Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Decision time, Fuel injection or carb(s)
srreality
post Apr 29 2016, 01:26 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 73
Joined: 14-July 15
From: Colorado
Member No.: 18,957
Region Association: None



I've reassembled most of the project car I bought last fall........1973 914-4 1.7 liter. I'm in the process of restoring/rebuilding the suspension and brakes. The next big thing on the list is engine rebuild. I can't do the work myself, but have a good engine builder locally. Question is, rebuild the fuel injection (car sat in a "sealed" storage container for 8 years) or convert to Weber(s). If I'm going to convert to carbs, the engine rebuild needs to include a different cam, so good time to decide. This car will be a very nice "driver" not a show car or track car, so complete originality is not necessary. Functionality and driveability are. The thin air here in Colorado begs for more HP, but the budget doesn't allow for "wild" things. What say Forum? Spend $ on fuel injection rebuild or convert to carbs?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914Sixer
post Apr 29 2016, 01:30 PM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,862
Joined: 17-January 05
From: San Angelo Texas
Member No.: 3,457
Region Association: Southwest Region



It came with fuel injection for a reason.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdwardBlume
post Apr 29 2016, 01:32 PM
Post #3


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,338
Joined: 2-January 03
From: SLO
Member No.: 81
Region Association: Central California



Do what you want, but I chose to go with a 2056 with a LN cam using a stock FI. I dig dual carbs, but chose the FI in the end.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ThePaintedMan
post Apr 29 2016, 01:35 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,885
Joined: 6-September 11
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Member No.: 13,527
Region Association: South East States



I love working on carbs, but I would prefer a fuel injected car hands down, every day.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ThinAir
post Apr 29 2016, 01:38 PM
Post #5


Best friends
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,531
Joined: 4-February 03
From: Flagstaff, AZ
Member No.: 231
Region Association: Southwest Region



My recommendation is to keep the FI. It is much more adaptable for varying conditions and needs almost no "tuning" like you'll experience with carbs. Dual carbs need syncing, which requires specialized equipment. I find the FI performance better as well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Apr 29 2016, 01:57 PM
Post #6


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,300
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



If you have all the injection parts, why wouldn't you? You said driveability. That answers the question for me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jor
post Apr 29 2016, 02:05 PM
Post #7


Just happy to be here.
**

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 28-July 14
From: LA
Member No.: 17,693
Region Association: Southern California



I have carbs on my car because a prior own lost the FI. I appreciate the noise and I like the power. But if I had the FI, I'd be using the FI. In your position, I would stick with the FI. The carbs reduce your economy and give you less flexibility when driving between altitudes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
saigon71
post Apr 29 2016, 02:34 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,993
Joined: 1-June 09
From: Dillsburg, PA
Member No.: 10,428
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Once the kinks are worked out on the factory FI, it really is an excellent system for both drivability and performance.

+1 on sticking with FI. I'm a big fan of D-Jet.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Apr 29 2016, 02:37 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



Where in Colorado are you located?

I have a car with Carbs and two complete FI systems (one 1.8L and one 2.0L) that I don't need.

QUOTE(914Sixer @ Apr 29 2016, 01:30 PM) *

It came with fuel injection for a reason.


And the 914 that won its class in Le Mans had carbs for a reason too.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/cheer.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
boxsterfan
post Apr 29 2016, 02:43 PM
Post #10


914's are kewl
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,776
Joined: 6-June 03
From: San Ramon, CA
Member No.: 791
Region Association: Northern California



Go with FI. Try to find original or look for someone selling a used Megaquirt/Microsuirt setup.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mark04usa
post Apr 29 2016, 02:48 PM
Post #11


'70 1.7 Tangerine
**

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 14-September 09
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 10,805
Region Association: Southwest Region



No to Carbs..BTDT, with FI, you'll have a much better car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
poorsche914
post Apr 29 2016, 02:52 PM
Post #12


T4 Supercharged
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,087
Joined: 28-May 09
From: Smoky Mountains
Member No.: 10,419
Region Association: South East States



Recently installed a 2056 built for carbs (about a 1000 miles so far)... I miss the FI (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ndfrigi
post Apr 29 2016, 03:26 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,926
Joined: 21-August 11
From: Orange County
Member No.: 13,474
Region Association: Southern California



F.I.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
somd914
post Apr 29 2016, 03:46 PM
Post #14


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,171
Joined: 21-February 11
From: Southern Maryland
Member No.: 12,741
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I've had better luck with carbs than my D-Jet, but I'd love to have a modern FI system - parts availability and maintaining a proper configuration for a specific year is becoming difficult. Ultimately it is your car, your choice - don't let us make the choice, you have to live with it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cairo94507
post Apr 29 2016, 04:11 PM
Post #15


Michael
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,699
Joined: 1-November 08
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 9,712
Region Association: Northern California



Aside from all of the above, and really a 2056 is the way I would go too with a mild cam and the stock FI, the next best reason is to keep your wife/girlfriend/ significant other, from walking into the house and constantly complaining about the gas smell.

Carbs smell and they smell when you are driving too. I could always smell the gas on my 2nd Six when it had the stock 2.0 and Webers. My wife would come in after I came home and freak out thinking the water heater was going to blow up the house due to the gas fumes in the garage.

I also grew tried of balancing the Webers on a regular basis. I went with a 3.2 with Motronic in my '71 Six for just those reasons. OH, yeah, the extra HP might have been a small factor..... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/w00t.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BeatNavy
post Apr 29 2016, 04:23 PM
Post #16


Certified Professional Scapegoat
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,924
Joined: 26-February 14
From: Easton, MD
Member No.: 17,042
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I'm with Bob (Saigon71) - I like D-Jet, but if you're starting to put it together from scratch it can take a fair amount of work to get it right. I would like to experiment with Megasquirt on a build in the not too distant future. So yeah, I'm in the FI camp, but I like learning and tinkering with stuff.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Justinp71
post Apr 29 2016, 04:30 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,582
Joined: 11-October 04
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 2,922
Region Association: None



I'm starting to think part of the carb smell is the engine breather. Typically the engine breather is re-cycled in FI , but in a carbed car its dumped to atmopshere. I currently have my breather dump into a can in the rear trunk and have a lean/normal a/f at idle and the smell isn't that bad with my carbs. But don't put anything in the trunk (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ThinAir
post Apr 29 2016, 04:37 PM
Post #18


Best friends
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,531
Joined: 4-February 03
From: Flagstaff, AZ
Member No.: 231
Region Association: Southwest Region



If I was going to change from factory FI it would be to go to a MegaSquirt type of setup. My reasons would be because of concerns over original FI parts becoming unavailable and because the MegaSquirt type of system is so tunable.

The D-Jet documentation by Brad Anders is absolutely indispensible (http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/) for optimizing and maintaining D-Jet systems. I have found my D-Jet to be very reliable and not as tough to get tuned as some have made it sound. One thing for sure - I could not have done it without Brad's wonderful resource.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
boxsterfan
post Apr 29 2016, 04:40 PM
Post #19


914's are kewl
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,776
Joined: 6-June 03
From: San Ramon, CA
Member No.: 791
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(ThinAir @ Apr 29 2016, 03:37 PM) *

The D-Jet documentation by Brad Anders is absolutely indispensible (http://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/) for optimizing and maintaining D-Jet systems. I have found my D-Jet to be very reliable and not as tough to get tuned as some have made it sound. One thing for sure - I could not have done it without Brad's wonderful resource.



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) + 1,000,000
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BK911
post Apr 29 2016, 06:57 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 672
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Rocky Top, TN
Member No.: 1,674
Region Association: None



You can install a fi cam and run carbs.
It will run fine.
I went carbs because I was tired of trouble shooting the fi.
Installed carbs and never looked back.
But that was before the prices for original cars started taking off.
Still love my carbs and have no plans of converting back.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th April 2024 - 11:15 PM