help with 2.0 weber carb jets, I'm soooo confused!! |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
help with 2.0 weber carb jets, I'm soooo confused!! |
BK911 |
Jun 15 2018, 10:30 AM
Post
#1
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 672 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Rocky Top, TN Member No.: 1,674 Region Association: None |
I have two different charts that give two different settings:
28 vents, 1.35 main and .55 idle or 32 vents, 1.45 main and .60 idle. Bought a set of EMPIs for a 2.0 which came with: 28 vents, 1.25 main and .52 idle Read MANY threads here, samba and type4forum on proper jetting and vents and they are all over the place. Would like to get these together and installed asap. Is the current set up good enough for daily driving to/from work? No track, no AX, just cruising around TN back roads. |
Elliot Cannon |
Jun 15 2018, 10:45 AM
Post
#2
|
914 Guru Group: Retired Members Posts: 8,487 Joined: 29-December 06 From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast) Member No.: 7,407 Region Association: None |
The only help I can offer is to share my experience with my 44idf Webers. My engine is 2.2 liter type IV. My carbs are set up with 32 vents, F11 emulsion tubes, 130 main jets, 175 air jets and 55 idle jets. When the engine was first built it ran great once past about 2200 rpm. Prior to that it would NOT come off idle very well at all. A change of Idle jets pretty much solved that problem. About the best advice I can give is to buy, borrow or steal something to measure air/fuel mixture. This device and test drives might help you decide the jetting combination you want. It may take a bit of experimenting (and patience) to find the best combination for your engine but I think you will eventually get there. Good luck.
Cheers, Elliot |
aggiezig |
Jun 15 2018, 11:07 AM
Post
#3
|
Porsche Wannabe Group: Members Posts: 319 Joined: 13-January 16 From: Los Angeles, CA Member No.: 19,557 Region Association: Southern California |
|
nditiz1 |
Jun 15 2018, 11:57 AM
Post
#4
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,177 Joined: 26-May 15 From: Mount Airy, Maryland Member No.: 18,763 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
If they are 40s you want to start with a base of 28 vents , 115 main, 50 idle.
You can pull the main stack and solely drive around on just the idle to get a feel for the idle jets and where they will drop off. There are overlaps at each stage of the progression and you want to dial in each stage for best overlap in performance |
BK911 |
Jun 15 2018, 12:06 PM
Post
#5
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 672 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Rocky Top, TN Member No.: 1,674 Region Association: None |
40s on a bone stock 2.0.
|
rhodyguy |
Jun 15 2018, 12:08 PM
Post
#6
|
Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out. Group: Members Posts: 22,060 Joined: 2-March 03 From: Orion's Bell. The BELL! Member No.: 378 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
The 40s with the 28mm venturi. Good response off idle. Pretty good mileage. Put them on and see what you get. Swapping jet and such is simple with the carbs installed. New linkage? Don't forget the phenolic FI intake bases.
|
IronHillRestorations |
Jun 15 2018, 12:25 PM
Post
#7
|
I. I. R. C. Group: Members Posts: 6,714 Joined: 18-March 03 From: West TN Member No.: 439 Region Association: None |
I'll 2nd the set up with the 28's
|
MarkV |
Jun 15 2018, 02:03 PM
Post
#8
|
Fear the Jack Stands Group: Members Posts: 1,493 Joined: 15-January 03 From: Sunny Tucson, AZ Member No.: 154 Region Association: None |
I don't know my Delorto 40's came with 28's and it drove like a vw bus. I changed to 34's. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
|
porschetub |
Jun 15 2018, 02:12 PM
Post
#9
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,697 Joined: 25-July 15 From: New Zealand Member No.: 18,995 Region Association: None |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) with Perry,that jetting is a good starting point,those vents will provide good response and power in the normal driving range @ the expense of small power loss @ rpm you rarely use.
Keep the fuel pressure around 3psi and the engine properly tuned and you will have a nice running motor. |
amfab |
Jun 16 2018, 10:14 AM
Post
#10
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 391 Joined: 17-May 16 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 20,004 Region Association: None |
I have two different charts that give two different settings: 28 vents, 1.35 main and .55 idle or 32 vents, 1.45 main and .60 idle. Here is a thread on this topic: http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=89838 I am definitely no expert, but I too was looking for an easy answer for my 2.0. After lots of searching I came up with some info from Solex and Mark Harney to add to your confusion. What I gleaned was that jetting for a particular set up can vary and you need to mess around with your particular motor and driving style and power band desires. But: Solex has a formula for carb barrel sizing that says the barrel size should be .82 times the square root of the of the size of the cylinder in Cubic centimeters (2.0L divded by 4 cylndars=500cc) times the max RPM of the motor (5600 for a stock 2.0) divided by 1000—so 5.6. I will show the work: 500cc x 5.6=2800 Square root of 2800 is 52.92 52.92 x .82 (the Solex coefficient) is 43.39 So Solex is saying that a 40–44 diameter bore is a good size. Then Mark Harney’s formula says: Idle jet-1.6 x venturi Venturi-3-5 less than intake valve diameter (42 on a 2.0) Main Jet-4.2 x venturi size Air Corrector-200 as a starting point Based upon the above information for 40idf a good starting point is: Idle jet-54.40 (round to 55) Venturi-34.00 Main Jet-168 Air Corrector-200.00 These are just the best generic formulae I could find. Many people around here have A LOT of empirical experience with this so read their feedback. According to these formulae I should run in a 36idf (rounded): Idle jet-55 Venturi-34.00 Main Jet-150 Air Corrector-200.00 But I can't get a 34 venturi in a 36IDF like the Solex formula suggests so with the 32 venturis, using the Harney formula I should run: Idle jet-50 Venturi-32 Main Jet-150 Air Corrector-200.00 I never got to do this because I pulled the car off the road due to rust issues, but the formulae seemed to reflect the problems I was having with my car. The car popped a bit on deceleration—lean—indicating the idle jet is too small. Power got a little flat toward the top indicating a little bigger min jet may have helped My set up was Idle jet-47.00 Venturi-32.00 Main Jet-145.00 Air Corrector-220.00 So my symptoms are exactly what the formulae would have predicted. Of the two options you suggested, I think the 32 vents, 1.45 main and .60 idle would be the closest to what the above formulae suggest. I don't know if you can get 34 venturis. I think that the suggestions about the smaller venturis are probably better suited to the smaller valve heads of a 1.7 or 1.8 or type I motors. The 2.0 heads have a big intake valve. I would probably start with: Idle jet-50 or 55 Venturi-32.00 Main Jet-155–165 Air Corrector-200 Again, there are many here with a lot of experience with this—way more than I have. This is just some info I researched that I hope adds to the conversation. -Andrew |
MarkV |
Jun 16 2018, 10:40 AM
Post
#11
|
Fear the Jack Stands Group: Members Posts: 1,493 Joined: 15-January 03 From: Sunny Tucson, AZ Member No.: 154 Region Association: None |
They come new with 28mm vents... mine did. I ran them for a long time. Maybe if you are in to fuel economy and you only drive at low rpm you will be happy. I can tell you from experience that w/ 28's you give up pretty much all performance at mid to high rpm.
I started with: 28 vents .65 idle 1.22 main 195 air Changed to: 34 vents .60 idle 1.32 main 180 air Of the two choice you posted I would go with the 32's but I think a 1.45 main might be too big. The .60 idle you list should be good. |
rhodyguy |
Jun 16 2018, 11:02 AM
Post
#12
|
Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out. Group: Members Posts: 22,060 Joined: 2-March 03 From: Orion's Bell. The BELL! Member No.: 378 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
Op states 'bone stock 2.0'. I think the cam will be the limiting factor. It's going to runout of steam at the top end and I doubt he's going to run around @ 5.8k. Not a racer or ax'er. Driveability is the key.
|
72hardtop |
Oct 5 2018, 01:35 AM
Post
#13
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 120 Joined: 11-September 13 From: Seattle/HB Ca./Fujieda-Japan Member No.: 16,378 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
40 IDF's on a 2L?
28mm vents 47.5 - 50 idle jets (elevation near sea level or slightly above?) 120-125 main (likely 120) 180-190 air correctors F11 tubes Drive-ability when going to a performance carb such as an IDF is a bit of a trade off. Performance generally equates to less drive ability overall. No carb heat would be one thing on those brisk cool days. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 03:46 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |