Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Oil analysis on a 911 race engine, elevated lead/copper?
stownsen914
post May 3 2015, 10:58 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



Hi all,

I posted this question on the Pelican board, and would like to get opinions here as well.

I'd like to get your input on the oil analysis I just had done on a 911 race engine from my 914/6. It shows elevated lead and copper, which I'm guessing could mean bearing wear. Does this mean the engine is just moving toward rebuild time, or does it mean "don't drive it anymore, rebuild now"?

A few details:
- I do use leaded gas, which I understand can explain the high lead level in the oil
- The engine is a short stroke 2.7 (93 x 66), is revved to 7500 with no overrevs, and has about 55 track hours on it.

The summary mentions "cautionary" about the lead but doesn't use as strong language about the copper. It also says that lead seems may be explainable from the leaded gas. I was expecting a little more time before a rebuild, but maybe time's up?

In addition to the oil analysis report, I'm also including some pics of the Canton oil filter element that I run in place of the stock oil cooler on the engine. I have not changed or inspected this filter in a long time, as I use an coarser screen element nspection filter in the scavenge side of the oil system (definitely a mistake to not have checked the filter on the engine more often). Note a significant amount of metal bits, with some of them being magnetic (last blurry pic shows a magnet I trolled around on the filter element). Could this be acceptable given the extended period of time this filter was in service?

Thanks in advance for your opinions!

Scott


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 03:39 AM