Was ITB size for 2270 motor Now Single plenum 2270 |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Was ITB size for 2270 motor Now Single plenum 2270 |
cgnj |
Mar 15 2016, 03:41 PM
Post
#1
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 623 Joined: 6-March 03 From: Medford, NJ Member No.: 403 Region Association: None |
I have been running 45 dells on 2270 with 34mm vents. Not sure if it was the cam choice (163/86b0, but it was much easier to drive with than with the 38/39 vents.
I was going to gut my spare dells for this project, but I think they are worth more in the box. So, for street 2270 what size motorcycle from wich bike tb should I be looking at for a first build? Thanks in advance, Carlos |
aircooledtechguy |
Mar 16 2016, 03:43 PM
Post
#2
|
The Aircooledtech Guy Group: Members Posts: 1,966 Joined: 8-November 08 From: Anacortes, WA Member No.: 9,730 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
A plenum based system is easier to tune and will net you more hp & torque down low on the RPM range. Plus they are just easier to set-up and tune to some extent. A 75mm TB on a factory 2.0L plenum is absolutely HUGE and I would expect tip-in tuning issues going that large. I would look into a Jeep straight-6 TB since they are around 60mm (up from the factory 50mm for the 2.0L) and have an integrated IAC valve.
Then get a pair of these ends and make your own runners with mandrel bent tubing. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/images.thesamba.com-9730-1458164598.1.jpg) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/images.thesamba.com-9730-1458164598.2.jpg) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/images.thesamba.com-9730-1458164598.3.jpg) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/images.thesamba.com-9730-1458164598.4.jpg) Use 1.625" tubing and you've got one hell of an intake system. |
Mark Henry |
Mar 16 2016, 09:40 PM
Post
#3
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
A plenum based system is easier to tune and will net you more hp & torque down low on the RPM range. Plus they are just easier to set-up and tune to some extent. A 75mm TB on a factory 2.0L plenum is absolutely HUGE and I would expect tip-in tuning issues going that large. I would look into a Jeep straight-6 TB since they are around 60mm (up from the factory 50mm for the 2.0L) and have an integrated IAC valve. Then get a pair of these ends and make your own runners with mandrel bent tubing. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/images.thesamba.com-9730-1458164598.1.jpg) Use 1.625" tubing and you've got one hell of an intake system. You right 75mm is too big my bad. It's been a few years since I looked into it last, so I was working from memory. How I got the figure is Ford performance guys are removing stock TB's and replacing them with aftermarket 75mm TB's, Thus stock mustang TB's can be had for cheap. The stock Mustang TB I have in front of me and pictured below is 60mm. If you used a pair of those ends you could do a DIY intake like Nate said. Here are a couple of how to's, first one is a subi so it's actually close to what you would need. http://www.sdsefi.com/air12.html http://www.sdsefi.com/techinta.htm Attached image(s) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2024 - 01:12 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |