Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Anyone understand IR manifolds, And how they affect carb sizing ?
got914?
post Jul 29 2015, 01:20 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 8-October 14
From: Niagara
Member No.: 17,993
Region Association: None



Im looking at putting carburetors on a motor and trying to figure out how to select the carb size ?

Is it all based on head flow or is that only part of it ?
There isnt much on the internet other than proven engine combos.

Now a 250 Chevy straight 6 can run triple webers that flow 250 cfm per choke for a total of 1500 CFM, this is where i know IR manifolds work with higher CFM because obviously a single 1500 carb on a common plenum manifold would be way over carb'd.

Now its a 3.3 Subaru motor H6 boxer engine. 202 CI
HEad flow data found here

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=189677

States it maxs out at about 165 cfm SO I would assume I can use that as part of the calculation. Obviously you cant go higher than that or your over carbing.

What are your thoughts ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jul 29 2015, 01:46 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



As copied from Jenvey:

[b]What is the best throttle body diameter ?

Factors influencing size are; Power output, RPM, cylinder head design, cylinder capacity, position of the throttle body in the inlet tract and position of the injector.

Choice of bore size is a balanced compromise resulting from the following;
1) A larger bore leads to lower flow resistance, but obeying the laws of diminishing returns.
2) A smaller bore leads to better throttle control and response (never underestimate) and improved fuel mixing.
3) The system should be considered in total - from (at least) trumpet flange to cylinder and proportioned accordingly.

Basic references for BHP per cylinder, assuming ca 120mm from butterfly to valve head and a max of 9,000 rpm are;
Up to 30 BHP - 30mm, up to 33 - 32mm, up to 39 - 35mm, up to 46 - 38mm, up to 51 - 40mm, up to 56 - 42mm
Up to 65 - 45mm, up to 74 - 48mm, up to 80 - 50mm, up to 87 - 52mm, up to 93 - 54mm.
These power figures may be increased by up to 10% in a purpose designed and well proportioned system.
As butterfly to valve distance increases, butterfly size will need to increase in proportion to system taper and vice versa.
Lower revving engines and those with injectors placed before the butterfly will generally accept a larger body.[/b]


Please don't say you are not doing a single carb on flat motor!

google carb or itb calculator for a start.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jul 29 2015, 03:12 PM
Post #3


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



Might help if you state what engine you have in mind. The 3.3 subi?

For the price of a decent carb set (and ignition) on a 6cyl I'd just look at doing a megasquirt with modified bike Tb's.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
got914?
post Jul 29 2015, 03:31 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 8-October 14
From: Niagara
Member No.: 17,993
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Jul 29 2015, 05:12 PM) *

Might help if you state what engine you have in mind. The 3.3 subi?

For the price of a decent carb set (and ignition) on a 6cyl I'd just look at doing a megasquirt with modified bike Tb's.


Yes 3.3 Subi.
ID be trying for 6 one per cylinder. Or maybe 4 (prefer one per cylinder)
Yes I realize a megasquirt could be more efficient , bla, bla bla.
Carbs would be much more unique and im not building this car for efficiency, lol.

AS for what carb, well thats gonna depend on what sizing i should use.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jul 29 2015, 03:48 PM
Post #5


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



Three 40mm IDF webers on a custom mild steel tube manifold.
But a 4 barrel single would also likely work.

As for research...unless someone has done it you are on your own.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DBCooper
post Jul 30 2015, 07:55 AM
Post #6


14's in the 13's with ATTITUDE
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,079
Joined: 25-August 04
From: Dazed and Confused
Member No.: 2,618
Region Association: Northern California




This is a 2.2 with Dellorto 36's:

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i53.photobucket.com-2618-1438264509.1.jpg)

It might be a little under-carbed (it's also plumbed for NO2) but there weren't any problems. The Dellorto's flow about the same as Weber 40IDF's, so that should be about the right ballpark. MegaJolt for ignition.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
got914?
post Jul 30 2015, 03:55 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 8-October 14
From: Niagara
Member No.: 17,993
Region Association: None



QUOTE(DBCooper @ Jul 30 2015, 09:55 AM) *

This is a 2.2 with Dellorto 36's:

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i53.photobucket.com-2618-1438264509.1.jpg)

It might be a little under-carbed (it's also plumbed for NO2) but there weren't any problems. The Dellorto's flow about the same as Weber 40IDF's, so that should be about the right ballpark. MegaJolt for ignition.



YAh they are about 205 - 210 CFM per choke so like 850 cfm combined which seems like a lot but on IR manifolds carbs can be so much bigger and run great.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Jul 30 2015, 09:10 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,545
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



Call PMO The Porsche carb specialists
They have reproduced the Weber triple throats with many improvements....
and in a few different sizes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
a914622
post Jul 31 2015, 07:51 AM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 316
Joined: 12-August 10
From: northwest
Member No.: 12,048
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



On the 3.3 the head casting is the biggest restriction. Even a mild port job can increase your flow. There is a ton of room. I would think a set of triple webers made for a 3.2 porsche should be close. Remember a 4 valve head should out flow a 2 valve head.

But realy I would think a cool looking snow machine throttle body and an injection system would give you the cool look and modern control. Or macanical injection!! Wouldn't that be a mess to set up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 11:06 PM