off topic - Radical, Anyone have experience with these race cars |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
off topic - Radical, Anyone have experience with these race cars |
Randal |
Nov 1 2013, 08:53 AM
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
Nice hillclimb / autox(?) car for sale in the UK A Radical - 12,000 pounds sterling... What a car for the price, hey? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqoA2tMi ... e=youtu.be |
bulitt |
Nov 1 2013, 09:16 AM
Post
#2
|
Achtzylinder Group: Members Posts: 4,188 Joined: 2-October 11 Member No.: 13,632 Region Association: South East States |
I think they are awesome. Every year more used ones seem to hit the market at lower prices. I think the SR8 holds the track record on the top gear course.
SR3 It is the world’s most successful sports-racer, with over 1000 satisfied customers. The SR3 is a sure-footed, highly-developed racer, adept and rapid in the hands of both the novice trackday driver and seasoned racing professional. The SR3 is powered by the Powertec four-cylinder range of engines, from 1340cc to 1500cc and beyond. It’s a proven class winner, not only in Radical’s single-marque race series, but many other multi-marque championships around the world too. SR8 This is Radical’s ultimate racer, and it provides the definitive visceral driving experience. Physics-defying grip, relentless acceleration and powerful brakes add up to a two-seater track car that can lap Silverstone in the same time as a Formula 3 single-seater – and at a fraction of the price. The SR8 shares similar styling and safety features with its sibling the SR3 RS, but it beats with a different heart. The latest generation of Powertec’s acclaimed RP V8 engine, powers the SR8. PR6 The PR6’s central seating position chassis is Radical’s lightest and most nimble to-date. The aerodynamics are up-to-the-minute, with huge amounts of downforce being generated by the SR9 Le Mans Prototype-inspired underbody diffusers. A fully FIA tested frontal crash box and MSA approved safety cell, gives drivers the confidence to explore the limits of the PR6’s very predictable handling. |
Matt Romanowski |
Nov 1 2013, 09:16 AM
Post
#3
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 878 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Manchester, NH Member No.: 1,507 |
There are lots of Radicals around. Later ones are better than earlier. Compared to other cars in SCCA, they are too heavy and underpowered to be competitive. Google will tell you lots about them.
|
Randal |
Nov 1 2013, 11:09 AM
Post
#4
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
There are lots of Radicals around. Later ones are better than earlier. Compared to other cars in SCCA, they are too heavy and underpowered to be competitive. Google will tell you lots about them. Umm.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca2124n1-kQ not bad right off the trailer with track setup. Sure does turn. |
Rand |
Nov 1 2013, 11:41 AM
Post
#5
|
Cross Member Group: Members Posts: 7,409 Joined: 8-February 05 From: OR Member No.: 3,573 Region Association: None |
A bit squirelly. Dang I want to drive one of those.
|
richardL |
Nov 1 2013, 11:46 AM
Post
#6
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 713 Joined: 27-January 03 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 201 Region Association: None |
|
Matt Romanowski |
Nov 1 2013, 08:59 PM
Post
#7
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 878 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Manchester, NH Member No.: 1,507 |
There are lots of Radicals around. Later ones are better than earlier. Compared to other cars in SCCA, they are too heavy and underpowered to be competitive. Google will tell you lots about them. Umm.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca2124n1-kQ not bad right off the trailer with track setup. Sure does turn. Sorry, I was talking racing. They were CSR/DSR and got killed by other cars. Not sure which of the new SR classes they are in. Same story I'm sure. They are good cars, just not amazing. If you want to see something amazing, look at the Ralt or Swift FA that are converted to C or D Sports Racer. |
Randal |
Nov 3 2013, 09:20 AM
Post
#8
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
There are lots of Radicals around. Later ones are better than earlier. Compared to other cars in SCCA, they are too heavy and underpowered to be competitive. Google will tell you lots about them. Umm.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca2124n1-kQ not bad right off the trailer with track setup. Sure does turn. Sorry, I was talking racing. They were CSR/DSR and got killed by other cars. Not sure which of the new SR classes they are in. Same story I'm sure. They are good cars, just not amazing. If you want to see something amazing, look at the Ralt or Swift FA that are converted to C or D Sports Racer. What is interesting is the (used) prices and what you get for that. In my case currently not interested in track work, but one of those would make a great hill climb car and likely autox as well. Softer shocks and A15 Avons and you'd have a pretty quick autox machine. Perfect for venues like the Medford Enduro as well. I like the Ralt or Swift FA cars as well, but clearly a much bigger step. |
Matt Romanowski |
Nov 3 2013, 06:17 PM
Post
#9
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 878 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Manchester, NH Member No.: 1,507 |
If you want something to hill climb and autox, there are tons of options that are cheaper or the same as a Radical. People have put bodies on FV, FF, and FC cars for a long time. A club continental with a body would be very fast, on par with or quicker than a radical. Look at S2000 cars too.
|
Randal |
Nov 5 2013, 04:42 PM
Post
#10
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
If you want something to hill climb and autox, there are tons of options that are cheaper or the same as a Radical. People have put bodies on FV, FF, and FC cars for a long time. A club continental with a body would be very fast, on par with or quicker than a radical. Look at S2000 cars too. I like the words very fast. Throw "handle" into that sentence and I'm happy. Or give me my car with 300RWHP and I'll go away happy. And I'm not interested in running anything except a Porsche motor and I'd like it to be below 3.0 liters. A 300RWHP motor under 3.0 liters could be built, but you're looking at major money. Ahhhh.. easy to see why the $15,000 Radical looks interesting. |
Matt Romanowski |
Nov 5 2013, 06:11 PM
Post
#11
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 878 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Manchester, NH Member No.: 1,507 |
To me a $15k Radical looks like a car that is going to need $10k of work.
Remember, everyone's version of "race ready" is different. |
Randal |
Nov 5 2013, 09:19 PM
Post
#12
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
To me a $15k Radical looks like a car that is going to need $10k of work. Remember, everyone's version of "race ready" is different. Spent a lot of time on the UK hillclimb website. This is a winning car that has a lot of positive feedback. But being realistic, it will likely need work. On the other hand I doubt the owner would be cleaning up on the hills if it wasn't solid. Driving hillclimbsg, in something that isn't solid, would be pretty crazy. Not the place you want any failure. http://www.uphillracers.com/showthread.php...dical-8507.html |
Matt Romanowski |
Nov 5 2013, 09:24 PM
Post
#13
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 878 Joined: 4-January 04 From: Manchester, NH Member No.: 1,507 |
12k pounds is $20,000. In the US, a good one is ~$25k or more from what I've seen.
|
McMark |
Nov 5 2013, 09:57 PM
Post
#14
|
914 Freak! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,179 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None |
QUOTE A 300RWHP motor under 3.0 liters could be built, but you're looking at major money. Unless you go forced induction... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) |
SirAndy |
Nov 6 2013, 01:44 AM
Post
#15
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,607 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
QUOTE A 300RWHP motor under 3.0 liters could be built, but you're looking at major money. Unless you go forced induction... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) A 2.7 with a supercharger can get to 300HP at the wheels EASY ... In fact, Ferry Porsche build a 1.5L (one.point.five.liter)!!! in 1949 for Cisitalia that used a supercharger to put out 450HP. In 1949! Seriously! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/w00t.gif) |
bulitt |
Nov 6 2013, 06:13 AM
Post
#16
|
Achtzylinder Group: Members Posts: 4,188 Joined: 2-October 11 Member No.: 13,632 Region Association: South East States |
Looks like the owner swapped the Honda with a Kawasaki. Think you can also run a Busa motor and they are turning up to @290hp. 260hp package for about 7000$ And they weigh 220lbs for the engine alone yikes.
|
Randal |
Nov 6 2013, 07:31 PM
Post
#17
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
QUOTE A 300RWHP motor under 3.0 liters could be built, but you're looking at major money. Unless you go forced induction... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) I've noodled a bunch on that, but not willing to take my expensive motor and experiment. Kind of like supercharging, but just wish there was a good source for Type IV motors that was proven. Like wouldn't it be nice if there was someone like CB Performance for Type 4 induction motors. They have built hundreds of turbo motors for the sand rail fans and their failure rate is super low. On the other hand Andy's suggestion of a turbo 2.7 would definitely get the job done. Great for hill climbs, no question. Not sure how good it would be in autoxing as you'd be adding a bunch of weight. Um mm. Yea, a smaller turbo to spool up fast out of corners.. Give me torque every time. |
McMark |
Nov 6 2013, 11:49 PM
Post
#18
|
914 Freak! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,179 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None |
Now I may have to build a 2270 turbo and terrorize some AX venues. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif) I did just acquire a 912 and the would be perfect for it... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
|
Randal |
Nov 7 2013, 01:28 PM
Post
#19
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
Now I may have to build a 2270 turbo and terrorize some AX venues. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif) I did just acquire a 912 and the would be perfect for it... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) You need more than a motor to terrorize an autox venue, although if the motor is 250-275HP at the crank I know a car we can put it in that would terrorize the autox venues. And think torque... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
McMark |
Nov 7 2013, 10:00 PM
Post
#20
|
914 Freak! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,179 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None |
Not a bad idea... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
Thinking a Garrett T3/T4 with a specialized turbine and compressor for low end torque. But on the other hand I'm partial to the OE Porsche style KKK turbos (just because I have that nasty OE streak). But, yeah, all about the low torque. No point to 6000 rpm boost on a AX course. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 10:32 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |