Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cabin Heat, Heat Exchangers
jim_hoyland
post Aug 12 2019, 08:35 PM
Post #1


Get that VIN ?
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,328
Joined: 1-May 03
From: Sunset Beach, CA
Member No.: 643
Region Association: Southern California



Do the SS heat exchangers allow for a faster cabin warm up - from your experience.
About a year ago, I replaced the SS exchangers for OEMs on my ‘75 1.8
It seems like the cabin would heat up faster with the SS ?
Flappers are good, cables properly set, and fan operates
Anyone been down this road?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jcd914
post Aug 12 2019, 09:48 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,081
Joined: 7-February 08
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 8,684
Region Association: Northern California



In my experience, yes SS heat exchangers transfer more heat faster.
The SS tubing has thinner wall and I believe SS transfers heat faster as well.

But real world experience, yes they heat the car faster.

Jim
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Aug 13 2019, 04:30 AM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,903
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(jcd914 @ Aug 12 2019, 07:48 PM) *

In my experience, yes SS heat exchangers transfer more heat faster.
The SS tubing has thinner wall and I believe SS transfers heat faster as well.

But real world experience, yes they heat the car faster.

Jim



Stainless is an extremely poor conductor of heat infact much worse then stock steel.. What you are likely experiencing is thinner materials as you mentioned..
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rfinegan
post Aug 13 2019, 08:04 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 974
Joined: 8-February 13
From: NC
Member No.: 15,499
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I think its the design change of the back dated exchangers that make the difference
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Aug 13 2019, 10:20 AM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,205
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(mb911 @ Aug 13 2019, 03:30 AM) *

QUOTE(jcd914 @ Aug 12 2019, 07:48 PM) *

In my experience, yes SS heat exchangers transfer more heat faster.
The SS tubing has thinner wall and I believe SS transfers heat faster as well.

But real world experience, yes they heat the car faster.

Jim



Stainless is an extremely poor conductor of heat infact much worse then stock steel.. What you are likely experiencing is thinner materials as you mentioned..

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)


I had a side project to ceramic coat the inside of a stock HE and and the outside of the shells with entropic and insulating coatings. I sold them to Rob back East a while back for him to continue it since I sold my car.

I think what happens over time is that they.....yes......wait for it......rust, and then that is a inhibiting factor in the heat transfer and then air flow......from a previous thread, a poor conductor of heat.

Same thing on the cylinders...they rust and then conduct heat poorly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 04:56 AM