Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 914 Steel front crossmember vs 911 Aluminum (Weight)
Mr. Olympic Blue 2 You
post Mar 30 2015, 12:53 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 134
Joined: 7-September 10
From: Puyallup, WA
Member No.: 12,150
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I know the 914 steel front cross member really doesn't weigh that much but wondered if the ounce counters have weighed it compared to an aluminum 911 cross member and what the savings was?

I believe the aluminum was stronger and cheaper to produce (not to necessarily save weight) by Porsche..

Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Mar 30 2015, 01:44 PM
Post #2


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,254
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



The aluminum part won't fit the protective steel cover so I decided not to use it. I think it saves about a pound and half.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
whatabout1
post Mar 30 2015, 02:05 PM
Post #3


Toys in Red
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 6-March 06
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 5,676
Region Association: None



Couple of pounds IIRC

There was a discussion about removing weight that low in the car raises your center of gravity.

I put 1 in anyways. With the bhp that I have every pound lost will help (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mr. Olympic Blue 2 You
post Mar 30 2015, 02:43 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 134
Joined: 7-September 10
From: Puyallup, WA
Member No.: 12,150
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Thanks for the info guys..I hadn't taken the cover fitment into account so I think I'll put this to rest for the 2lb savings (which is about what I figured)

Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jetsetsurfshop
post Mar 30 2015, 02:46 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 7-April 11
From: Marco Island Florida
Member No.: 12,907
Region Association: South East States



I had one of each and decided to leave the steel one in my car. I liked that the weight was as low as it could be and I didn't need to fab a new cover either.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Mar 30 2015, 05:08 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



I was considering the Al cross member also and got to thinking that Aluminum isn't as stiff as steel. The cross member is the part that actually reacts the forces from the front torsion bars. The torsion bars put the cross member in bending and the Aluminum being more flexible would transmit more of the loading to the chassis. In noticed some cracks starting to form around the area where the cross member mounts............ anyway I ended up welding a flat piece of steel to the bottom of the steel cross member to make it even stiffer. FWIW
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Mar 30 2015, 06:04 PM
Post #7


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,612
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



I've seen them flex. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon8.gif)

Went back to a stock steel one after that. Even if it's a few ounces heavier, that weight is about as low in the car as you can get.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john914somers
post Mar 30 2015, 11:08 PM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 24-January 12
From: sacramento
Member No.: 14,051
Region Association: Northern California



I wanted to put an aluminum one in my car but the wise old Tangerine educated me. Thanks Chris!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
campbellcj
post Mar 31 2015, 09:53 AM
Post #9


I can't Re Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,542
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Agoura, CA
Member No.: 21
Region Association: Southern California



When I converted my car around 2003 I had the option of aluminum vs. steel and was advised by several "gurus" to stick with the steel.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Mar 31 2015, 06:20 PM
Post #10


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,618
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Despite all of the talk. I've run aluminum in w2w race cars since the early 90's with no problems.

I made an aluminum pan in 05 that has held up even with abuse. Pictures in my thread

1826lbs in metal body panels required it.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd May 2024 - 09:01 AM