In search of: a $250 digital camera, NPC, but I would like to buy my 1st one |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
In search of: a $250 digital camera, NPC, but I would like to buy my 1st one |
ThinAir |
Oct 8 2004, 09:46 PM
Post
#21
|
Best friends Group: Members Posts: 2,542 Joined: 4-February 03 From: Flagstaff, AZ Member No.: 231 Region Association: Southwest Region |
I made my first digital camera purchase this summer after a lot of research. I went with the Canon A75 and am very glad that I did. I wanted the slightly larger LCD on the back and didn't want to spend extra bucks for the swivel screen on the A80. I also felt that 3.2mp was just fine for my needs.
My biggest concern was getting good sky colors. I've had too many times of getting back from a trip and discovering that the beautiful blue sky with white puffy clouds behind the Eiffel Tour came out all washed out. I tested the Canon on this before I purchased it and I've been very pleased with the results. From my research it seems that Canon has done more work on scene analysis than any other manufacturer to make sure that stuff comes out right. The A75 also gives me lots of manual controls so that when I want I can make it do whatever I want. At high resolution the movies are even pretty good and I haven't used my video camera since I bought the Canon. My only complaint is that at high res you can only take a 30 second video regardless of how much capacity your compact flash card has. Having a camera that felt good in my hand was very important. Using a CF card and AA batteries were the other things on my list and the A75 fit the bill all the way around. Like others have said, there are lots of them on the market, but Canon gets my vote - especially the A75. |
Bruce Allert |
Oct 9 2004, 12:14 AM
Post
#22
|
Hellions asleep Group: Members Posts: 3,289 Joined: 19-March 03 From: Eagle Creek, Orygun Member No.: 441 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
First thing for you to do is go to the magazine rack and find one that has alot of ads. Most big sellers of digital cameras take out 1, 2 and 3 page ads listing all the neat cameras for sale including a small blurb of what each camera is capeable of doing. The 3 mega pixal cameras are getting really cheap and for what you want to do with it should be sufficient.
Next, go on line to consumer reports and browse their recomended best buys. They will even tell you what the camera can do and ease of operation. B & H photo on line will have a list of really great deals too (mail order stuff). Rather than buying from a picture it's best that you find what you think you're gonna like and then find it at a store & handle it. I, personally, do not like a small camera because it's hard to hold on to. Fingers get in the way too. The camera Geoff suggested is a great deal, a nice camera and available most everywhere. I will be upgrading to a Canon Digital Rebel with 6.3 MP. It's a SLR digital and I can change lenses with my other Canon cameras. There's a lot to look at and take some time to check them out or you might end up with something that's hard to operate & doesn't make you happy with it's results. .....b |
Bleyseng |
Oct 9 2004, 08:42 AM
Post
#23
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,034 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
I also don't like the cameras with too many optional things. Too many funny sounds when the shutter clicks etc. I like a camera that shoots great pics. More...forget the cameras than tout all the killer options, bells and whistles as its just too effin confusing trying to change the setup. 90% of the shots I do are on auto! You don't have time nor remember how to scroll thru to figure out how to setup a "backlit party shot" waste of money! I do love the mpeg stuff and have taken 15 30 sec movies and made a complete movie using Vegas with blends and fades. Now that is cool. I will do a video of DHunts engine blow/fire off party on Sat.
Even my 82 year old Dad can work the Nikon 3700 forget using my Nikon 5000. Geoff (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (what the hell was a trying to say...I was out until 2AM last night drinking Mojitos with the guys) This post has been edited by Bleyseng: Oct 9 2004, 10:49 AM |
seanery |
Oct 9 2004, 08:50 AM
Post
#24
|
waiting to rebuild whitey! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 15,852 Joined: 7-January 03 From: Indy Member No.: 100 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(Bleyseng @ Oct 9 2004, 09:42 AM) I also don't think the cameras with too many optional things. Too many funny sounds when the shutter clicks etc. I like a camera that shoots great pics. Geoff (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) me too! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) my camera makes me look good |
Rhodes71/914 |
Oct 9 2004, 09:48 AM
Post
#25
|
Glacier Group: Members Posts: 1,374 Joined: 8-August 04 From: End of the Road, Alaska Member No.: 2,482 |
Canon or Nikon. You don't need more than 3 mega pixels for your first digital camera. I would also say go for lithium rechargable batt. digital cameras are notorious for eating batt. And difinitely get a large memory card I like 256MB but go 512MB if you can spend the money. I have a canon s50 and it is so much better than the kodak I left on the hood of my Land Rover.
|
p914 |
Oct 9 2004, 10:52 AM
Post
#26
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 518 Joined: 7-September 03 From: Sunny South Florida Member No.: 1,117 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(Headrage @ Oct 8 2004, 06:38 PM) P914, put the arm down. Please. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Costco has the 512 mem card for the A75 for $45 now. |
anthony |
Oct 9 2004, 11:39 AM
Post
#27
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218 |
QUOTE You don't need more than 3 mega pixels for your first digital camera. I'd buy at least a 4 megapixel camera. I think that's the price/performance sweetspot now. |
ThinAir |
Oct 9 2004, 11:44 AM
Post
#28
|
Best friends Group: Members Posts: 2,542 Joined: 4-February 03 From: Flagstaff, AZ Member No.: 231 Region Association: Southwest Region |
Here's the web sites that I used for research before I decided on the Canon A75:
Steve's Digicams http://www.steves-digicams.com/ Digital Camera HQ http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/ Digital Camera Resource Page http://www.dcresource.com/ I particularly appreciated Steve's Digicams because he really is independent and he provides actual shots that show you just exactly what the camera did in a given situation. |
Bleyseng |
Oct 9 2004, 12:23 PM
Post
#29
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,034 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Checked your review sites and the Nikon is still $153 at Butterflyphoto.com
|
anthony |
Oct 9 2004, 12:34 PM
Post
#30
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218 |
www.dpreview.com is also a great site for reviews though they tend to focus on higher end cameras. I like the Canon A85. The primary difference between it and the A70 is 4 megapixels and a larger swing out/swivel lcd panel. The swing out LCDs are really nice and let you easily get low shots and overhead shots. It also makes it easy to turn it 180 degrees and take a picture of yourself.
|
brant |
Oct 9 2004, 12:42 PM
Post
#31
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,624 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Wow,
thanks for the education everyone... I feel like I just learned a ton. sounds like I need to buy the memory card and batteries on top of my selection no mater which the front runners that I'm seeing in this thread are: - cannon A75: ($179) 3.2MP and 3X optical (4 alk. bat.) - cannon A85: ($234) 4MP and 3X optical (4 alkaline bat) - nikon cool pix 3700 ($153) 3.2MP and 3x opt. (in battery section it says: 1X but nothing else specified) - nikon cool pix 3200 ($162) 3.2MP and 3X opt. (bat. says: 2X but nothing more is specified?) - olypus C-740 Ultra ($239) 3.18MP and 10X opt. (Says: standard/CRV3 Lithium) just a couple of more questions. 1) am I correct that I can add memory to any newer made camera? 2) am I correct that I can purchase these lithium batteries or MH batteries as an option? Can a AA battery style camera interchange with Lithium, or do I need to factor this into the decision from the git go. 3) I'm confused about the mention of MH batteries I guess versus the Lithium. 3) for those of you with the Nikons, what batteries do they take? 4) is 10X optical zoom going to be better for car parts pictures and does this make the olympus superior? thanks again brant |
ThinAir |
Oct 9 2004, 01:03 PM
Post
#32
|
Best friends Group: Members Posts: 2,542 Joined: 4-February 03 From: Flagstaff, AZ Member No.: 231 Region Association: Southwest Region |
1) Yes. My decision on what kind of card I wanted was based upon wanting to use it with either Windoze or Linux. I felt that Compact Flash had the highest chance of doing that.
2) Your camera may come with Alkaline batteries in the box, but those are the last Alkaline batteries you should use in the camera. You will use them up very quickly. After that, get some rechargeable NMH (Nickel Metal Hydride) or Lithium batteries and use them over and over. Which of these that you get would be determined by whether your cameral manufacturer has some note that says only use this or don't use that. For myself, I would not buy a camera that uses a proprietary battery instead of AAs. The cost of replacing the battery will quickly exceed the cost of the camera. I found a charger at Sam's Club that works from a/c or the power outlet in my car. It came with 4 15-minute recharge NMH batteries and was less than $30. 4) Optical zoom is always better than digital zoom (at least on paper). Used properly, I've seen demonstrations of very good results from digital zoom. The secret seems to be in framing the photo properly to begin with so that you don't manipulate its size after the fact. What level of zoom you need (3x or 10x) is probably determined by what you want to shoot. For close-ups many cameras offer a macro mode so that you can get very close. I'm still learning how to use that on my A75. |
anthony |
Oct 9 2004, 01:16 PM
Post
#33
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218 |
Whatever you do make sure you have at least two sets of batteries.
Also, go down to bestbuy or whatever place is closest to you and figure out which cameras you like by feel. You can look at specs forever but you also want a camera that is comfortable to use. I don't mind proprietary batteries since they usually result in a lighter overall camera. If you buy non-brand name proprietary batteries you can find them very cheap. I just bought two high capacity batteries for my Canon S400 for a grand total of $11.50 including shipping (ebay). |
bob91403 |
Oct 9 2004, 04:04 PM
Post
#34
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 618 Joined: 15-September 04 From: Los Angeles, CA Member No.: 2,763 |
3X optical zoom is fine for your average snapshot. If you ever want to take shots at a track forget it. Not enough zoom. The 10x seems like a hell of a lot more for the money. Decide what camera you want. Then find out what type memory card and battery it takes. Buy them through ebay as well. Most of the time it's half the price of most retail outlets.
|
tat2dphreak |
Oct 11 2004, 01:06 PM
Post
#35
|
stoya, stoya, stoya Group: Benefactors Posts: 8,797 Joined: 6-June 03 From: Wylie, TX Member No.: 792 Region Association: Southwest Region |
I have a canon powershot A40... 2.1MP and 1600x1200 pics turn out great! I have never had a complaint and they are available for under $200 now... in a 3MP version (A75) great, simple to use little camera with great features...
|
Bruce Allert |
Oct 11 2004, 02:13 PM
Post
#36
|
Hellions asleep Group: Members Posts: 3,289 Joined: 19-March 03 From: Eagle Creek, Orygun Member No.: 441 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
QUOTE(bob91403 @ Oct 9 2004, 03:04 PM) The 10x seems like a hell of a lot more for the money. Decide what camera you want. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) 10x is the way to go & if you can get one with image stabilizing it's even better. I have a 10x and I can read license plates in parking lots with it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/clap56.gif) .....b |
mikester |
Oct 11 2004, 02:48 PM
Post
#37
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 326 Joined: 18-June 03 From: CA Member No.: 837 |
I've had one of these for 2 years and couldn't be happier.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detai...=glance&s=photo It comes with a rechargable battery and charger - is small and takes great pics for a 2MP camera. Frankly unless your a pro I just don't think you need more than that. The newer versions of it are even better (smaller too). I put a 128MB card in mine and never run out of room taking pics at 1024x768. I also like that A70 (I think) which I got for my dad a while back - it was just as good but not as small and didn't have the rechargable batteries. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 05:49 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |