Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Carb Revolution, A shortage of capable 914 mechanics?
JawjaPorsche
post Jun 22 2012, 01:47 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,463
Joined: 23-July 11
From: Clayton, Georgia
Member No.: 13,351
Region Association: South East States



I have noticed a lot of 914's for sale lately on Ebay, Craiglist, and here on 914World that have carbs. I was wondering what prompted these owners to scrap their FI for carbs? As a original owner of a 914 I know you have to stay on top of the FI system with maintenance and tender care. Was it because some teeners exchanged owners so much that it was easier to switch to carbs than to chase the FI problem? Or was it because there is a shortage of capable 914 FI mechanics that understand the D-Jet system or L-Jet system? This is not a knock on teener owners that have carbs. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pt_700
post Jun 22 2012, 01:50 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,108
Joined: 4-March 10
From: san jose, ca
Member No.: 11,430
Region Association: Northern California



i think it's absolutely a shortage of the skills required to keep these old f.i. systems operating properly.

i was almost there and might have well scrapped my d-jet. after going through the basics and still having no luck i took it to a local specialist and it turned out to be the e.c.u. cost me $600 to find that out though, probably about what i'd spend on a decent carb setup...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stuttgart46
post Jun 22 2012, 02:01 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 305
Joined: 17-December 07
From: Santa Monica, CA
Member No.: 8,474
Region Association: None



I got my first 914 in '89 and it seemed like the rule of thumb then was that you had to go to carbs if you wanted to go faster. IMHO, a lot of mechanics back then seemed intimidated by FI. I know it had been around a long time by then but working and tweaking carbs was easier for most.
I didn't really appreciate the reliability of FI until the last few years myself.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
poorsche914
post Jun 22 2012, 02:49 PM
Post #4


T4 Supercharged
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,133
Joined: 28-May 09
From: Smoky Mountains
Member No.: 10,419
Region Association: South East States



Could be both lack of FI knowledge as well as prior owners who had no clue. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
I had a 2.0 built in the mid '80s and had dual carbs installed. The guy doing the build asked "Really?" and since I had already bought the carbs, he went ahead and used them. Looking back, I had no idea that staying with the FI would have been "better".

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SUNAB914
post Jun 22 2012, 03:07 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 698
Joined: 29-December 08
From: Fredericksburg VA
Member No.: 9,880
Region Association: South East States



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) yep
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yeahmag
post Jun 22 2012, 04:42 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,448
Joined: 18-April 05
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 3,946
Region Association: Southern California



You can't make radical changes to the motor with the stock F.I. That's the only reason I changed...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smj
post Jun 22 2012, 10:10 PM
Post #7


"Dude, Steve from Berkeley."
***

Group: Members
Posts: 591
Joined: 28-August 05
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 4,691
Region Association: Northern California



How's the availability of new/reconditioned parts? Based on a recent conversation offline, I'm wondering if cost or lack of parts might drive conversions in the future...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
obscurity
post Jun 23 2012, 12:54 PM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 411
Joined: 24-February 06
From: Atlanta ,GA
Member No.: 5,628
Region Association: South East States



I think the lack of FI knowledge is the answer. There were not that many FI cars in the 70s and early 80s and even fewer mechanics who know how to work on it. As a result when something went wrong there was a tendency to blame the FI and the obvious solution was carbs.

John
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
damesandhotrods
post Jun 23 2012, 01:31 PM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 568
Joined: 26-September 10
From: Santa Cruz California
Member No.: 12,218
Region Association: Northern California



I have meet so many people that flat out did not want to learn fuel injection then those that couldn’t learn. And a large chunk of these “mechanics” also flat out refused to use the proper tools to set up and tune carbs. If it wasn’t for smog laws even more of them would have been converted.

I also think that because the 914 was an entry level Porsche, many people that were not in a position to maintain them properly bought them and drove them into the ground.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KELTY360
post Jun 23 2012, 03:03 PM
Post #10


914 Neferati
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,128
Joined: 31-December 05
From: Pt. Townsend, WA
Member No.: 5,344
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



The internet wasn't around to provide such robust information and support on mysterious systems. People were pretty much on their own and took the most expeditious way to keep their cars on the road. Look at all the encouragement new owners get nowadays to retain the FI. Many more would have switched to carbs if not for sites like this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
moparrob
post Jun 23 2012, 03:19 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 27-April 10
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 11,663
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Katmanken
post Jun 23 2012, 03:43 PM
Post #12


You haven't seen me if anybody asks...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,738
Joined: 14-June 03
From: USA
Member No.: 819
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Advertising convinced a lot of people that more power was yours by merely removing the fuel injection system and going to one or two carbs. Some people equate engine performance to "cool" noises so the extra induction noise (and small reduction in flow resistance) was definitely perceived as a large HP gain by some.

Realistically, the size of your air charge size sets how much fuel can be burned so adding carbs either reduced power (single carb mix and flow issues), did nothing, or made a little extra power by over-richening the fuel/air ratio and/ or reducing intake flow losses.

Adding a cam with dual carbs could actually add more power but that involved an expensive engine teardown and a rebuild.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jmill
post Jun 23 2012, 03:49 PM
Post #13


Green Hornet
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,449
Joined: 9-May 08
From: Racine, Wisconsin
Member No.: 9,038
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(damesandhotrods @ Jun 23 2012, 02:31 PM) *

I have met so many people that flat out did not want to learn fuel injection then those that couldn’t learn....

If it wasn’t for smog laws even more of them would have been converted....



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

I'm one of those that like carbs. I even like MFI. They are both mechanical devices that I understand. In general people tend to stick to what they know. It's not that I can't learn FI I just haven't had a good enough reason to educate myself on it. Keeping your car smog legal and registered is a good enough reason for most. I just don't happen to have that issue in my State.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cvdmolen
post Jun 23 2012, 03:55 PM
Post #14


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 2-April 12
From: Wageningen, NL
Member No.: 14,329
Region Association: Europe



8 years ago I started working on old VW's with the D-jet and after a while the D-jet (and the L-Jet) are not that difficult to understand. I see myself as a teener (33 / build year 1978), I disagree that teeners can't work with this system.
The most common mistake people & teeners make is that they overlook the basic engine setup which is far more important than the injection system. But a lot of people see a lot of wires and go mad, instead of following simple things as timing / valve clearance / compression and the most of all the mistakes -> air lekkage before the cilinder head (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Internet did help me find a book of the 80's with all the knowledge you needed to know, a simple flow chart.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Amphicar770
post Jun 23 2012, 03:56 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,216
Joined: 20-April 10
From: PA, USA
Member No.: 11,639
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



When the 914 came out, not many mechanics understood fuel injection and took the attitude that carbs were good enuff fer my daddy and his daddy so I ain't gonna learn no forun car VW stuff that you don't see on Ford or Chevy.

By the time FI became common, most of the guys who did know anything about the 914 had retired. Thus, a definite skills gap.

The previous owner of my 914 spent over $2 grand getting the FI sorted out.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Jun 23 2012, 04:21 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,825
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



Another reason is that diagnostic equipment for FI did not exist in the 70's.

Even the oscilloscopes they had then were analog and could not even store a waveform.
Now they have digital logic FI monitors that give you all the information over the equivalent of a USB port. Any computer becomes the diag. equipment.

Troubleshooting a FI system in the 70s-90s required trial and error and often 'known good components' to swap out with the suspect ones to eliminate the culprit. Owners usually do not have extra parts laying around to test that.

When I converted my first 914 to carbs it was because I got it non-running with the FI in a box and I had more experience with carbs. Had it running for ~$700 with Dellortos.

Now I converted my latest because it is a race car and
QUOTE
You can't make radical changes to the motor with the stock F.I.


Stu
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Jun 24 2012, 07:18 AM
Post #17


Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out.
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,240
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's Bell. The BELL!
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



when carb conversions were all the rage consider the price of NEW fi items. looking thru the AA catalog at new list prices back in the day...

mps new-1.7 $1411.18
2.0 $1370.97

fuel injectors new-$398.10 to $270.79

tps new $171.70 to $354.00

check out the pricing for various engine harnesses.

pretty staggering considering those were prices during the 70's not including labor. hell, a new oem 2.0 air filter housing was $1278.23. wtf!

"well sir, the mps in your 73' 2.0 is bad. that will be $1370 plus labor and tax. or we can just put carbs on it for you much cheaper".

k
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porschef
post Jun 24 2012, 09:47 AM
Post #18


How you doin'
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,180
Joined: 7-September 10
From: LawnGuyland
Member No.: 12,152
Region Association: North East States



After doing my engine swap from a 2.0 Djet to a 2056 w Ljet, I really have to say that trial and error is the only way to figger out some stuff. I have also found the Ljet to be a lot more simple, what with no trigger points, nor that mystical magical MPS... The main problems I had were 3 bad injectors, and a coupla vacuum leaks. Since then the car has run very well.

I still am not certain of the mixture, she seems to be running a bit rich, as I've gone through the exhaust for leaks, but I'm still getting some minor backfiring under decel in gear...

To me, the best way to check was to crank the engine with the injectors removed from the engine and squirting fuel into small jars; I used some prescription vials. If you're not getting the appropriate amount of fuel, then start working back from there, which may include swapping injectors from one cyl to another...

Then eliminate vacuum leaks...

It's time consuming, but not that difficult. ** Be the fuel injection** (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elliot Cannon
post Jun 24 2012, 11:55 AM
Post #19


914 Guru
*****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 8,487
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast)
Member No.: 7,407
Region Association: None



My engine produced 147 hp on the dyno. How could I have done that with a stock fuel injection? It seems if you want more than a good running stock horse power engine, you go with carbs. (Or an expensive after market F.I. system).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bembry
post Jun 24 2012, 03:36 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 529
Joined: 29-July 05
From: Bakersfield, CA
Member No.: 4,499
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Well--I'll be honest. My FI was kicking my ass. My motor was shot too, and there were so many issues, I just have up and carbed it. Now I have a built 2056, so no FI anyway. I know how nice the FI can be, but damn..it is nice to drive my car on a regualr basis rather than chasing down FI issues. No regrets...I also have the FI stuff in a box if I ever need it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2025 - 12:49 AM