 Ca. Smog Law Changes, Another amendment |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Allan |
 Aug 24 2004, 09:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Teenerless Weenie  Group: Members Posts: 8,373 Joined: 5-July 04 From: Western Mesopotamia Member No.: 2,304 Region Association: Southern California  |
Any politicos here that can interpret this stuff? What happens now that it's been amended or if it dosn't get finalized before the Senate adjourns next month?
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquer...arch_type=email |
   |
 
|
Posts in this topic
Headrage Ca. Smog Law Changes Aug 24 2004, 09:42 AM
lapuwali Very, very interesting.
My read on this is that t... Aug 24 2004, 10:19 AM dmenche914 WARNING, DANGER!
This Bill is still BULL, t... Aug 24 2004, 01:18 PM Marty Yeoman Am I wrong or does it say:
Sec 2 Section 44011 of... Aug 24 2004, 01:46 PM ! Has to go thru BOTH houses again....my opinion the... Aug 24 2004, 02:16 PM Headrage (6) Prior to Ja... Aug 24 2004, 03:05 PM dmenche914 Right now, current law is 30 year rolling exemptio... Aug 24 2004, 03:29 PM lapuwali I have to disagree that the admendment is worthles... Aug 24 2004, 05:06 PM dmenche914 then again, if my car was 35 plus years old, and r... Aug 24 2004, 07:03 PM Brad Roberts You'll love this:
BUY BOXSTERS... :D
B Aug 24 2004, 07:08 PM dmenche914 Geer Ugh, oh well, Had to come to that, but I rat... Aug 24 2004, 07:29 PM Cap'n Krusty "Maybe all 914's are exempt. I don't think... Aug 24 2004, 08:10 PM elwood-914 In Amador County, we don't have manditory smog... Aug 24 2004, 10:23 PM Headrage Additional action has occurred.
http://www.leginf... Aug 25 2004, 10:15 AM dmenche914 Ok, back to the Assembly, where it already has pas... Aug 25 2004, 11:12 AM mikester If I'm required to pass the tail pipe test and... Aug 25 2004, 11:56 AM lapuwali That's the idea of dropping the visual, which ... Aug 25 2004, 12:19 PM Cloudbuster ... Aug 25 2004, 12:45 PM lapuwali The bill DOESN'T add '66 - '75 cars ba... Aug 25 2004, 01:09 PM SirAndy ... Aug 25 2004, 01:22 PM Cloudbuster ... Aug 25 2004, 02:05 PM dmenche914 The real danger is if the 35 year classic exemptin... Aug 25 2004, 02:55 PM lapuwali Dave, you really have to stop being so angry over ... Aug 25 2004, 04:07 PM Headrage Another update. Don't know what it means when... Aug 26 2004, 12:46 PM lapuwali Rule 77 (looked this up) has to do with procedures... Aug 26 2004, 01:28 PM Headrage Anyone know how we could collectively oppose this ... Aug 26 2004, 01:31 PM Headrage Here's another update. What the hell does all... Aug 27 2004, 10:56 AM Headrage Sorry, was so pissed I forgot to add the link. :an... Aug 27 2004, 11:00 AM dflesburg What do you expect from the place that made it oka... Aug 27 2004, 11:17 AM mikester I know they are trying to get this in before the s... Aug 27 2004, 11:49 AM fiid QUOTE
Headrage Actually wouldn't it be '76 and older if i... Aug 27 2004, 12:14 PM lapuwali Yes, but if this bill passes into law, the cutoff ... Aug 27 2004, 12:26 PM Headrage I don't know if this is good or bad. I notice... Aug 28 2004, 09:44 PM Headrage :bump: Aug 29 2004, 03:40 PM dmenche914 Not a clue what that means, but there is the the A... Aug 29 2004, 04:55 PM ! It's dead....2nd year bills rarely pass..... Aug 29 2004, 05:56 PM Brando my comment from this post on PAPBB:
California al... Aug 29 2004, 09:24 PM ! First off...MOST if not ALL of the crappy re-tread... Aug 29 2004, 09:29 PM
lapuwali QUOTE
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th July 2025 - 08:50 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2025 IPS, Inc.