
post Aug 28 2004, 08:11 AM
Post #34


PMB Performance
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 19,304
Joined: 3-September 03
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Member No.: 1,110
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE
That fiber is actually less than a mm thick.


He mis-quoted... he didn't mean his "arm"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 28 2004, 12:27 PM
Post #35


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 42,257
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Eric_Shea @ Aug 28 2004, 07:11 AM)
He mis-quoted... he didn't mean his "arm"

:finger2:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tommy914
post Aug 28 2004, 01:18 PM
Post #36


Life is a journey, enjoy every turn.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,103
Joined: 15-September 03
From: Ridgeland, MS
Member No.: 1,165
Region Association: None



Andy,
is there a way to turn off Avatars at the server?

Based on your Avatar post, there seem to be quite a few large pics being used as avatars.

So either the server is spending time shrinking them before sending, or is sending the whole pic and letting the browser shrink. Either way, its takes time.
(or I have no idea what I am talking about )

I have my personal settings to not show avatars, and the pages generally load within 2 to 5 seconds.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Aug 28 2004, 05:29 PM
Post #37


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



I'll secure more ram for the box this week. The question will be WHEN we can install it.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Qarl
post Aug 29 2004, 11:44 AM
Post #38


Shriveled member
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,233
Joined: 8-February 03
From: Florida
Member No.: 271
Region Association: None



Seems a every so slightly better right now...

Did you add more memory?

Maybe no one's logged on...

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
seanery
post Aug 29 2004, 11:45 AM
Post #39


waiting to rebuild whitey!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 15,857
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Indy
Member No.: 100
Region Association: None



it's normal speed at "OFF" hours. I think we're tapping out the resources of the box when we have 100 people checking it out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Aug 29 2004, 11:54 AM
Post #40


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



I'm trying to talk the guy who built the box for me 5 years ago to "spot" us some ram. He is a Corvette car guy... I asked him to set aside 2 512 sticks for us "if" the motherboard will take it. Worst case scenerio it gets 4 256 sticks.


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

5 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th July 2025 - 09:03 PM