 Nice 914 HP/Torque Graph |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| Cuda911 |
 May 31 2014, 10:48 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Members Posts: 1,489 Joined: 20-May 14 From: Oceanside (N. San Diego County), CA Member No.: 17,376 Region Association: Southern California  |
Found this graph today. Maybe it's a common one. If so, click on to the next thread. I found it interesting to study, so maybe some other 914 newbies will too.
. Attached image(s) 
|
   |
 
|
  |
Replies(1 - 7)
| JStroud |
Jun 1 2014, 08:08 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,463 Joined: 15-January 11 From: Galt, California Member No.: 12,594 Region Association: Northern California |
I'd like to see how a 2056 and 2270 would compare.
Cool graph....hadn't seen that one. |
|
|
|
| patssle |
Jun 1 2014, 08:48 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 981 Joined: 28-August 09 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 10,741 Region Association: None |
Why does the 1.7 put out more power than the 1.8? Why does the early 2.0 put out more power than the later 2.0?
|
|
|
|
| JStroud |
Jun 1 2014, 09:01 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,463 Joined: 15-January 11 From: Galt, California Member No.: 12,594 Region Association: Northern California |
QUOTE(patssle @ Jun 1 2014, 07:48 AM)  Why does the 1.7 put out more power than the 1.8? Why does the early 2.0 put out more power than the later 2.0? The later 2.0 had smog equipment and a restrictive exhuast. Not sure about the 1.7, maybe it was configured better, or did the 1.8 come out after smog equipment added too. |
|
|
|
| wes |
Jun 1 2014, 11:01 AM
Post
#5
|
|
wes Group: Members Posts: 1,588 Joined: 8-December 07 From: Ukiah Ca Member No.: 8,436 Region Association: Northern California 
|
I belive the 1.8 was to compensate for smog junk.
|
|
|
|
| r_towle |
Jun 1 2014, 05:59 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Custom Member Group: Members Posts: 24,574 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Taxachusetts Member No.: 124 Region Association: North East States
|
QUOTE(patssle @ Jun 1 2014, 10:48 AM) Why does the 1.7 put out more power than the 1.8? Because its a crappy low compression motor (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
|
| aircooledtechguy |
Jun 1 2014, 08:08 PM
Post
#7
|
|
The Aircooledtech Guy Group: Members Posts: 1,966 Joined: 8-November 08 From: Anacortes, WA Member No.: 9,730 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
QUOTE(r_towle @ Jun 1 2014, 04:59 PM) QUOTE(patssle @ Jun 1 2014, 10:48 AM) Why does the 1.7 put out more power than the 1.8? Because its a crappy low compression motor (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I can speak from experience when I say that I doubt my 1.8L has enough power to blow itself up. On the bright side, mine has over 350K on the clock. . . (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) |
|
|
|
| Cuda911 |
Jun 1 2014, 09:53 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,489 Joined: 20-May 14 From: Oceanside (N. San Diego County), CA Member No.: 17,376 Region Association: Southern California |
A related graph, here's acceleration of the various 914 permutations:
Attached image(s) 
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2024 - 06:37 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.