Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Fuel injecting a larger displacement Type IV, fuel flow is easy what about air?
DNHunt
post Jul 9 2003, 09:54 AM
Post #1


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



Any FI gurus out there.

If I build a larger Type IV would it be possible to adapt the stock 2.0L intake to supply air. Tuning induction is kind of a mystery to me and I need some info. I understand that runner length and diameter and plenum volume are all important. Also engine displacement and cam duration and target RPM are important.

So, for the fun of it. Is it possible to use 2.0L intake on a 2270 with a Web Cam 163/86b. Target RPM 5000.

Doing a little dreaming here, hope to learn something too.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
DNHunt
post Jul 9 2003, 05:20 PM
Post #2


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



I'm just starting to get into this. It was interesting to me that even though I enlarged my throttle body to 50mm it appears I didn't flow any more air as my power curve on my dyno pulls falls off about the same as the published results for stock motors. It would seem to me that restrictions are elsewhere. Geoff says its the heads and I've also heard it's the cam. I certainly have no reason not to believe them.

Does anyone know if the intake was really tuned or was it more of a compromise to fit in the engine compartment? When I look at the stock runners it sure looks like they could easily be made longer by including a second bend. Could it be that a second bend would cause more turbulence and therefore offset any gains caused by ram effects? Is the broad power curve at least somewhat from a detuned intake? Could it be that the restrictions in the head at the exhaust port eliminate any gains from the intake?

I'm all questions and no answers, I'd appreciate any info.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 09:11 AM