Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Anyone understand IR manifolds, And how they affect carb sizing ?
got914?
post Jul 29 2015, 01:20 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 8-October 14
From: Niagara
Member No.: 17,993
Region Association: None



Im looking at putting carburetors on a motor and trying to figure out how to select the carb size ?

Is it all based on head flow or is that only part of it ?
There isnt much on the internet other than proven engine combos.

Now a 250 Chevy straight 6 can run triple webers that flow 250 cfm per choke for a total of 1500 CFM, this is where i know IR manifolds work with higher CFM because obviously a single 1500 carb on a common plenum manifold would be way over carb'd.

Now its a 3.3 Subaru motor H6 boxer engine. 202 CI
HEad flow data found here

http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=189677

States it maxs out at about 165 cfm SO I would assume I can use that as part of the calculation. Obviously you cant go higher than that or your over carbing.

What are your thoughts ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Mueller
post Jul 29 2015, 01:46 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



As copied from Jenvey:

[b]What is the best throttle body diameter ?

Factors influencing size are; Power output, RPM, cylinder head design, cylinder capacity, position of the throttle body in the inlet tract and position of the injector.

Choice of bore size is a balanced compromise resulting from the following;
1) A larger bore leads to lower flow resistance, but obeying the laws of diminishing returns.
2) A smaller bore leads to better throttle control and response (never underestimate) and improved fuel mixing.
3) The system should be considered in total - from (at least) trumpet flange to cylinder and proportioned accordingly.

Basic references for BHP per cylinder, assuming ca 120mm from butterfly to valve head and a max of 9,000 rpm are;
Up to 30 BHP - 30mm, up to 33 - 32mm, up to 39 - 35mm, up to 46 - 38mm, up to 51 - 40mm, up to 56 - 42mm
Up to 65 - 45mm, up to 74 - 48mm, up to 80 - 50mm, up to 87 - 52mm, up to 93 - 54mm.
These power figures may be increased by up to 10% in a purpose designed and well proportioned system.
As butterfly to valve distance increases, butterfly size will need to increase in proportion to system taper and vice versa.
Lower revving engines and those with injectors placed before the butterfly will generally accept a larger body.[/b]


Please don't say you are not doing a single carb on flat motor!

google carb or itb calculator for a start.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2024 - 03:43 PM