Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Alignment issues, bent trailing arm?
Alapone
post Jul 22 2015, 02:54 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 4-April 13
From: Nj
Member No.: 15,734
Region Association: None



I am having trouble getting my car aligned properly. The tech was saying the rear left was set to +1.00 camber. This was noticeable when crouching behind the car. The front alignment was substantially toe-in in order to counteract this.

Rewind 18 months: The car was slid into a curb which resulted in a bent wheel and some damage to the inside trailing arm hook up point (don't have the real term for this but I mean the ear where the inside bolt of the trailing arm hooks to the car. This was all supposed to have been fixed and straight.

Last week: Having recently finished a 5 lug conversion which retained the same rear trailing arms I went to go have an alignment done when they told me someone non specifically "something in the rear is bent".

How do I go about checking to see what is wrong? I assume autocross guys have good experience with this type of thing. Do trailing arms bend? Is the ear/hook up point the place to start? I'm sure I can find a used straight trailing arm for $100 or so here on the world but what am I up against if it is damage to the ear/hook up?

Any advice is appreciated
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jul 22 2015, 03:07 PM
Post #2


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,651
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



Yes, they do bend and are designed to do just that
It's easier to replace a bent trailing arm than to fix a broken or ripped apart chassis.

I recall seeing a technical drawing many years ago that had all the trailing arm measurements and i even recall a jig made to check trailing arms for straightness.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdwardBlume
post Jul 22 2015, 03:31 PM
Post #3


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,338
Joined: 2-January 03
From: SLO
Member No.: 81
Region Association: Central California



Andy is correct. The trailing arm on Dads car is bent from a lousy flat tow.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bdstone914
post Jul 22 2015, 09:52 PM
Post #4


bdstone914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,523
Joined: 8-November 03
From: Riverside CA
Member No.: 1,319



Probably a bent arm. Early 70-72 have a different flex brake line bracket than the 73-76. I have them and would sell one for $50 plus shipping. Bare arm no spindle bearing or hub.
Can sell one but you may find one closer to save shipping. they weight about 25 pounds.
Did you replace the bushings when you did the 5 lug? I suppose that distorted bushing could cause too much negative camber.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgp4591
post Jul 22 2015, 10:20 PM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,375
Joined: 1-August 12
From: Salt Lake City Ut
Member No.: 14,748
Region Association: Intermountain Region



Small hijack here- so does the fact that they're meant to do that (bend vs. more damage) mean that it's not a good idea to reinforce them even if you're running lots more power and weight? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jul 23 2015, 01:33 AM
Post #6


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,651
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(mgp4591 @ Jul 22 2015, 09:20 PM) *
Small hijack here- so does the fact that they're meant to do that (bend vs. more damage) mean that it's not a good idea to reinforce them even if you're running lots more power and weight? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)

Neither power nor weight are really the issue, especially not for a street car.

Reinforced trailing arms make sense for a track car running large sticky slicks ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alapone
post Jul 23 2015, 05:57 AM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 4-April 13
From: Nj
Member No.: 15,734
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jul 23 2015, 03:33 AM) *

QUOTE(mgp4591 @ Jul 22 2015, 09:20 PM) *
Small hijack here- so does the fact that they're meant to do that (bend vs. more damage) mean that it's not a good idea to reinforce them even if you're running lots more power and weight? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)

Neither power nor weight are really the issue, especially not for a street car.

Reinforced trailing arms make sense for a track car running large sticky slicks ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)


thanks guys. bdstone, yes we did replace bushings at the time of the conversion because they had worn unevenly. The right rear was completely worn out while the right left (where I have the issue) was not as bad.

This leads me to believe the problem with this car may have existed before I owned, or before the incident sliding it into the curb. Though the curb shot I gave it and this issue with the camber are too coincidental to not be related I think. How do I go about measuring the trailing arm to see if it is good? Are all trailing arms the same 70-76?

To be clear the tech at the alignment shop told me I have significant (1.00) positive camber on the rear left. (Top of the wheel is farther outboard than the bottom)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Jul 23 2015, 06:18 AM
Post #8


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,559
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



Hey Andrew
We can remove your trailing arm and measure it against others I have.
It should be possible even without a jig.
This will determine where the issue is.
Rory
PS yes, new bushings installed
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alapone
post Jul 23 2015, 07:03 AM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 4-April 13
From: Nj
Member No.: 15,734
Region Association: None



QUOTE(rgalla9146 @ Jul 23 2015, 08:18 AM) *

Hey Andrew
We can remove your trailing arm and measure it against others I have.
It should be possible even without a jig.
This will determine where the issue is.
Rory
PS yes, new bushings installed

haha sry I didn't want to bother you on vacation! talk soon
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jul 23 2015, 04:32 PM
Post #10


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,990
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The Haynes manual has a photo of measuring the trailing arm and a spec for measurement. As with most of their photos (and words!) it came straight out of the factory manual.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Jul 23 2015, 04:54 PM
Post #11


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,927
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



There is a 1.5 degree negative camber built into the trailing arms.
That means if you have the pivot shaft perfectly level and the axle at the exact same height as the pivot shaft, the hub will have a negative camber of 1.5 degrees.
Any other results means the trailing arm is bent.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Jul 24 2015, 05:30 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,559
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



great information, better than just a comparison
thanks Chris
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Alapone
post Jul 24 2015, 07:44 AM
Post #13


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 4-April 13
From: Nj
Member No.: 15,734
Region Association: None



QUOTE(rgalla9146 @ Jul 24 2015, 07:30 AM) *

great information, better than just a comparison
thanks Chris

thanks guys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 06:10 AM