 2056 with D-Jet, who has tried? pass or fail? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
  |
| sean_v8_914 |
 May 7 2005, 11:34 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Chingon 601  Group: Members Posts: 4,011 Joined: 1-February 05 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,541  |
I would like to hear coments from those of you who have used the D-Jet on a 2056. (2.0 with 96mm pistons)
|
   |
 
|
| Aaron Cox |
May 7 2005, 11:35 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
joe sharp is using an LM-1 to aide in the effort to recalibrate the MPS
bleyseng had a ho 2056 with d jet also |
|
|
|
| MattR |
May 7 2005, 11:42 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California |
Yep, Joe sharp's Carerror is running D jet on 2056 with hydrolic lifters. Its a badass car with so much power...
|
|
|
|
| SirAndy |
May 7 2005, 11:50 PM
Post
#4
|
||
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,609 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/agree.gif) and his car runs and sounds great! (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/cool.gif) Andy |
||
|
|
|
||
| eeyore |
May 7 2005, 11:57 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 889 Joined: 8-January 04 From: meridian, id Member No.: 1,533 Region Association: None |
Read the PCA rulebook too. Section III, Article K. 2056 / 1971 = 1.04.
|
|
|
|
| ArtechnikA |
May 8 2005, 05:46 AM
Post
#6
|
||
|
rich herzog Group: Members Posts: 7,390 Joined: 4-April 03 From: Salted Roads, PA Member No.: 513 Region Association: None |
however - that is *not* "the" PCA rulebook. that is the Zone 8 Driving Event rulebook. all these rules are Zone and even Region-specific. (lots of guys on the West Coast - Zones 7 & 8 - don't realize that they are the only two Zones in PCA right now with Zone-wide events and consistent rulebooks.) there are only two rulebooks consistent across all of PCA: 1) the Parade Competition Rules, which are in effect for one event a year. 2) the PCA Club Race Rules |
||
|
|
|
||
| Bleyseng |
May 8 2005, 06:18 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,034 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
My 2056 Djet car has run great for 5+ years. Slight adjustments were made to tune the MPS using a A/F meter at a dyno.
My best dyno run was 95 hp at the rear wheels = about 110hp. I have it all apart for a cam change and new rings plus a better oil pump. Still waiting for the rings.. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif) |
|
|
|
| sean_v8_914 |
May 8 2005, 09:54 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Chingon 601 Group: Members Posts: 4,011 Joined: 1-February 05 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,541 |
pca rule book (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif) I'm so slow nobody would notice my 3.0 djet anyway
I just wanted to hear from those who made it work and what was required to make it work what compresion did you run? was it too lean with teh stock MPS? |
|
|
|
| Air_Cooled_Nut |
May 8 2005, 09:58 AM
Post
#9
|
||
|
914 Ronin - 914 owner who lost his 914club.com Group: Members Posts: 1,748 Joined: 19-April 03 From: Beaverton, Oregon Member No.: 584 Region Association: None |
95 whp (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/blink.gif) That's it? I would think it would be more...? My 2007cc Type 3 engine puts out 91whp on poorly tuned duel Dellortos. Wouldn't a Type 4 on FI put out more? Maybe the benefit is better gas mileage? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/unsure.gif) |
||
|
|
|
||
| anthony |
May 8 2005, 10:53 AM
Post
#10
|
||||
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218  |
This is interesting. You get assessed more points for switching to carbs:
It looks like going from D-Jet to Megasquirt or CIS to Megasquirt is points free. A loophole? |
||||
|
|
|
||||
| Bleyseng |
May 8 2005, 11:13 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,034 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
The stock FI cam limits your hp alot. Thats why I am switching cams and valve springs but lots of torque; about 108ftlbs at the rear wheels.
Adjusting the MPS depends on the mods you do. If you just change piston size a 043 MPS is still pretty close. After I put this engine back together I'll dyno it to see what it puts out. oh, most stock 2.0l's put out about 80-85 hp at the rear wheels that I have seen. |
|
|
|
| MattR |
May 8 2005, 11:39 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California |
Thats a bunch of power considering the fi power band. Joe's 2056 was one of the quicker 4's ive been in.
|
|
|
|
| TravisNeff |
May 8 2005, 11:48 AM
Post
#13
|
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,082 Joined: 20-March 03 From: Mesa, AZ Member No.: 447 Region Association: Southwest Region 
|
I think I have a big bore on my 2.0 DJET, flat top pistons, no dish at all - so probably 96's. Ran good!
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd May 2024 - 05:19 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.