Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Velocity stack testing!, Been playing on the dyno again!
Jake Raby
post Nov 9 2004, 04:29 PM
Post #1


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Yep,
Remember the posts about URY and his "too tall" stacks??

I decided to post the data from my latest engine combo as i try to find the perfect stack arrangement for it..

Guys wanting a cheaper, reliable TIV engine will love this one because it has a ton of torque and awesome smoothness. It does NOT have ported heads, so its almost 1,000.00 cheaper than some of its bigger brothers and makes torque very similar, but does not have the RPM range.. Ultimate daily drivin, short shiftin, 901 abusin power- plant..

Anyway, look at these plots and descriptions for this engine here
http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=80579

I plan on replicating this exact test on the next 10 engines I dyno and see how port work and cam changes effect the results.

The results from this engine do not follow suite with my earlier findings, but almost all those tests were done on high revvin engines....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Nov 9 2004, 04:36 PM
Post #2


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,319
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Wow, the 6" stacks are sort of a wierd curve? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) I like the results on the 2.65's though! Cool stuff Jake! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/clap56.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 9 2004, 04:43 PM
Post #3


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Thanks!
Yep, the 6" stacks are all over the place....

Thats what i have seen before, but typically they make a bigger impact up top in the powerband and hurt power more there. My guess is that these test progress to higher tuned engines I will yet again see this.

This engine has a slow piston speed, and high velocity heads with a huge split in the duration between intake and exhaust on the cam. The tuning is effecting my results with this one, but thats why I'm doing more of them back to back.

The tests are fast and easy because it only takes a few minutes to swap them out and unless they effect jetting no other changes are made..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Nov 9 2004, 04:49 PM
Post #4


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,319
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



One of my costomers with a 1750 356 and 44's will like to hear about this. Thanks again. This sort of testing rocks! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/mueba.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/aktion035.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 9 2004, 04:51 PM
Post #5


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



The 356 is a totally different world...

The best stacks I ever found for them were around 3" tall...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Nov 9 2004, 07:27 PM
Post #6


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,544
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



Jake,

About a month ago I took your advice and changed my 6" to 1-7/8" from Aircooled.net.
And I reinstalled the K&N filters.

Do I feel a change?...not really, but my engine needs a overhaul anyway.

I'm glad I was able to spark your interest in doing these tests.
Once again you come through with real world, tested, and verified info.

Now can my daughter use this for her science fair project? I bet she'd be the only third grader with a velocity stack comparison.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 9 2004, 08:08 PM
Post #7


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



That would be cool!!

The higher the engine is tuned, the more you will notice the changes from the stack variations.

Thats why I'm gonna do this more..... The next 10 engines I have lined up is a very good mix of sizes and tuning from a 1911 clear to a 2563....

Did you change your jetting after you changed the stacks??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Nov 9 2004, 08:38 PM
Post #8


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,544
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Nov 9 2004, 06:08 PM)


Did you change your jetting after you changed the stacks??

No I didn't but I'll look and see what I'm running now and what sizes I have.

Paul

BTW, I was kidding about the science fair thing. We're going to do a compairson between fiberglass, wood and carbonfiber. We're going to make F/G and C/F the same size as a wooden paint stiring stick. We'll put a weight on them and see which one bends the most.
Simple.(IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 9 2004, 08:56 PM
Post #9


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Check on the jets...

That sounds cool.... for the science fair..

Safer than mine, I made some home made napalm from the old styrofoam stuff and melted my desk the first time I showed the teacher....

She thought it was gonna be a volcano!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brett W
post Nov 9 2004, 11:23 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,856
Joined: 17-September 03
From: huntsville, al
Member No.: 1,169
Region Association: None



Thanks for showing that. Now people won't look at me wierd when I take the 6 inchers of their car and throw them across the yard.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nebreitling
post Nov 9 2004, 11:28 PM
Post #11


Member Emeritus
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-March 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 478



that's hilarious jake!


they took all the fun stuff out of chemistry sets about the time i was born... still managed to blow some beakers up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 9 2004, 11:47 PM
Post #12


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Brett, I had you in mind as well when I did the testing..

I'm gonna play with a bunch more combosand I just found my 4" stacks a few minutes ago while looking for my spray gun to paint the interior of the new shop!

Damn place looks like the OR at the local hospital! Its so bright inside that I'll need shades to assemble things!

The decks are super glossy epoxy and the walls are 3 coats of the same paint used on the underside of Delta aircraft.... every bench is stainless steel.. Its bitchin!
BTW, I guess no one noticed those NOS foggers in the manifolds.....

You should see what it did when I sprayed the juice to it!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bperry
post Nov 10 2004, 12:09 AM
Post #13


Lurker
**

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 16-February 04
From: Dallas, Tx
Member No.: 1,661



Just curious:
Is there interaction between the stack height/size and the
intake manifold height/size?
I ask because I seem to remember that either SCCA or PCA
had some new rules for Carbs that require the use of the Pierce
manifolds which are shorter than the CB ones.

--- bill
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 10 2004, 12:40 AM
Post #14


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



absolutely... We are fighting with SCCA right now about the manifold situation... The Pierce manifold is still too tall for high revs and it is not the correct size under the butterfly for a 40mm carb, its like 48-50mm!

everything changes when the manidfold length changes, the CB manifold is a great street manifold, so I'm using it for the base for the testing..

I'll have 4 production engines to test this on very soon, as well as manifold length..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Nov 10 2004, 05:29 AM
Post #15


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,925
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



I'm running 2" stacks on my race engines. I think I got them from PMO, same place I got my good manifolds.
I hope to have some more soon, to send down to you Jake.

You didn't show the 1.7" stacks in your pics. Are they the cast plates that have no bell shape?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Nov 10 2004, 09:59 AM
Post #16


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



No, they are the stock dellorto stack....

Thanks for the work on the manifold stuff with SCCA Chris..

BTW, when are you sending down the rest of your goodies?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Bob
post Nov 10 2004, 10:41 AM
Post #17


Retired admin, banned a few times
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,427
Joined: 24-December 02
From: Boulder CO
Member No.: 5
Region Association: None



Speaking of stacks.....does anyone have a line on some "interesting" stack cover/cleaners? Frankenstealth has the typical water shields...but since it is a rustypieceofshit and will never see the rain....it also does not have a top....I would like to dress up the intakes.... <_<
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
spunone
post Nov 12 2004, 09:15 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 945
Joined: 6-April 04
From: Anaheim CA
Member No.: 1,901
Region Association: Southern California



Hey Jake of the different stacks I make 90% are 3.5 inches tall don't know why but thought i'd pass it along (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HarveyH
post Nov 12 2004, 09:35 AM
Post #19


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 450
Joined: 19-June 03
From: Downingtown, PA
Member No.: 843



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif) Hijack Alert (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif)
URY914 said:
QUOTE
BTW, I was kidding about the science fair thing. We're going to do a compairson between fiberglass, wood and carbonfiber. We're going to make F/G and C/F the same size as a wooden paint stiring stick. We'll put a weight on them and see which one bends the most.

I used to work at GE Aerospace, and I remember them making an antenna boom out of unidirectional graphite fiber - epoxy that was effectivly the dimensions of a 4" diameter pipe, 28 feet long. My understanding was that they hung 60,000 lbs off of the end of this thing (fully cantilevered) as a proof load (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif) End Hijack (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif)

Harvey
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th May 2024 - 07:43 AM