Calling Rick. I screwed up my door gaps, Yet another victim... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Calling Rick. I screwed up my door gaps, Yet another victim... |
brant |
Aug 6 2013, 07:56 AM
Post
#21
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,632 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
When you welded the plates in you should have put the heat on the plates and flow the welds out into the long in short bursts. (apply heat from thick to thin) Next... Mig welders have a trigger so you can stop too. You had the heat setting correct for thin sheetmetal but not hot enough to get good penetration and heat transfer into the plates which is why the beads are narrow and tall. (proud). The multiple passes look pulled when you should have pushed the gun. Gun was moving to fast where the wire just piled up like traffic on the 405. Not sure what the purpose of the car is but those welds at the foot plates would not pass tech inspection and will raise some stink eye. Lot of porosity. Not trying to be critical just observant. Take it as a learning experience. The good news the gap issue is not as bad as one might think. You put a lot of heat into a small area. You also put a lot of heat primarily on the top of the long not the sides or bottom. The top is short and now has a bow to it. What moved? The long did and the quarter panel came forward. Next lesson -door bars or some kind of bracing are not optional. Have to mechanically resist the the shrink and slow way down with the gun. Support the center section of the tub at minimum of 4 corners. How to correct it.. you could bang on the hinge pillar. The door will sag more if you bang on the lower hinge pocket. If you bang on the upper pocket the gap will actually get tighter at the door/ qtr bottom rear and sit high at the beltline. Beat on both and you might end up with a compromise that works for you. Push the door opening with a porto-power and the qtr panel/ lock pillar will move outward. I would try that first and see if he door opening can be squared while watching the lock pillar for deflection. More heat? oh no no no! Celette bench and pull? Not unless you want two 914s. My thoughts to get it right you will probably need to slice, sleeve and weld the long. Double the gap you are trying to achieve and it will shrink back about 4-5 mm. If its a race car and the gaps cause you not to lose sleep - grind the welds down at the plates and use larger diameter MIG wire. Do short bursts like plugs that overlap each other half way through the last one. Put the heat into the plates with a bit of overlap into the long. See if the car can be corner balanced without to much issue. If it can bolt in the cage and go. Jeff, this is an amazing post. Very informative can you explain why the tip should have been pushed instead of pulled? thanks for your time brant |
Jeff Hail |
Aug 6 2013, 08:50 AM
Post
#22
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,141 Joined: 3-May 07 From: LA/ CA Member No.: 7,712 |
When you welded the plates in you should have put the heat on the plates and flow the welds out into the long in short bursts. (apply heat from thick to thin) Next... Mig welders have a trigger so you can stop too. You had the heat setting correct for thin sheetmetal but not hot enough to get good penetration and heat transfer into the plates which is why the beads are narrow and tall. (proud). The multiple passes look pulled when you should have pushed the gun. Gun was moving to fast where the wire just piled up like traffic on the 405. Not sure what the purpose of the car is but those welds at the foot plates would not pass tech inspection and will raise some stink eye. Lot of porosity. Not trying to be critical just observant. Take it as a learning experience. The good news the gap issue is not as bad as one might think. You put a lot of heat into a small area. You also put a lot of heat primarily on the top of the long not the sides or bottom. The top is short and now has a bow to it. What moved? The long did and the quarter panel came forward. Next lesson -door bars or some kind of bracing are not optional. Have to mechanically resist the the shrink and slow way down with the gun. Support the center section of the tub at minimum of 4 corners. How to correct it.. you could bang on the hinge pillar. The door will sag more if you bang on the lower hinge pocket. If you bang on the upper pocket the gap will actually get tighter at the door/ qtr bottom rear and sit high at the beltline. Beat on both and you might end up with a compromise that works for you. Push the door opening with a porto-power and the qtr panel/ lock pillar will move outward. I would try that first and see if he door opening can be squared while watching the lock pillar for deflection. More heat? oh no no no! Celette bench and pull? Not unless you want two 914s. My thoughts to get it right you will probably need to slice, sleeve and weld the long. Double the gap you are trying to achieve and it will shrink back about 4-5 mm. If its a race car and the gaps cause you not to lose sleep - grind the welds down at the plates and use larger diameter MIG wire. Do short bursts like plugs that overlap each other half way through the last one. Put the heat into the plates with a bit of overlap into the long. See if the car can be corner balanced without to much issue. If it can bolt in the cage and go. Jeff, this is an amazing post. Very informative can you explain why the tip should have been pushed instead of pulled? thanks for your time brant Pushing and pulling the weld each has a place and reason. Will try to make it short. When pushed will keep the puddle hot and molten longer. The weld will tend to be smoother,lay down flatter and be less porous on thick to thin sheetmetal. Each bead, consecutive overlapping plug or squeeze of the trigger will flow into each other instead of cooling so quickly it stands on top of the last pass. In this case would have actually reduced the amount of wire needed= less gun time =less heatsinking to the long. Practice and technique! |
ThePaintedMan |
Aug 6 2013, 10:41 AM
Post
#23
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,886 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States |
Thanks for the opinions everyone.
I agree Jeff, your advice makes particular sense to me. You also hit the nail on the head. I had traditionally always "pulled" my welds, since most of what I have done has been thin sheet metal. This was my first attempt at something this thick, and the issue was made more complex with the combination of the thick plates and thin longs. Welding dissimilar thicknesses is something I'd really like to improve my skills on. Here is the dilemma then: I understand that I will need to grind down the welds and basically start over. But then I'll be putting more heat into an already shrunken length. Do I need to just brace this much better than before and use jackstands this time? Also, I'm trying to conceptualize the loss in length that both Rick and Jeff outlined. If my measurements of the windshield frame to targa roll bar are the same for both sides, how could the top of the long have shrunken without changing that dimension? |
Jeff Hail |
Aug 6 2013, 11:12 AM
Post
#24
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,141 Joined: 3-May 07 From: LA/ CA Member No.: 7,712 |
The changes in the gaps are perceived to be greater than actual. Heat concentration was low so the affect was down low in the tub. I would bet your windshield header to targa bar did not move at all. Picture the bottom edge of the door as a horizontal lever with its pivot at the lower hinge, the pivot didn't change.. the long below it did.
Upper body stayed and the lower body got shorter. Imagine a 3 foot long 1/2 inch thick metal rod. Now bend the rod -it's still basically 3 feet long with a bend in it. Not 100% because the inside radius shortened and the outside stretched but close enough to visualize. The overall datum length is shorter but the rod is still 3 feet long at the surface. |
chad newton |
Aug 6 2013, 11:44 AM
Post
#25
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 110 Joined: 26-August 11 From: behind the red curtain Member No.: 13,491 Region Association: None |
Ok, I will have to do mine soon. Should I pull doors, weld one bar at the top one at the bottom of each door, and put on jack stands? I couldn't see anything move then, but I could be wrong. I imagine even just one at the top of each door would be sufficient to keep the car from buckling. Boy I'm glad I read this one, I would have just welded it in.
|
Jeff Hail |
Aug 6 2013, 12:12 PM
Post
#26
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,141 Joined: 3-May 07 From: LA/ CA Member No.: 7,712 |
Ok, I will have to do mine soon. Should I pull doors, weld one bar at the top one at the bottom of each door, and put on jack stands? I couldn't see anything move then, but I could be wrong. I imagine even just one at the top of each door would be sufficient to keep the car from buckling. Boy I'm glad I read this one, I would have just welded it in. Brace, support tub and go slowly with the fire control while watching what the chassis is doing. Switch back and forth between the driver side and passenger side to minimize shrink. This will give it a moment to cool down. By tacking from side to side the chassis should not bind up and twist. If you see gaps getting tight STOP, REGROUP AND EVALUATE. GO SLOW WITH THE FIRE. |
rick 918-S |
Aug 6 2013, 12:30 PM
Post
#27
|
Hey nice rack! -Celette Group: Members Posts: 20,477 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Now in Superior WI Member No.: 43 Region Association: Northstar Region |
The changes in the gaps are perceived to be greater than actual. Heat concentration was low so the affect was down low in the tub. I would bet your windshield header to targa bar did not move at all. Picture the bottom edge of the door as a horizontal lever with its pivot at the lower hinge, the pivot didn't change.. the long below it did. Upper body stayed and the lower body got shorter. Imagine a 3 foot long 1/2 inch thick metal rod. Now bend the rod -it's still basically 3 feet long with a bend in it. Not 100% because the inside radius shortened and the outside stretched but close enough to visualize. The overall datum length is shorter but the rod is still 3 feet long at the surface. I don't mean to come off as a know-it-all. I mean no disrespect. I need to say your theory is completely flawed. "Unit Body Construction" is not the movement of one section . The movement of the chassis in one plane effects the car in 3 dimensions. My background and foundation for my statements: I have attended ICAR training on chassis re-dimensioning. I have worked as a unit body repair tech at three other shops before opening my own shop. I was an owner/operator/ and trainer in the industry as a sole proprietor for 18 years before selling my business and starting in the insurance claims field. I had a Celette in my shop as well as a floor system that we used for light pulls that didn't require a full on engine/suspension removal to be brought back into spec. I have a Celette in my home shop. I promise I will do a training video that will aid in the understanding of what went wrong and how to think and plan a strategy for proper correction. |
Jeff Hail |
Aug 6 2013, 12:56 PM
Post
#28
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,141 Joined: 3-May 07 From: LA/ CA Member No.: 7,712 |
The changes in the gaps are perceived to be greater than actual. Heat concentration was low so the affect was down low in the tub. I would bet your windshield header to targa bar did not move at all. Picture the bottom edge of the door as a horizontal lever with its pivot at the lower hinge, the pivot didn't change.. the long below it did. Upper body stayed and the lower body got shorter. Imagine a 3 foot long 1/2 inch thick metal rod. Now bend the rod -it's still basically 3 feet long with a bend in it. Not 100% because the inside radius shortened and the outside stretched but close enough to visualize. The overall datum length is shorter but the rod is still 3 feet long at the surface. I don't mean to come off as a know-it-all. I mean no disrespect. I need to say your theory is completely flawed. "Unit Body Construction" is not the movement of one section . The movement of the chassis in one plane effects the car in 3 dimensions. My background and foundation for my statements: I have attended ICAR training on chassis re-dimensioning. I have worked as a unit body repair tech at three other shops before opening my own shop. I was an owner/operator/ and trainer in the industry as a sole proprietor for 18 years before selling my business and starting in the insurance claims field. I had a Celette in my shop as well as a floor system that we used for light pulls that didn't require a full on engine/suspension removal to be brought back into spec. I have a Celette in my home shop. I promise I will do a training video that will aid in the understanding of what went wrong and how to think and plan a strategy for proper correction. Rick, No disrespect taken. I was refraining from getting into the X,Y, Z axis subjects because that would just throw everyone that is learning a curve trying to visualize what is happening at the longs. I was attempting to confine the subject to heat dynamics and as usual I can go off into other tangents. I agree the entire unibody is affected no different than a simple box structure. I respect your credentials also and they are along the same lines as my own. So why is it auto claims suck the life energy from the human body faster than it can be put back in? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) |
chad newton |
Aug 6 2013, 12:59 PM
Post
#29
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 110 Joined: 26-August 11 From: behind the red curtain Member No.: 13,491 Region Association: None |
Would I need to run diagonal reinforcing bars connecting the two door bars to each other? That may help keep it from twisting.
|
r_towle |
Aug 6 2013, 01:20 PM
Post
#30
|
Custom Member Group: Members Posts: 24,585 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States |
The steel guy we have used on 356 car has a very large piece of plate steel on the floor.
Like 20 by 20 He just welds the car to the floor to prevent twisting. I did the same thing, but on a bench that is bolted to the floor. Car did not twist. For the longs, the factor door bar setup looks pretty complete and much more than any door bar I have seen here....it goes all the way up to the roof. Rich |
r_towle |
Aug 6 2013, 01:22 PM
Post
#31
|
Custom Member Group: Members Posts: 24,585 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States |
I recall foley telling me once that putting in an inner long kit can creat a lot of this type of movement and it might be easier to put on the outer clamshells instead...for that reason of heat and shrinking....dunno
|
rick 918-S |
Aug 6 2013, 01:31 PM
Post
#32
|
Hey nice rack! -Celette Group: Members Posts: 20,477 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Now in Superior WI Member No.: 43 Region Association: Northstar Region |
The changes in the gaps are perceived to be greater than actual. Heat concentration was low so the affect was down low in the tub. I would bet your windshield header to targa bar did not move at all. Picture the bottom edge of the door as a horizontal lever with its pivot at the lower hinge, the pivot didn't change.. the long below it did. Upper body stayed and the lower body got shorter. Imagine a 3 foot long 1/2 inch thick metal rod. Now bend the rod -it's still basically 3 feet long with a bend in it. Not 100% because the inside radius shortened and the outside stretched but close enough to visualize. The overall datum length is shorter but the rod is still 3 feet long at the surface. I don't mean to come off as a know-it-all. I mean no disrespect. I need to say your theory is completely flawed. "Unit Body Construction" is not the movement of one section . The movement of the chassis in one plane effects the car in 3 dimensions. My background and foundation for my statements: I have attended ICAR training on chassis re-dimensioning. I have worked as a unit body repair tech at three other shops before opening my own shop. I was an owner/operator/ and trainer in the industry as a sole proprietor for 18 years before selling my business and starting in the insurance claims field. I had a Celette in my shop as well as a floor system that we used for light pulls that didn't require a full on engine/suspension removal to be brought back into spec. I have a Celette in my home shop. I promise I will do a training video that will aid in the understanding of what went wrong and how to think and plan a strategy for proper correction. Rick, No disrespect taken. I was refraining from getting into the X,Y, Z axis subjects because that would just throw everyone that is learning a curve trying to visualize what is happening at the longs. I was attempting to confine the subject to heat dynamics and as usual I can go off into other tangents. I agree the entire unibody is affected no different than a simple box structure. I respect your credentials also and they are along the same lines as my own. So why is it auto claims suck the life energy from the human body faster than it can be put back in? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) Thanks for understanding. Flat text sometimes comes off as arrogant. I find it necessary to talk in X,Y,Z to prevent the beginner from focusing on the 2 dimensional problem that they "think" they created. Funny, all the years I spent in the collision business I don't do auto claims. I work as a property storm claims adjuster. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/screwy.gif) |
chad newton |
Aug 6 2013, 01:43 PM
Post
#33
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 110 Joined: 26-August 11 From: behind the red curtain Member No.: 13,491 Region Association: None |
The changes in the gaps are perceived to be greater than actual. Heat concentration was low so the affect was down low in the tub. I would bet your windshield header to targa bar did not move at all. Picture the bottom edge of the door as a horizontal lever with its pivot at the lower hinge, the pivot didn't change.. the long below it did. Upper body stayed and the lower body got shorter. Imagine a 3 foot long 1/2 inch thick metal rod. Now bend the rod -it's still basically 3 feet long with a bend in it. Not 100% because the inside radius shortened and the outside stretched but close enough to visualize. The overall datum length is shorter but the rod is still 3 feet long at the surface. I don't mean to come off as a know-it-all. I mean no disrespect. I need to say your theory is completely flawed. "Unit Body Construction" is not the movement of one section . The movement of the chassis in one plane effects the car in 3 dimensions. My background and foundation for my statements: I have attended ICAR training on chassis re-dimensioning. I have worked as a unit body repair tech at three other shops before opening my own shop. I was an owner/operator/ and trainer in the industry as a sole proprietor for 18 years before selling my business and starting in the insurance claims field. I had a Celette in my shop as well as a floor system that we used for light pulls that didn't require a full on engine/suspension removal to be brought back into spec. I have a Celette in my home shop. I promise I will do a training video that will aid in the understanding of what went wrong and how to think and plan a strategy for proper correction. Rick, No disrespect taken. I was refraining from getting into the X,Y, Z axis subjects because that would just throw everyone that is learning a curve trying to visualize what is happening at the longs. I was attempting to confine the subject to heat dynamics and as usual I can go off into other tangents. I agree the entire unibody is affected no different than a simple box structure. I respect your credentials also and they are along the same lines as my own. So why is it auto claims suck the life energy from the human body faster than it can be put back in? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) Thanks for understanding. Flat text sometimes comes off as arrogant. I find it necessary to talk in X,Y,Z to prevent the beginner form focusing on the 2 dimensional problem that they "think" they created. Funny, all the years I spent in the collision business I don't do auto claims. I work as a property storm claims adjuster. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/screwy.gif) You are probably better off. Especially when it comes to making money. |
mmcgrego |
Aug 8 2013, 08:29 PM
Post
#34
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 9-July 11 From: Guelph Ontario Member No.: 13,295 Region Association: Canada |
Would anyone mind if I temporarily hijack this thread and post a few pics of my own door issue for suggestions?
|
rick 918-S |
Aug 8 2013, 09:03 PM
Post
#35
|
Hey nice rack! -Celette Group: Members Posts: 20,477 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Now in Superior WI Member No.: 43 Region Association: Northstar Region |
|
ThePaintedMan |
Feb 18 2014, 11:55 AM
Post
#36
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,886 Joined: 6-September 11 From: St. Petersburg, FL Member No.: 13,527 Region Association: South East States |
Revisiting this, though it might not be a good time since Rick is going to be traveling down here and may not. Since I had to take the cage out to do some painting, I figured I'd take the chance to get some better measurements. What I found:
F windshield to targa bar dimension = 24 7/8 inches on both sides (spec is 25 1/8) X cross dimension = 53 1/2 inches on both side (spec is 52 5/8 inches) So it seems that the good news is if I have had any shrinkage on the longs, its equal from side to side. The bad news is that I'm certainly not very close to factory tolerances. What I can't understand is that if the distance from windshield to targa bar closed (about 3/8ths of an inch), then how is the X dimension greater now? Rich had mentioned that it might be possible to pound the recess that the door hinge bolts to inward to gain a little gap at the back of the door. I've considered this, but also thought it might be possible to remove the door, pound the riveted hinges backward a little bit, then tack weld the hinges to the door, effectively moving the door longitudinally forward a little bit. Thoughts? |
wndsnd |
Feb 18 2014, 01:36 PM
Post
#37
|
You wanted a horse, but got a goat. Nobody wants a goat.... Group: Members Posts: 2,861 Joined: 12-February 12 From: North Shore, MA Member No.: 14,124 Region Association: North East States |
|
rick 918-S |
Feb 18 2014, 01:42 PM
Post
#38
|
Hey nice rack! -Celette Group: Members Posts: 20,477 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Now in Superior WI Member No.: 43 Region Association: Northstar Region |
It a gain of mm's and a compromise to a proper repair. I will be in Fl. tomorrow but not long enough to travel to St. Pete. I would be happy to help if I could. I may be back in Fl. later in the summer if you get hit by a hurricane. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th June 2024 - 09:05 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |