Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Advantages of H-Beam rods over stock in a 2.0L
lonewolfe
post Feb 20 2015, 02:46 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



What are the advantages of H-Beam rods over stock rods in a 2.0L motor? I know the H-Beams are lighter and stronger but in terms of performance what are the advantages of using the lighter rods?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
lonewolfe
post Feb 22 2015, 11:41 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some auto x but 95% for the street. I have a set of KS flat top 94's but may bump it up to 96's for a 2056. I'm thinking of using a Webcam 494 cam and around 9:0 to 1.0 compression. I'll be running a pair of Dellorto 40's & SSI heat exchangers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Feb 23 2015, 10:56 AM
Post #3


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 23 2015, 12:41 AM) *

This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some auto x but 95% for the street. I have a set of KS flat top 94's but may bump it up to 96's for a 2056. I'm thinking of using a Webcam 494 cam and around 9:0 to 1.0 compression. I'll be running a pair of Dellorto 40's & SSI heat exchangers.

That cam won't make power over 6000rpm, H-beams are a waste of money.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Feb 23 2015, 04:25 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Feb 23 2015, 08:56 AM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 23 2015, 12:41 AM) *

This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some auto x but 95% for the street. I have a set of KS flat top 94's but may bump it up to 96's for a 2056. I'm thinking of using a Webcam 494 cam and around 9:0 to 1.0 compression. I'll be running a pair of Dellorto 40's & SSI heat exchangers.

That cam won't make power over 6000rpm, H-beams are a waste of money.


Hi Mark! Thank you for your replies. From all your posts I've seen on here I can see you have a lot of experience and knowledge about Type 4 engines. I would like to squeeze the most performance I can out of this car while maintaining reliability and good street drive ability. I'd also like to keep heat in the car and I have a virtually new set of SSI 2.0 heat exchangers. I also have a pair of completely refurbished Dellorto 40 carbs. I have a couple pairs of 2.0 heads in great shape. What cam choice would you suggest that may be better? I live in the SF Bay Area so I'm basically at sea level. Any input will be appreciated. I have most of the parts needed and am not interested in a Raby cam kit for this motor. The Raby kits seem to be the Go To solution for many on here but I wish to have an alternate solution. I'm sure his stuff must be awesome but I want something different. Elgin or EMW cams are another option.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Feb 26 2015, 08:48 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 23 2015, 02:25 PM) *

QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Feb 23 2015, 08:56 AM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 23 2015, 12:41 AM) *

This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some auto x but 95% for the street. I have a set of KS flat top 94's but may bump it up to 96's for a 2056. I'm thinking of using a Webcam 494 cam and around 9:0 to 1.0 compression. I'll be running a pair of Dellorto 40's & SSI heat exchangers.

That cam won't make power over 6000rpm, H-beams are a waste of money.


Hi Mark! Thank you for your replies. From all your posts I've seen on here I can see you have a lot of experience and knowledge about Type 4 engines. I would like to squeeze the most performance I can out of this car while maintaining reliability and good street drive ability. I'd also like to keep heat in the car and I have a virtually new set of SSI 2.0 heat exchangers. I also have a pair of completely refurbished Dellorto 40 carbs. I have a couple pairs of 2.0 heads in great shape. What cam choice would you suggest that may be better? I live in the SF Bay Area so I'm basically at sea level. Any input will be appreciated. I have most of the parts needed and am not interested in a Raby cam kit for this motor. The Raby kits seem to be the Go To solution for many on here but I wish to have an alternate solution. I'm sure his stuff must be awesome but I want something different. Elgin or EMW cams are another option.



Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its' tracks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Feb 26 2015, 10:32 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 26 2015, 06:48 PM) *


Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its' tracks!



Sadly the discussion of modified Type IV's is going to be less and less it seems as those that are in the know move on to something else (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Feb 26 2015, 10:42 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Mueller @ Feb 26 2015, 08:32 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 26 2015, 06:48 PM) *


Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its' tracks!



Sadly the discussion of modified Type IV's is going to be less and less it seems as those that are in the know move on to something else (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)


Thanks for the reply Mueller! Sometimes it's like trying to find hens teeth to get information. Unless one is upgrading to a motor from a 911, Subie or some V8.

How's your new 914 coming along? I read on here that you finally found another one. I met you at a 914 breakfast get together a couple months ago out in Pleasant Hill. I think you were driving a Range Rover as I recall. I'm surprised Jake did not pipe in since his name was mentioned.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Feb 27 2015, 02:38 PM
Post #8


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 26 2015, 11:42 PM) *

QUOTE(Mueller @ Feb 26 2015, 08:32 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 26 2015, 06:48 PM) *


Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its' tracks!



Sadly the discussion of modified Type IV's is going to be less and less it seems as those that are in the know move on to something else (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)


Thanks for the reply Mueller! Sometimes it's like trying to find hens teeth to get information. Unless one is upgrading to a motor from a 911, Subie or some V8.

...

Yep agree, I've been building engines for over 25 years, I used to give lots advice, I got tired of being told I don't know shit from armchair engineers that read something on the internet.
I don't give much advice anymore.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/mellow.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Feb 28 2015, 02:32 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Feb 27 2015, 12:38 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 26 2015, 11:42 PM) *

QUOTE(Mueller @ Feb 26 2015, 08:32 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 26 2015, 06:48 PM) *


Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its' tracks!



Sadly the discussion of modified Type IV's is going to be less and less it seems as those that are in the know move on to something else (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)


Thanks for the reply Mueller! Sometimes it's like trying to find hens teeth to get information. Unless one is upgrading to a motor from a 911, Subie or some V8.

...

Yep agree, I've been building engines for over 25 years, I used to give lots advice, I got tired of being told I don't know shit from armchair engineers that read something on the internet.
I don't give much advice anymore.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/mellow.gif)


I totally understand Mark! There are a few opinionated people on here! That's true in any forum. Most are very cool and helpful!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Feb 28 2015, 11:35 AM
Post #10


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,982
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Feb 28 2015, 12:32 AM) *
I totally understand Mark! There are a few opinionated people on here! That's true in any forum. Most are very cool and helpful!


The worst ones are the guys who know enough to be dangerous. They have done a few things a bunch of times, and many things a few times, and know the theory, so they can sound really authoritative. But then you find out that their car hasn't run right in years... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)

Uh wait, where was I going with that??



BTW, I recall reading that the gear-driven flat-fan setup in the 935 sucked up something on the order of 30 HP at redline. Not a big deal if it helped your 700 HP motor live through a 24 hour race, but kind of a big deal to those of us with 100-200 HP motors.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
lonewolfe   Advantages of H-Beam rods over stock in a 2.0L   Feb 20 2015, 02:46 PM
GeorgeRud   Lighter rods would mean less rotating mass. Proba...   Feb 20 2015, 03:47 PM
Mark Henry   :agree: I wouldn't bother unless a race motor.   Feb 20 2015, 04:05 PM
lonewolfe   Thank you two for your responses! I am surpris...   Feb 22 2015, 03:59 PM
ldsgeek   You need to keep in mind what kind of motors Jake ...   Feb 22 2015, 05:28 PM
r_towle   Street motor, or even slightly hopped up, I would ...   Feb 22 2015, 05:33 PM
brant   They are better by being lighter and stronger. De...   Feb 22 2015, 05:35 PM
lonewolfe   This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some aut...   Feb 22 2015, 11:41 PM
Mark Henry   This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some au...   Feb 23 2015, 10:56 AM
lonewolfe   This is primarily for a street car. Maybe some a...   Feb 23 2015, 04:25 PM
lonewolfe   [quote name='Mark Henry' post='2150551' date='Feb...   Feb 26 2015, 08:48 PM
Mueller   Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its...   Feb 26 2015, 10:32 PM
lonewolfe   Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its...   Feb 26 2015, 10:42 PM
Mark Henry   [quote name='Mueller' post='2152142' date='Feb 26...   Feb 27 2015, 02:38 PM
lonewolfe   [quote name='Mueller' post='2152142' date='Feb 2...   Feb 28 2015, 02:32 AM
Dave_Darling   I totally understand Mark! There are a few opi...   Feb 28 2015, 11:35 AM
Jake Raby   Nothing? I think this thread is dead in its...   Mar 1 2015, 02:14 PM
Olympic 1.7   Used the H-beam rods in mine, 2056 with 96mm KB fl...   Feb 23 2015, 08:59 AM
76racer   Have you priced H beam rods recently? by the time ...   Feb 27 2015, 12:08 PM
lonewolfe   Have you priced H beam rods recently? by the time...   Feb 27 2015, 02:14 PM
Woody   Have you priced H beam rods recently? by the tim...   Feb 27 2015, 03:40 PM
lonewolfe   [quote name='lonewolfe' post='2152397' date='Feb ...   Feb 27 2015, 03:49 PM
lonewolfe   [quote name='lonewolfe' post='2152397' date='Feb ...   Feb 28 2015, 03:42 AM
Racer Chris   ... I believe that's the cam RacerChris uses ...   Feb 27 2015, 06:58 PM
Mueller   ... I believe that's the cam RacerChris uses...   Feb 27 2015, 07:57 PM
Racer Chris   ... Better rods for the 1.8 are available? What a...   Feb 28 2015, 05:58 PM
Al Meredith   When you go to a stroked crank you must go to a CN...   Feb 27 2015, 12:54 PM
Woody   The rods are 5.325. Cam is an 86b/86c on 105 degre...   Feb 27 2015, 04:14 PM
lonewolfe   The rods are 5.325. Cam is an 86b/86c on 105 degr...   Feb 27 2015, 04:33 PM
Mark Henry   The rods are 5.325. Cam is an 86b/86c on 105 deg...   Feb 27 2015, 04:39 PM
Woody   I have never used them before and haven't hear...   Feb 27 2015, 04:44 PM
lonewolfe   I have never used them before and haven't hea...   Feb 27 2015, 05:13 PM
Woody   It's an autocross car but will see some track ...   Feb 27 2015, 06:31 PM
Woody   I'm going with an upright fan conversion from ...   Feb 28 2015, 07:49 AM
Mark Henry   The FAT kit is no worse than any other 911 fan kit...   Feb 28 2015, 09:10 AM
Mueller   I'm waiting for the 911/908 based horizontal f...   Feb 28 2015, 09:21 AM
Mark Henry   I'm waiting for the 911/908 based horizontal ...   Feb 28 2015, 01:21 PM
Racer Chris   ... Not the same as the Porsche solution, but Ch...   Feb 28 2015, 06:15 PM
lonewolfe   [quote name='Mark Henry' post='2152755' date='Feb...   Mar 1 2015, 03:38 PM
Jake Raby   Woody, I love 5.325" rods with an 80 crank, i...   Mar 1 2015, 04:13 PM
Woody   Woody, I love 5.325" rods with an 80 crank, ...   Mar 1 2015, 08:19 PM
Jake Raby   The magic number for a reduced BC on a T4 cam with...   Mar 1 2015, 11:26 PM
Woody   I went with the 3/8" rod bolts. Kicking mysel...   Mar 2 2015, 07:11 AM
Jake Raby   The issue is all the material removal makes for a ...   Mar 2 2015, 08:10 AM
Woody   That's certainly what it's look like. I am...   Mar 2 2015, 08:29 AM
Jake Raby   I think I would. I've ripped the threads out o...   Mar 2 2015, 09:45 AM
Woody   it looks like there's plenty of thread engagem...   Mar 2 2015, 10:29 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2024 - 08:30 AM