Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V « < 3 4 5 6 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Turbocharging a type 4
HAM Inc
post Oct 20 2016, 02:23 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 846
Joined: 24-July 06
From: Watkinsville,GA
Member No.: 6,499
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 11:22 AM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 19 2016, 03:59 PM) *

QUOTE(Mueller @ Oct 19 2016, 03:55 PM) *

TIG welder (AC/DC) = check
Machine shop = check
Certified welder (expired) = check

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif)

This is the sort of project that I think would be cool for a highly skilled, well equipped enthusiast. Someone with the know how, the time, and finances to give it a go.
You should give this a try.


How much time do you estimate that job would take you in hours Len? Just like to have a baseline of time and or related cost. Thanks.

Hi Randal, I have no idea how much time it would take. It's not the sort of job I would be inclined to accept, but if I did it would be quoted on an hourly basis, broken down by categories: design/engineering; fabrication; machine/welding work.

There would be some major packaging hurdles to overcome to make this work.

I think a better approach would be to adapt 911 heads and go OHC. Mounted on top of Nickies with thermal coatings... That could work. Still lots of challenges, but it wouldn't be a big wet bandaid on a pair of ill suited heads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Oct 20 2016, 04:05 PM
Post #82


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750



QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 20 2016, 01:23 PM) *

QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 11:22 AM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 19 2016, 03:59 PM) *

QUOTE(Mueller @ Oct 19 2016, 03:55 PM) *

TIG welder (AC/DC) = check
Machine shop = check
Certified welder (expired) = check

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif)

This is the sort of project that I think would be cool for a highly skilled, well equipped enthusiast. Someone with the know how, the time, and finances to give it a go.
You should give this a try.


How much time do you estimate that job would take you in hours Len? Just like to have a baseline of time and or related cost. Thanks.

Hi Randal, I have no idea how much time it would take. It's not the sort of job I would be inclined to accept, but if I did it would be quoted on an hourly basis, broken down by categories: design/engineering; fabrication; machine/welding work.

There would be some major packaging hurdles to overcome to make this work.

I think a better approach would be to adapt 911 heads and go OHC. Mounted on top of Nickies with thermal coatings... That could work. Still lots of challenges, but it wouldn't be a big wet bandaid on a pair of ill suited heads.


That idea sounds like a better approach. And the cams would be reasonably easy to change. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif)

The "competition" to this would be buying one of the new boxster motors (300 or 350 HP/ 2.0 to 2.5 liters respectively) which will be available at a price less than $15K according to a few people I've talked with that will end up dealing with these motors.

But like the 911 heads approach, there would be engineering issues and might require a subframe to work. A 350hp motor in a 914 along with a transmission that would be designed for that HP, would be nice. The water cooling would be an issue and add weight. From what I've read the motors are plus/minus 25# of a fully configured 2.7 (6). http://blog.caranddriver.com/tech-dive-in-...ged-flat-fours/
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Oct 20 2016, 08:58 PM
Post #83


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750



QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 03:05 PM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 20 2016, 01:23 PM) *

QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 11:22 AM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 19 2016, 03:59 PM) *

QUOTE(Mueller @ Oct 19 2016, 03:55 PM) *

TIG welder (AC/DC) = check
Machine shop = check
Certified welder (expired) = check

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif)

This is the sort of project that I think would be cool for a highly skilled, well equipped enthusiast. Someone with the know how, the time, and finances to give it a go.
You should give this a try.


How much time do you estimate that job would take you in hours Len? Just like to have a baseline of time and or related cost. Thanks.

Hi Randal, I have no idea how much time it would take. It's not the sort of job I would be inclined to accept, but if I did it would be quoted on an hourly basis, broken down by categories: design/engineering; fabrication; machine/welding work.

There would be some major packaging hurdles to overcome to make this work.

I think a better approach would be to adapt 911 heads and go OHC. Mounted on top of Nickies with thermal coatings... That could work. Still lots of challenges, but it wouldn't be a big wet bandaid on a pair of ill suited heads.


That idea sounds like a better approach. And the cams would be reasonably easy to change. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif)

The "competition" to this would be buying one of the new boxster motors (300 or 350 HP/ 2.0 to 2.5 liters respectively) which will be available at a price less than $15K according to a few people I've talked with that will end up dealing with these motors.

But like the 911 heads approach, there would be engineering issues and might require a subframe to work. A 350hp motor in a 914 along with a transmission that would be designed for that HP, would be nice. The water cooling would be an issue and add weight. From what I've read the motors are plus/minus 25# of a fully configured 2.7 (6). http://blog.caranddriver.com/tech-dive-in-...ged-flat-fours/



And by the way, that 350hp motor, will eventually be RE'd and able to make HUGE power like the Subi's. But in the mean time, who has 350hp in a 914 autoX car, together with a Porsche motor?

Would sure like that configuration on any NWHA event.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Oct 20 2016, 10:54 PM
Post #84


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 07:58 PM) *

QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 03:05 PM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 20 2016, 01:23 PM) *

QUOTE(Randal @ Oct 20 2016, 11:22 AM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 19 2016, 03:59 PM) *

QUOTE(Mueller @ Oct 19 2016, 03:55 PM) *

TIG welder (AC/DC) = check
Machine shop = check
Certified welder (expired) = check

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif)

This is the sort of project that I think would be cool for a highly skilled, well equipped enthusiast. Someone with the know how, the time, and finances to give it a go.
You should give this a try.


How much time do you estimate that job would take you in hours Len? Just like to have a baseline of time and or related cost. Thanks.

Hi Randal, I have no idea how much time it would take. It's not the sort of job I would be inclined to accept, but if I did it would be quoted on an hourly basis, broken down by categories: design/engineering; fabrication; machine/welding work.

There would be some major packaging hurdles to overcome to make this work.

I think a better approach would be to adapt 911 heads and go OHC. Mounted on top of Nickies with thermal coatings... That could work. Still lots of challenges, but it wouldn't be a big wet bandaid on a pair of ill suited heads.


That idea sounds like a better approach. And the cams would be reasonably easy to change. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif)

The "competition" to this would be buying one of the new boxster motors (300 or 350 HP/ 2.0 to 2.5 liters respectively) which will be available at a price less than $15K according to a few people I've talked with that will end up dealing with these motors.

But like the 911 heads approach, there would be engineering issues and might require a subframe to work. A 350hp motor in a 914 along with a transmission that would be designed for that HP, would be nice. The water cooling would be an issue and add weight. From what I've read the motors are plus/minus 25# of a fully configured 2.7 (6). http://blog.caranddriver.com/tech-dive-in-...ged-flat-fours/



And by the way, that 350hp motor, will eventually be RE'd and able to make HUGE power like the Subi's. But in the mean time, who has 350hp in a 914 autoX car, together with a Porsche motor?

Would sure like that configuration on any NWHA event.


Im looking forward to the new porsche motors/tranis being cheap (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) They'll make great candidates for engine swaps!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd74914
post Oct 21 2016, 06:12 AM
Post #85


Its alive
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,780
Joined: 16-February 04
From: CT
Member No.: 1,659
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(stownsen914 @ Oct 20 2016, 06:13 AM) *

I understand that the water jacket idea had been done before on a 911 too. Might have been Grady Clay? Read about it on the Pelican forum at one point.

And, well, I've done a good but of MIG, but no TIG, so that might be a bit ambitious for me. Very cool idea though (pun intended!)


IIRC Grady shoots a water mist at cylinder heads and then uses the latent heat loss to water from evaporation to cool the heads. I bet it actually works pretty well with a small amount of water.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HAM Inc
post Oct 21 2016, 08:15 AM
Post #86


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 846
Joined: 24-July 06
From: Watkinsville,GA
Member No.: 6,499
Region Association: None



I have a customer who does vintage racing with a NA 914/4 in TX. He regularly runs on track temps exceeding 130F.

He recently reported that he rigged a nozzle that draws water from his cool suit cooler and squirts it in the fan. Says he does it about half way through his 40 minute races when CHT's start creeping up, and a time or two in the second half of the race. Says it uses about a 2 quarts of water and CHT's drop 30* or so.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Oct 21 2016, 09:49 AM
Post #87


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 21 2016, 07:15 AM) *

I have a customer who does vintage racing with a NA 914/4 in TX. He regularly runs on track temps exceeding 130F.

He recently reported that he rigged a nozzle that draws water from his cool suit cooler and squirts it in the fan. Says he does it about half way through his 40 minute races when CHT's start creeping up, and a time or two in the second half of the race. Says it uses about a 2 quarts of water and CHT's drop 30* or so.


I think this is the best method to keep the motor more or less "air cooled"

The water jacket idea can work but I wouldn't want to spend the time and money on a high dollar build and have something fail or get a hot spot due to inadequate flow and cook a head!

My last crazy idea for this thread.....water cooled valve covers! The idea is that if you can bolt the new aluminum valve covers (easy to machine something like that) to the the heads you can "suck" some of the heat out of them. Of course the cooling is super far away from the combustion chamber and it might take too long to be effective if really on the gas for long periods of time.

Not so crazy after all? ... Found a thread on the Samba about someone mentioning some 356 racers doing this by brazing tubes to the valve covers and running a 12vdc waterpump. Couldn't find pictures (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif)


I lied, one more crazy idea, weld more fins to the heads for more surface area....I swear, only sugar and milk in my coffee this morning!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jetsetsurfshop
post Oct 21 2016, 10:47 AM
Post #88


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 7-April 11
From: Marco Island Florida
Member No.: 12,907
Region Association: South East States



What about that Polo motor? You could turbo that right?
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/hide.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Oct 21 2016, 11:06 AM
Post #89


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jetsetsurfshop @ Oct 21 2016, 09:47 AM) *

What about that Polo motor? You could turbo that right?
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/hide.gif)



Unfortunately I would think that would be illegal in his class since not a "Porsche" block since they are brand new castings with a big Polopolus cast on the side of the block

http://www.polomotor.com/

That would be smart move here and while it might cost more than the upcoming 718 watercooled 4 banger Boxster engine combo it will be much much easier since it will not be easy to run that new direct injection motor more or less standalone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Oct 22 2016, 08:42 AM
Post #90


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mueller @ Oct 21 2016, 01:06 PM) *

http://www.polomotor.com/

That would be smart move here and while it might cost more than the upcoming 718 watercooled 4 banger Boxster engine combo it will be much much easier since it will not be easy to run that new direct injection motor more or less standalone.



Correct that the Polo motor would not be legal for PCA Racing. They cost a fortune, too ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iamchappy
post Oct 22 2016, 05:37 PM
Post #91


It all happens so fast!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,893
Joined: 5-November 03
From: minnetonka, mn
Member No.: 1,315
Region Association: Upper MidWest



This is so much easier.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Oct 23 2016, 11:02 AM
Post #92


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



I'd love to just turbo my 911 motor, but the hp index for 911 turbos is not advantageous. PCA club racing classifies the 911 turbo as 210 hp/L, while the type 4 turbo is 150 hp/L. To run a 2.0L 911 turbo, I'd have to add 200 lbs to my 914 and still bump up one class. With the type 4, I can do a 1.8 or 2.0L turbo and stay in the same class at my current weight (~2000 lbs with me in the car).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Oct 24 2016, 01:42 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



So if I did this with a T4, I think I understood that it would be better to start with a 1.7 or 1.8. I did some reading over the weekend, and it looks like the 1.7 heads may be sturdy. The carb 1.8 heads have the biggest valves of any T4 (not sure if that matters since I'd probably have to increase valve sizes anyway). And don't use a motor out of a bus since the heads are more likely to be trashed from hard use.

What's the best base T4 motor to start with for a small displacement turbo?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HAM Inc
post Oct 24 2016, 02:34 PM
Post #94


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 846
Joined: 24-July 06
From: Watkinsville,GA
Member No.: 6,499
Region Association: None



QUOTE(stownsen914 @ Oct 24 2016, 12:42 PM) *

So if I did this with a T4, I think I understood that it would be better to start with a 1.7 or 1.8. I did some reading over the weekend, and it looks like the 1.7 heads may be sturdy. The carb 1.8 heads have the biggest valves of any T4 (not sure if that matters since I'd probably have to increase valve sizes anyway). And don't use a motor out of a bus since the heads are more likely to be trashed from hard use.

What's the best base T4 motor to start with for a small displacement turbo?

If you want to follow the small bore (max 91mm) formula then you'll need to start with 1.7 heads with 100mm registers. 1.8 heads are not the same, they have 105mm registers.

Look for a cherry pair of 1.7 heads with a 'Q' suffix. They came on 914's and 411's, but not busses.

Find a 1.7 case from a 411 or 914.

Talk to Charles Navarro at LN Engineering about a Nickies and piston & rings combo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Oct 24 2016, 05:28 PM
Post #95


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I'm "that fellow" from Len's post #4. While I can appreciate the energy and enthusiasm of a turbo type IV, as Len stated, bring lots of money. While I enjoyed the challenge of developing the motor, I lost several autocross seasons trying to get it all to work right. See my build threads in my sig. I watched like a hawk the cht/egt/oil pressure and temp gauges, and thought I had a cool running motor. After the infinity shift, I sent the heads to Len, and he indicated they showed signs of heat abuse. As careful as I was just street tuning and autocrossing, and to have some heat damage to the heads, I would expect them to melt like butter in a racing environment.

And while Len does amazing work, he needs to put food on his table at home too. I wouldn't expect his work to come cheap.

So if you had an infinite supply of money and "Q" heads, I'd say go for it. You'll have allot of fun trying to figure it all out, and Len will be able to send his kids to any college they choose. I hear Harvard is nice.

IF I was to do it again: 1.7 Q heads per Len, and as much stroke as the rules would allow. Single plug. I'd go with Chris Foley flat fan, and have him gear the belt drive for as much cooling as I could get. I'd mount the intercooler as I did in my build, but over the engine fan, and use that draw to pull air thru the IC. If this restriction caused higher than expected CHT or EGT then I'd think about air/water intercooling. This will keep your pressure runs shorter than mounting an IC in the fender. Mount the water radiator there instead. Since this would be going in your race car, an old 1980's F1 style air scoop up and over the targa bar to feed either the top mount intercooler if that worked out, or to dump directly into the flat fan if you ended up with air/water. I'd not go with the ITB's, just a single would do. I used them because thats what I had on hand. E85 if the rules would allow. CHT sensors on each head. EGT on each exhaust pipe. Lots of warning lights for EGT/CHT oil temp overage. I'd think about an individual misting nozzle mounted in Chris's engine tin over each cylinder for additional cooling if needed. I'd dry sump it and run allot of oil, front mount radiator, with piston squirters. I'd pull all the trunk flooring out, and have a custom exhaust, possibly Chris again, to mount the turbo opposite the starter. Should make for nice short exhaust and pressure line runs. "Nickies" are not optional. They are a requirement. What ever ECU you use will need to data log all day long. It would be interesting to find a turbo that would provide as much boost to hit your goals with the least amount of heat. I'd think of RPM's staying south of 6k.

Torque powers your car out of the corners. HP gives you top speed at the end of the main straight. I'd not expect this to be a 7-8k rpm motor, if you expect it to live more then 1 session. So you'll need to consider tire size and gearing to work with a relatively low rev-ing more torque biased engine.

I've probably outlined a system that spends your budget 2-3 times. Before you buy dyno time and melt/re-build it all a couple times.

But it would be so awesome.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Oct 24 2016, 05:42 PM
Post #96


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 21 2016, 09:15 AM) *

I have a customer who does vintage racing with a NA 914/4 in TX. He regularly runs on track temps exceeding 130F.

He recently reported that he rigged a nozzle that draws water from his cool suit cooler and squirts it in the fan. Says he does it about half way through his 40 minute races when CHT's start creeping up, and a time or two in the second half of the race. Says it uses about a 2 quarts of water and CHT's drop 30* or so.



It'd be interesting to see about the CHT's for each hole- as much as there is not equal cooling via the air from the fan, I'm having a hard time with equal cooling from the water. He's shown it works- But you'd hate to think you were fine, and have one cylinder be a couple hundred degrees over the others.

Does he run a 4 x 4 system with an EGT and CHT for each cylinder? That would be some interesting data to see.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Oct 25 2016, 07:53 AM
Post #97


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 24 2016, 04:34 PM) *

If you want to follow the small bore (max 91mm) formula then you'll need to start with 1.7 heads with 100mm registers. 1.8 heads are not the same, they have 105mm registers.

Look for a cherry pair of 1.7 heads with a 'Q' suffix. They came on 914's and 411's, but not busses.



Thank you, Len. I will probably keep the displacement under 2L, but I am not sure about the configuration yet. Are the 1.7 heads preferable only due to the 100mm registers for staying with a small bore? From some reading I've been doing, it looks like the ports and sparkplug position on the 2.0 heads are better. If I were to go with a 94mm bore, would 2.0 heads be a better start? I am assuming that significant porting and machining will be part of whatever I do ...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ottox914
post Oct 25 2016, 09:00 AM
Post #98


The glory that once was.
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Mahtomedi, MN
Member No.: 1,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(stownsen914 @ Oct 25 2016, 08:53 AM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Oct 24 2016, 04:34 PM) *

If you want to follow the small bore (max 91mm) formula then you'll need to start with 1.7 heads with 100mm registers. 1.8 heads are not the same, they have 105mm registers.

Look for a cherry pair of 1.7 heads with a 'Q' suffix. They came on 914's and 411's, but not busses.



Thank you, Len. I will probably keep the displacement under 2L, but I am not sure about the configuration yet. Are the 1.7 heads preferable only due to the 100mm registers for staying with a small bore? From some reading I've been doing, it looks like the ports and sparkplug position on the 2.0 heads are better. If I were to go with a 94mm bore, would 2.0 heads be a better start? I am assuming that significant porting and machining will be part of whatever I do ...


Believe your specialists. They have your best interests in mind. The 1.7 Q has the right size register, and more "meat" in the head than any other factory casting. This gives Len room to do his magic and still end up with a head worth using. And he will do magic. Spark plug can be moved to the 2.0 location, valve sizes changed and porting done to your specifications. When he's done the part # and register size will be the only clues that these did not start out as factory 2.0 heads. But they will be much better suited to your plans.

There will be compromise here, between the valve sizes/air flow/register size you think you want, and the volcano of fire and heat you are going to subject these heads to turbo'd and track'd.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Oct 25 2016, 10:30 AM
Post #99


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Hey Len,

Can you point out where on this cross section the head is weakened due to too much heat?

Type4 on left, Type1 on right, pic "borrowed" from thesamba

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jetsetsurfshop
post Oct 25 2016, 10:39 AM
Post #100


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 7-April 11
From: Marco Island Florida
Member No.: 12,907
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Mueller @ Oct 25 2016, 08:30 AM) *

Hey Len,

Can you point out where on this cross section the head is weakened due to too much heat?

Type4 on left, Type1 on right, pic "borrowed" from thesamba

Attached Image


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) Cool pic.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

6 Pages V « < 3 4 5 6 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 01:40 PM