 Vacuum Hose Layout, '75 1.8 L-Jet |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
  |
| gfg3 |
 Jul 13 2016, 10:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Never Too Old  Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 5-January 15 From: Southern Virginia Member No.: 18,295 Region Association: None  |
I was checking through the layout of the vacuum hoses on my '75 1.8 and discovered that the PO had changed one of the connections from the decel valve. Picture below compares Jeff Bowlsby's standard diagram with my current setup. I have no EGR valve, no charcoal canister and no vacuum advance on the distributor, which is all fine. And, except for a minor cold idle problem, the car runs great.
Just curious whether the way the PO hooked things up makes any difference, or should I reconnect back to "normal"? Hey, if it's running fine I'm inclined to leave it the way it is. Thoughts?  |
   |
 
|
| Mark Henry |
Jul 13 2016, 11:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
How come no vac lines too the dizzy?
|
|
|
|
| gfg3 |
Jul 13 2016, 12:31 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Never Too Old Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 5-January 15 From: Southern Virginia Member No.: 18,295 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Jul 13 2016, 12:42 PM)  How come no vac lines too the dizzy? Not necessary. My dizzy is mechanical advance only. Car runs fine without vacuum advance. |
|
|
|
| Mark Henry |
Jul 13 2016, 07:04 PM
Post
#4
|
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
Which dizzy?
|
|
|
|
| gfg3 |
Jul 14 2016, 07:19 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Never Too Old Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 5-January 15 From: Southern Virginia Member No.: 18,295 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Jul 13 2016, 08:04 PM) Which dizzy? Dizzy is a Bosch 009. But we're getting off track here. I have no problem with the dizzy. My question was whether I should change the vacuum line between the decel valve and the throttle body (bottom picture, the way the PO installed it) back to "standard", between the decal valve and the manifold (top picture). If it makes no difference, I'll keep it where it is since the car runs just fine. I don't know how all the vacuum taps look inside the throttle body and manifold. |
|
|
|
| Dave_Darling |
Jul 14 2016, 05:25 PM
Post
#6
|
|
914 Idiot Group: Members Posts: 14,985 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California 
|
I believe that the way yours is set up now is that "ported" vacuum goes to the decel valve. What you want is manifold vacuum, from downstream of the throttle body.
--DD |
|
|
|
| gfg3 |
Jul 15 2016, 06:01 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Never Too Old Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 5-January 15 From: Southern Virginia Member No.: 18,295 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ Jul 14 2016, 06:25 PM) I believe that the way yours is set up now is that "ported" vacuum goes to the decel valve. What you want is manifold vacuum, from downstream of the throttle body. --DD Thanks Dave. I'm not sure what the difference is as it would affect the decl valve, but I'll switch things back to the standard arrangement to see how the engine reacts. As I said, car seems to be running fine the way it is......maybe even better with the switch. |
|
|
|
| gfg3 |
Jul 15 2016, 07:55 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Never Too Old Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 5-January 15 From: Southern Virginia Member No.: 18,295 Region Association: None |
OK, I found a chart that explains the difference. Thanks again Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 03:59 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.