Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> L-Jet Idle on new build with 9550
andreic
post May 21 2016, 09:23 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 21-December 15
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 19,479
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Hello,

I am just finishing up a new engine build for a 1975 914 1.8L.

The engine is mostly stock, except for the fact that I am using 96mm cylinders (1911cc total) and a Raby 9550 cam. Using the stock L-Jet fuel injection.

I managed to get the engine started, broken in (25 minutes at 2500 RPM), all is well. I also adjusted the timing as per standard instructions (showing the L-Jet mark on the fan at 800 RPM with vacuum lines removed and plugged). The engine is accelerating smoothly and seems to have good power throughout the whole RPM curve (without a load, though, I am testing it outside the car).

The only thing not working is the fact that it will die (stall) at idle. Does not matter if it is hot or cold. I tried the idle adjustment screw on the throttle body, and while I can perhaps get the idle up to 500 RPM with the screw all the way out, I can't get it to 900. And at 500 RPM it is very shaky.

Any suggestions as to what I can do? I knew that using the 9550 cam with the L-Jet was going to give me trouble, but I hope there is some way to fix this. Tomorrow I want to check if there are any vacuum leaks, but I suspect there are none, I was quite careful with all the vacuum lines. If the problem is the cam, can the throttle be perhaps modified to let in more air at idle?

Thanks,
Andrei.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Valy
post May 21 2016, 10:01 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,671
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 11,573
Region Association: Northern California



A vacuum leak will probably get your idle higher.
Opening the idle screw actually creates an air bypass for the AFM that is the same as a vacuum leak. Try inducing a bit of a vacuum leak and see if it helps. If yes, you can either install a manual valve to regulate a vacuum leak or drill a small hole in the throttle butterfly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post May 21 2016, 10:08 PM
Post #3


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



It's an interesting system because vacuum leaks make ljet idle much lower and die as you are experiencing. If you introduced a vacuum leak to djet it would idle higher, but not ljet.

So, look for leaks, valves adjusted again after break in.
Oil filler cap gasket and oring in place
Valve cover gaskets done right
All hoses tight
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
timothy_nd28
post May 21 2016, 10:17 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,299
Joined: 25-September 07
From: IN
Member No.: 8,154
Region Association: Upper MidWest



500 RPM is pretty low, how are you observing this? The dash tachometer only reads down to 750 rpm.
If you truly are idling, trying to idle at 500 rpm, there is a good chance the fuel pump is dropping out. The airflow meter engages the dual relay by deflection of the flap within the air flow meter. At 500 rpm, the flap isn't deflected enough to keep the fuel pump running. This is probably why your engine wants to die at the low idle speeds.

Toward the low idle condition, I can think of two possible scenarios. It's possible that the air bleed passages in the throttle body are plugged, causing no change in rpms when turning the idle screw.
Or
Your timing is too retarded (is this word correct?). Advancing the dizzy will increase your idle. There is more than one mark on the fan, which one did you use?

My money is on a timing issue
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post May 21 2016, 10:40 PM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,197
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(timothy_nd28 @ May 21 2016, 09:17 PM) *

500 RPM is pretty low, how are you observing this? The dash tachometer only reads down to 750 rpm.
If you truly are idling, trying to idle at 500 rpm, there is a good chance the fuel pump is dropping out. The airflow meter engages the dual relay by deflection of the flap within the air flow meter. At 500 rpm, the flap isn't deflected enough to keep the fuel pump running. This is probably why your engine wants to die at the low idle speeds.

Toward the low idle condition, I can think of two possible scenarios. It's possible that the air bleed passages in the throttle body are plugged, causing no change in rpms when turning the idle screw.
Or
Your timing is too retarded (is this word correct?). Advancing the dizzy will increase your idle. There is more than one mark on the fan, which one did you use?

My money is on a timing issue



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

But check for leaks first.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post May 21 2016, 10:53 PM
Post #6


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



there is a idle air adjustment at the airvalve also thats adjusts the rich/lean at idle
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post May 21 2016, 11:06 PM
Post #7


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



oops
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pilothyer
post May 22 2016, 12:24 AM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 838
Joined: 21-May 08
From: N. Alabama
Member No.: 9,080
Region Association: South East States



andreic.......................................Here is an old thread you may find helpful, our Dearly Departed Cap'n Krusty chimes in a good bit on this one:

http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=95771
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porschetub
post May 22 2016, 02:10 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,697
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



Yep timing is retarded.......
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andreic
post May 22 2016, 07:10 AM
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 21-December 15
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 19,479
Region Association: Upper MidWest



OK, trying to understand all the responses above. From what I have read, having a leak in the L-Jet makes the idle slower not faster. This is what the Cap'n seemed to be saying in the older thread, which I had read. So I am now looking for vacuum leaks. What I read I should try to do is spray carb cleaner at the manifold body (from the outside), and see if that changes the idle -- that would be an indication of leaks.

There are no air bleed passages at the idle adjustment screw as far as I can tell, it is just a big fat screw which adjusts how much air goes past the butterfly valve when it is closed.

I will do a valve adjustment today, and re-check the timing.

Was the comment about the airvalve referring to the AAR (auxiliary air regulator)? I did not see any adjustments on it...

Finally, the valve covers have been cleaned during the rebuild, and new gaskets installed. I did not put any kind of sealant to seal them better (they do not leak oil at all now) as per Jake Raby's comments in his Type IV rebuild video. Can there be a vacuum leak there?

Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post May 22 2016, 09:20 AM
Post #11


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(andreic @ May 22 2016, 06:10 AM) *

OK, trying to understand all the responses above. From what I have read, having a leak in the L-Jet makes the idle slower not faster. This is what the Cap'n seemed to be saying in the older thread, which I had read. So I am now looking for vacuum leaks. What I read I should try to do is spray carb cleaner at the manifold body (from the outside), and see if that changes the idle -- that would be an indication of leaks.

There are no air bleed passages at the idle adjustment screw as far as I can tell, it is just a big fat screw which adjusts how much air goes past the butterfly valve when it is closed.

I will do a valve adjustment today, and re-check the timing.

Was the comment about the airvalve referring to the AAR (auxiliary air regulator)? I did not see any adjustments on it...

Finally, the valve covers have been cleaned during the rebuild, and new gaskets installed. I did not put any kind of sealant to seal them better (they do not leak oil at all now) as per Jake Raby's comments in his Type IV rebuild video. Can there be a vacuum leak there?

Thanks!

not the aar. the big intake module that connects to the throttle body. it has the air metering flapper valve. on the top as you look at it there is a recessed slotted screw that meters air to by pass the flapper valve to adjust idle mixture. clockwise leans it out, counterclockwise richens it.

verify all the vacuum lines and fittings are connected and dont have cracks in them. l-jet is very sensitive to vacuum leaks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ClayPerrine
post May 22 2016, 02:37 PM
Post #12


Life's been good to me so far.....
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 15,442
Joined: 11-September 03
From: Hurst, TX.
Member No.: 1,143
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



The first thing I would look at are the fabric covered hoses that hook the intake plenum to the mainfolds. Those are notorious for cracking and causing a major vacuum leak that will not let the car idle.

Second thing are the oil cap seals. If both of them are not intact and working, the vacuum leak they cause will not let it idle.

Also check for cracks in the hose between the throttle body and the air flow meter. Cracks there will let air bleed by the air flow meter, causing the engine to run lean and die.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post May 22 2016, 07:09 PM
Post #13


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



If the FI system and engine are healthy the 9550 will cause you no problems. I developed that cam for your exact application.

If it's a 9550 and not the newer 9590, that cam must have been on a shelf somewhere for a long time. It was superseded in 2012 by the 9590.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andreic
post May 22 2016, 08:33 PM
Post #14


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 21-December 15
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 19,479
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Jake, I bought the cam from another fellow teener on the classifieds forums here on the world. He had had it for quite some time. It is a 9550 and it came with the parkerized lifters.

I'll keep hunting for vacuum leaks, now I am in the process of re-adjusting the valves after the break-in. Oddly enough, they seem very tight on the #2 cylinder. I'll report after I fix this and run it again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post May 23 2016, 12:43 PM
Post #15


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Tight valves effect valve timing, and cylinder pressure.. That alone can make the engine run like crap, and cause an erratic vacuum signal.. It can also cause reversion, which is the #1 enemy of stock EFI.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andreic
post May 23 2016, 02:29 PM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 21-December 15
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 19,479
Region Association: Upper MidWest



OK, I checked all valve settings. The are at 0.006 all around now (the #2 cylinder was tight, got adjusted). I adjusted the timing per published procedures (remove the two vacuum hoses from distributor, cap them, get idle to 800 RPM, use timing light to get the timing mark on the fan to show up in the little window).

After all this the engine ran better, though not perfect. I can get it now to idle at about 500 RPM (the needle on the tach barely lifts up), with the adjustment screw on the throttle body all the way out. If I remove and cap off the retard vacuum line, the idle goes up to about 950. I can get the idle much higher (1300-1400) by advancing the timing a bit, but I am not sure how this will play out at higher RPMS's. I'd like an idle of around 800-850.

What do you guys recommend? I can either get rid of the idle retard vacuum line, and leave the timing as it is (7.5 degrees BTDC at 800 RPM) or I could advance the timing and keep the idle retard vacuum line in place?

I triple checked for vacuum leaks everywhere, and have found none. I even tried spraying carb cleaner everywhere around the vacuum lines/intake manifold, and nothing changed.

Thanks, Andrei.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Big Len
post May 23 2016, 02:34 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,747
Joined: 16-July 13
From: Edgewood, New Mexico
Member No.: 16,126
Region Association: Southwest Region



The exhaust valve clearence on a 1.8 is .008 according to the late great Cap't Crusty and intake is .006.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post May 23 2016, 02:53 PM
Post #18


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



If you turn the air bypass screw IN what happens?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
timothy_nd28
post May 23 2016, 03:06 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,299
Joined: 25-September 07
From: IN
Member No.: 8,154
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(andreic @ May 23 2016, 12:29 PM) *

After all this the engine ran better, though not perfect. I can get it now to idle at about 500 RPM (the needle on the tach barely lifts up)


My friend, this is not 500

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post May 23 2016, 03:10 PM
Post #20


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,982
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Big Len @ May 23 2016, 01:34 PM) *

The exhaust valve clearence on a 1.8 is .008 according to the late great Cap't Crusty and intake is .006.


Nope. I believe that the Cap'n retracted that. It comes from one particular source that is wrong. The 0.006" is correct for both intake and exhaust on a 1.8, as well as for a 1.7, and even the intake on the 2.0 engine. The only place for 0.008" clearance is in the sodium-cooled 2.0 exhaust valve.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2024 - 08:21 AM