Jalopnik 914 4 vs 6 article " Its only 10 HP" |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Jalopnik 914 4 vs 6 article " Its only 10 HP" |
MarkV |
Feb 12 2019, 12:02 AM
Post
#1
|
Fear the Jack Stands Group: Members Posts: 1,493 Joined: 15-January 03 From: Sunny Tucson, AZ Member No.: 154 Region Association: None |
https://jalopnik.com/its-time-for-some-real...sche-1832534488
The comments are interesting.... usual hate and a little love. Someone said that the 914 was "the last real Porsche introduced" being air cooled and all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grouphug.gif) |
Spoke |
Feb 12 2019, 06:59 AM
Post
#2
|
Jerry Group: Members Posts: 6,983 Joined: 29-October 04 From: Allentown, PA Member No.: 3,031 Region Association: None |
I think by the time the 2L /4 came out, it was too late as the 914 was already cast as a turd especially in the USA where muscle cars could smoke the tires in 1st and 2nd gears.
If the 2L /4 was the only /4 available starting in 1970, the 914 would have had a better future and reputation. That Porsche kept increasing the displacement and HP of the /6 for many years shows that Porsche woefully underestimated the importance of HP. The 1.7/1.8L /4 914's bore the brunt of turdism. |
Racer |
Feb 12 2019, 07:06 AM
Post
#3
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 787 Joined: 25-August 03 From: Northern Virginia Member No.: 1,073 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
The article was a little soft.. that said, yes, the 2.0/4 of 73-74 was a great engine for the car at the time and a reasonable substitute for the 2.0/6
Also consider the cars in-period competition. A 240Z was cheaper than a 914 and had near 911T/E performance. Performance wise, the 914 sat in the middle.. british roadsters at the bottom (Sprite, Midget, MGB, TR-6, Saab Sonnet, VW Karman Ghia etc) and then Z car, Corvette and 911's above. |
sithot |
Feb 12 2019, 07:28 AM
Post
#4
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 446 Joined: 25-October 06 From: Virginia Member No.: 7,090 Region Association: None |
The article was a little soft.. that said, yes, the 2.0/4 of 73-74 was a great engine for the car at the time and a reasonable substitute for the 2.0/6 Also consider the cars in-period competition. A 240Z was cheaper than a 914 and had near 911T/E performance. Performance wise, the 914 sat in the middle.. british roadsters at the bottom (Sprite, Midget, MGB, TR-6, Saab Sonnet, VW Karman Ghia etc) and then Z car, Corvette and 911's above. 240Z was the nail in the coffin. Having driven a 914/6 I kept for a couple of years for a friend and owning a 914 2.0 I can say without hesitation that the stock 6 wasn't worth the extra money BITD. The cars that will put a smile on your face have more hp through displacement which of course the factory never supplied. Even a 4 banger with displacement increase is better balanced. 000 Magazine (thank you Pete Stout) had an article last year where the author did a "what if" build of a 914. The choice of engine? A 4 cylinder of course. Weight matters. Ask Alois Ruf. |
Mayne |
Feb 12 2019, 07:33 AM
Post
#5
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 28-February 17 From: NM Member No.: 20,880 Region Association: None |
I think it’s a fair enough article. I love VW fours (just last night I drove next to a ratty Karmann Ghia in traffic and marveled at the unique sound) and the 2.0 was pretty much the best version. But I’ve driven enough sixes to know it’s just a different animal with smooth power, thoroughbred engineering and provenance, and with the right exhaust, an absolutely ripping sound. I’d take one of each!
|
gereed75 |
Feb 12 2019, 08:29 AM
Post
#6
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,247 Joined: 19-March 13 From: Pittsburgh PA Member No.: 15,674 Region Association: North East States |
I agree that the 2.0 four and 2.0 stock six were somewhat of a a toss up. The four had (has) a marvelous balance of sport and Teutonic efficiency that was truly a delight. I think the heart of that balance was the fuel injected motor and lightweight.
The stock six upset that balance. A snarling carbureted small beast that promised something special but did not quite deliver. But what this article does not touch on is the potential that the six represented - in proper tune (even at 2 liters) the six can deliver a visceral experience that borders on pure Porsche and pure sex - something that the four can just not do. Have owned all three - stock 73 two liter, stock six and an S built 2.4 six. I would call the two liter 4 a great car. The 2.4 six hotrod is a great car. The stock six - way Cool but not great. All IMHO of course. |
GeorgeRud |
Feb 12 2019, 10:08 AM
Post
#7
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,725 Joined: 27-July 05 From: Chicagoland Member No.: 4,482 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
I’ve been fortunate enough to have had all types (1.7, 2.0, 2.0 -6, and hot rod 2.7 -6). I’d agree that the 2.0 914 was great, the sound of a -6 can’t be dismissed and I wouldn’t trade that away. However, 200 rear wheel horsepower in a modified -6 is pure heaven. Luckily, there’s a seat for every behind!
|
gandalf_025 |
Feb 12 2019, 10:35 AM
Post
#8
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,453 Joined: 25-June 09 From: North Shore, Massachusetts Member No.: 10,509 Region Association: North East States |
I bought my 6 in 1973 and I can tell you I was never, EVER
chased down by any 4 cylinder 914 in that era... I guess the 1969 911 T Was a total dog also and not worth the money, or name of Porsche either.. since it had the same engine as a 6.. When I pulled my stock motor out in 1977, and replaced It with a 2.5 ss, I badged the car as a 2.0 and confused a lot of people.. Just saying.... |
mepstein |
Feb 12 2019, 10:46 AM
Post
#9
|
914-6 GT in waiting Group: Members Posts: 19,279 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
The great thing about our 914's is we can build them the way we want them. From a stock 1.7 to Clay's monster 4.0 - It's all possible. The only mod I made to my 3.2 conversion was to cut some holes for the oil tank and a couple smaller holes to run the lines to the front cooler. It could all be put back to stock in an afternoon. It never will but it just shows how versatile these cars are.
|
thelogo |
Feb 12 2019, 11:00 AM
Post
#10
|
Senior Member Group: Retired Members Posts: 1,510 Joined: 6-April 10 Member No.: 11,572 Region Association: None |
So if porsche would have put the 2.0 /6 from a 911 (s ) model
That would be the perfect small motor for these cars. A real screamer that would satisfy and beat a 240z But i guess they would have beat 911 too . So I get why they didn't |
mepstein |
Feb 12 2019, 11:31 AM
Post
#11
|
914-6 GT in waiting Group: Members Posts: 19,279 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
So if porsche would have put the 2.0 /6 from a 911 (s ) model That would be the perfect small motor for these cars. A real screamer that would satisfy and beat a 240z But i guess they would have beat 911 too . So I get why they didn't They did - sort of. They put in their lowest hp six. They had a 2.0S that made 180hp but the 914 was an “intro” Porsche. We did however get the mid engine option that the tail draggers could only dream about. The 914-6GT had a 2.0 six with around 225-230hp. |
Racer |
Feb 12 2019, 12:16 PM
Post
#12
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 787 Joined: 25-August 03 From: Northern Virginia Member No.: 1,073 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
Keeping it relative, the slices of pie are still the same (and if memory still works) ..
1970 914/4 1.7 - 80hp 1970 914/6 2.0/6 - 110hp * 1973 914 2.0/4 - 95hp * Euro rated at 100?, by '75-76 down to 86hp us) 1970 911T (2.2) 125hp 1970 911E (2.2) 155hp 1970 911S (2.2) 180hp *1997 Boxster 2.5- 201hp 2000 Boxster 2.7 - 217hp 2000 Boxster S 3.2- 252hp 2000 911 3.4 - 296hp 2018 718 (Boxster/Cayman) 2.0 - 300hp 2018 718S (Boxster/Cayman) 2.5 - 350hp 2018 911 3.0- 370hp Porsche has always been good about preserving the 911s status. Recall as well, the 1970 911T came with a 4spd (vs the -6's 5spd) as standard. And while the 911 had 15 more hp, it also weighed 100+ lbs more.. so it wasn't really that much faster. As for the -6, I kinda wish it had the '69E motor (2.0, 140hp) as its starting point, but I guess why it couldn't. Then again, sport muffler and larger venturies and you are right close to the 140 number with the 2.0t motor. "s" motor would be nice on the track. The "e" and "t" motors were much more tractable. Who wants fouled plugs just cause you only drove to the grocery store! I think one could also argue, Porsche could have bolstered the 914/6 status/pricing if it had the 2.2T with 125hp as its engine and made the BASE 911 the 155hp 911E. At least they didn't keep the 912 in the line up (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
horizontally-opposed |
Feb 12 2019, 01:12 PM
Post
#13
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,432 Joined: 12-May 04 From: San Francisco Member No.: 2,058 Region Association: None |
Have always viewed the stock 914-6 as +15hp to +25~hp, but less advantageous in terms of torque and its arrival—particularly once the -6's extra weight is factored in.
But…as someone stated here…the door opened once a six is in the car is a mighty one. I wonder how many 914-6s have been rebuilt to 110 hp, and how many remain 110 hp. The number can't be many, so I suspect the real advantage in the used 914-6 and six conversion market is something more like +40 to +120 hp over a stock four, with thinner and thicker deltas out there on the margins. |
ClayPerrine |
Feb 12 2019, 01:20 PM
Post
#14
|
Life's been good to me so far..... Group: Admin Posts: 15,474 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille |
Having owned all 3 versions of the 914 (/4, factory /6, modified /6), I have to say that the /4, when properly setup, is way faster and better handling than a factory /6.
Porsche could have done a better job with the /6, as shown by the LeMans winning 914/6 GT. But it would mean that the 911 would lose face, and no one at Porsche wanted that. Buy a factory six for the historical value. It is fun to drive, and is a conversation piece. But don't expect it to be a 911 killer in bone stock form. It was never meant to be one. Buy a /4 and hot rod the hell out of it to YOUR tastes. They are still cheap enough to customize any way you want. Do like I am doing and put in a motor that will let you tear up Corvettes. Or put in a 2056 /4 and go out and tear up corners with it. Or put in a Subaru and get a more reliable driver. Or put in an electric motor. Or put in a Mercedes 240d motor, and become a hypermiler. Or just sit in it and make vroom vroom noises. But do what makes YOU happy. But ignore the ignorant writers out there. They have probably never driven a 914, but they are 'serious journalists" who think their opinion matters more than the people who really know and love the 914. That is my $.02. Getting off my soap box and returning you to your regularly scheduled mayhem. |
Mayne |
Feb 12 2019, 02:01 PM
Post
#15
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 254 Joined: 28-February 17 From: NM Member No.: 20,880 Region Association: None |
Keeping it relative, the slices of pie are still the same (and if memory still works) .. 1970 914/4 1.7 - 80hp 1970 914/6 2.0/6 - 110hp * 1973 914 2.0/4 - 95hp * Euro rated at 100?, by '75-76 down to 86hp us) 1970 911T (2.2) 125hp 1970 911E (2.2) 155hp 1970 911S (2.2) 180hp *1997 Boxster 2.5- 201hp 2000 Boxster 2.7 - 217hp 2000 Boxster S 3.2- 252hp 2000 911 3.4 - 296hp 2018 718 (Boxster/Cayman) 2.0 - 300hp 2018 718S (Boxster/Cayman) 2.5 - 350hp 2018 911 3.0- 370hp Porsche has always been good about preserving the 911s status. It's an interesting list to see all at once. But it's also lists like this that encourage the Porsche-centric tendency to dismiss the lesser models throughout the history of the marque. If any of those "low level" cars had been produced in limited number by any other company, they'd be legends. But I guess they are legends anyway, just to the right people. Back to the six, it's remarkable how much the horsepower jumps going from T to E to S spec with the same displacement. |
GeorgeRud |
Feb 12 2019, 02:23 PM
Post
#16
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,725 Joined: 27-July 05 From: Chicagoland Member No.: 4,482 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
It would be interesting to also work out the power to weight ratios of these different model Porsches. That’s the real determinant of performance, with a lighter car of the same ratio having an edge.
However, Porsche will not do anything to tarnish the 911s reputation. |
mepstein |
Feb 12 2019, 02:56 PM
Post
#17
|
914-6 GT in waiting Group: Members Posts: 19,279 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
It would be interesting to also work out the power to weight ratios of these different model Porsches. That’s the real determinant of performance, with a lighter car of the same ratio having an edge. However, Porsche will not do anything to tarnish the 911s reputation. The 1967-911R was 1760lbs and 210hp. Porsche only built 4 since they didn't feel the public would buy a 911 that cost multiples of the base model. The public did when it came to the 73RS but Porsche was small in 67 and couldn't take the risk. I figured out how to get my 914-4 down to 1695lbs as a bare bones driver. With a 15% weight reduction, acceleration, cornering and braking should all be improved. |
Rav914 |
Feb 12 2019, 03:42 PM
Post
#18
|
All-weather fan Group: Members Posts: 738 Joined: 15-April 07 From: WA Member No.: 7,669 Region Association: None |
[/quote]
Even a 4 banger with displacement increase is better balanced. 000 Magazine (thank you Pete Stout) had an article last year where the author did a "what if" build of a 914. The choice of engine? A 4 cylinder of course. Weight matters. Ask Alois Ruf. [/quote] I think I've said it before, but this is the /4 I'd like to have in a 914. The POLO motor. Attached thumbnail(s) |
RARE 6 |
Feb 12 2019, 04:25 PM
Post
#19
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 141 Joined: 18-January 15 From: Grand Junction CO Member No.: 18,337 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
To each, his or her own. There is indeed a butt for every seat.
But, as someone who bought a brand new 1970 4 and traded it a year later for a brand new 914-6 I truly feel sorry for anyone who can't appreciate the difference. It was apparent from the first test drive in our -6 after a year and nearly 25,000 miles in the 1.7 and remained true through many years as a owner and former PCA driver ed instructor. In a dozen years of track events, out mostly stock -6 (larger venturis/front sway bar/heavier rear springs and adjusted ride height) never had a bit of trouble staying ahead of any similarly equipped stock 1.7, 1.8 or 2.0 four cylinder. Nor did we have any trouble with stock class 911 Ts. I have a dozen years of timed results to prove the point and it didn't make any difference whether it was me or my wife behind the wheel. Sure, all the well built but fragile high-dollar big 4s and the larger displacement 6s are very enjoyable and impressive. I appreciate the skill and dedication that goes into those types of builds but they're an entirely different animal. I've enjoyed and sometimes built everything from old Corvettes, Jeeps, Land Cruisers, Karmann Ghias and Model As. But after nearly 50 years of continuous 914 ownership, apples to apples, there's a marked difference between VW power and Porsche power, not to mention other build differences that go beyond just horsepower. |
pete000 |
Feb 12 2019, 04:40 PM
Post
#20
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,885 Joined: 23-August 10 From: Bradenton Florida Member No.: 12,094 Region Association: South East States |
The sound of the six is worth the price of admission...IMHO
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 06:11 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |