Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Maximum Allowable Variance in Deck Height, Stock 2.0 Liter Four
motorvated
post Jan 18 2020, 10:18 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 13-February 13
From: Colorado
Member No.: 15,519
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I'm in the process of re-assembling the top end of my stock 2.0 liter four, and I have measured deck heights as follows:
#1 - 0.036
#2 - 0.029
#3 - 0.037
#4 - 0.035

These measurements are with the cylinder base sealing rings in place and the cylinders torqued down snugly and measured with a dial gauge. To me it seems as if I need to add a shim to the bottom of cylinder #2 approx. 0.050 - 0.080 to increase its deck height to within the range of the others. I have a couple of used 0.080 shims, one of which I could add to cylinder #2 to bring it up to 0.037.

I have a couple of questions about this.

First, how much variance is permissible between the measurements? If the deck heights are all within 0.002 of one another, is that Ok or do they need to be exactly the same.

Second, can I re-use one of my 0.080 shims or should I source a new one.

And third, do I place the shim on top of the cylinder sealing ring, beneath it, or doesn't it matter. I was planning on putting it on top of the sealing ring.

Thanks in advance for your advice.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 19)
motorvated
post Jan 18 2020, 10:19 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 13-February 13
From: Colorado
Member No.: 15,519
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(motorvated @ Jan 18 2020, 09:18 AM) *

I'm in the process of re-assembling the top end of my stock 2.0 liter four, and I have measured deck heights as follows:
#1 - 0.036
#2 - 0.029
#3 - 0.037
#4 - 0.035

These measurements are with the cylinder base sealing rings in place and the cylinders torqued down snugly and measured with a dial gauge. To me it seems as if I need to add a shim to the bottom of cylinder #2 approx. 0.005 - 0.008 to increase its deck height to within the range of the others. I have a couple of used 0.080 shims, one of which I could add to cylinder #2 to bring it up to 0.037.

I have a couple of questions about this.

First, how much variance is permissible between the measurements? If the deck heights are all within 0.002 of one another, is that Ok or do they need to be exactly the same.

Second, can I re-use one of my 0.080 shims or should I source a new one.

And third, do I place the shim on top of the cylinder sealing ring, beneath it, or doesn't it matter. I was planning on putting it on top of the sealing ring.

Thanks in advance for your advice.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Krieger
post Jan 18 2020, 10:33 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,704
Joined: 24-May 04
From: Santa Rosa CA
Member No.: 2,104
Region Association: None



Have you measured the individual cylinder heights? Or piston pin to top of piston? I'd be looking for where the variance is. If the cylinders heights are all different I would pay a machinist to make them the same ""height" . get new gaskets when assembling. Most everyone does not use cylinder to head sealing ring.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iankarr
post Jan 18 2020, 10:48 AM
Post #4


The wrencher formerly known as Cuddy_K
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,472
Joined: 22-May 15
From: Heber City, UT
Member No.: 18,749
Region Association: Intermountain Region



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
I know just enough about engines to get myself in trouble and I’m sure the gurus will reply, but you ideally want the deck height to be consistent. Shims should added To control the compression ratio...not make up differences.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Jan 18 2020, 11:25 AM
Post #5


Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out.
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,070
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's Bell. The BELL!
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



Did you have you case 'decked'?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
motorvated
post Jan 18 2020, 11:49 AM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 13-February 13
From: Colorado
Member No.: 15,519
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(rhodyguy @ Jan 18 2020, 10:25 AM) *

Did you have you case 'decked'?


No. Case has not been decked, as this was supposed to be just a top end inspection and refresh with new rings, gaskets, and seals. Should have measured deck height before taking it apart. There might have been a cylinder base shim under #2 to begin with. Haven't measured cylinder head volumes yet, but they also should be consistent so the deck heights should be consistent also so that the compression ratio is the same for each cylinder. At least that's my understanding. If I were doing a total rebuild, I'd definitely get the case decked.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IronHillRestorations
post Jan 18 2020, 12:19 PM
Post #7


I. I. R. C.
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,714
Joined: 18-March 03
From: West TN
Member No.: 439
Region Association: None



I haven't built a type 4 in years, but I do know that the cylinder registers can sink and cause a problem. I'd carefully measure the cylinders and put a precision straight edge across the case registers to make sure it's nice and level.

Either way, you need to find out why there's difference.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bbrock
post Jan 18 2020, 12:24 PM
Post #8


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,269
Joined: 17-February 17
From: Montana
Member No.: 20,845
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(IronHillRestorations @ Jan 18 2020, 11:19 AM) *

I haven't built a type 4 in years, but I do know that the cylinder registers can sink and cause a problem. I'd carefully measure the cylinders and put a precision straight edge across the case registers to make sure it's nice and level.

Either way, you need to find out why there's difference.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) I fought mine for some time scratching my head because register and barrel didn't explain the difference I was seeing and finally figured out it was the distance from wrist pin bore to piston top making the difference. And that was on old OEM Mahle pistons purchased new in the early 80s!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
motorvated
post Jan 18 2020, 01:43 PM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 13-February 13
From: Colorado
Member No.: 15,519
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(rhodyguy @ Jan 18 2020, 10:25 AM) *

Did you have you case 'decked'?


No. Case has not been decked, as this was supposed to be just a top end inspection and refresh with new rings, gaskets, and seals. Should have measured deck height before taking it apart. There might have been a cylinder base shim under #2 to begin with. Haven't measured cylinder head volumes yet, but they also should be consistent so the deck heights should be consistent also so that the compression ratio is the same for each cylinder. At least that's my understanding. If I were doing a total rebuild, I'd definitely get the case decked.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Jan 18 2020, 07:11 PM
Post #10


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



All I know is you want a minimum of .040”” clearance so order shims to set it correctly
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
yeahmag
post Jan 18 2020, 07:47 PM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,421
Joined: 18-April 05
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 3,946
Region Association: Southern California



The individual deck heights are less of a concern than having each pair of cylinders even. I use to make a tool to do this, but you can probably work something out with a straight edge, some spacers, and the cylinder head nuts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 18 2020, 07:59 PM
Post #12


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(cuddy_k @ Jan 18 2020, 11:48 AM) *

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
I know just enough about engines to get myself in trouble and I’m sure the gurus will reply, but you ideally want the deck height to be consistent. Shims should added To control the compression ratio...not make up differences.

Correct. I also agree with the .040" minimum deck, you have to know what you're doing to set it any smaller.

Try swapping piston #2 with #3 and see if it makes a difference.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jsaum
post Jan 19 2020, 06:43 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 12-June 07
From: Everett, WA
Member No.: 7,809
Region Association: None



QUOTE(yeahmag @ Jan 18 2020, 05:47 PM) *

The individual deck heights are less of a concern than having each pair of cylinders even. I use to make a tool to do this, but you can probably work something out with a straight edge, some spacers, and the cylinder head nuts.

I picked up one of your tools used. Were there any write ups or instructions on how to use it? I found the original pictures and see how it’s bolted up and seen how the plate locates over the pistons. What type of mounting is used for the dial indicator?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Jan 20 2020, 08:42 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



Where are you measuring the deck height? I assume near the perimeter of the piston? If so, there can be variation due to rocking of the piston, so a single measurement point can yield a range of inconsistent values. It's good to measure at opposite sides of the piston and average the readings. One easy way is to put a small strip of solder on each side of the piston crown, torque the head on and measure the crushed solder.

Edit - should have mentioned that it's best to turn the engine over to crush the solder.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 20 2020, 09:51 AM
Post #15


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(jsaum @ Jan 19 2020, 07:43 PM) *

QUOTE(yeahmag @ Jan 18 2020, 05:47 PM) *

The individual deck heights are less of a concern than having each pair of cylinders even. I use to make a tool to do this, but you can probably work something out with a straight edge, some spacers, and the cylinder head nuts.

I picked up one of your tools used. Were there any write ups or instructions on how to use it? I found the original pictures and see how it’s bolted up and seen how the plate locates over the pistons. What type of mounting is used for the dial indicator?



Aaron I think I inherited one of your tools, is it two machined alunimum bars with a keyed plate that drops in for measuring deck and 4 spacers?

I'm using it for the first time and have to say it's a nice piece of T4 kit. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumb3d.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
motorvated
post Jan 20 2020, 10:35 AM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 13-February 13
From: Colorado
Member No.: 15,519
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Jan 20 2020, 08:51 AM) *

QUOTE(jsaum @ Jan 19 2020, 07:43 PM) *

QUOTE(yeahmag @ Jan 18 2020, 05:47 PM) *

The individual deck heights are less of a concern than having each pair of cylinders even. I use to make a tool to do this, but you can probably work something out with a straight edge, some spacers, and the cylinder head nuts.

I picked up one of your tools used. Were there any write ups or instructions on how to use it? I found the original pictures and see how it’s bolted up and seen how the plate locates over the pistons. What type of mounting is used for the dial indicator?



Aaron I think I inherited one of your tools, is it two machined alunimum bars with a keyed plate that drops in for measuring deck and 4 spacers?

I'm using it for the first time and have to say it's a nice piece of T4 kit. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumb3d.gif)


I was measuring at the edge of the piston, but 90° from the plane of the wrist pin, so I think a rocking piston gave me a poor reading. When I rotated the engine and measured along the plane of the wrist pin I measured the deck height of cylinder #2 at 0.037, a value consistent with the other three cylinders. This is after installing a 0.008 shim on the base of cylinder #2 and putting a straight edge across the top of cylinders #1 and #2 to make sure they are both the same height, which they are. Since I am installing head gaskets that measure out at 0.0035 thickness, my final deck height is right around 0.,040, which seems to be the safe target height. So it looks like I'm good to go. Thanks for advice and help on this. I really should have fabricated up a nice stable plate system to use with the dial gauge so my measurements could have been made more easily and at the correct positions. I'll do that for the next rebuild of my 1.8 liter.














User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 20 2020, 03:26 PM
Post #17


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



I haven't used head shims since the 90's and I wouldn't use them with 96mm cylinders.
You have to measure along the same plane as the pin.

Are you doing a proper CR?
You should be doing this, CC on the heads, deck height and use a CR calculator.

http://cbperformance.com/v/enginecalc.html
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Jan 22 2020, 02:35 PM
Post #18


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,029
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(jsaum @ Jan 19 2020, 04:43 PM) *
I picked up one of your tools used. Were there any write ups or instructions on how to use it? I found the original pictures and see how it’s bolted up and seen how the plate locates over the pistons. What type of mounting is used for the dial indicator?
try this ~

Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
motorvated
post Jan 22 2020, 03:19 PM
Post #19


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 13-February 13
From: Colorado
Member No.: 15,519
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(914werke @ Jan 22 2020, 01:35 PM) *

QUOTE(jsaum @ Jan 19 2020, 04:43 PM) *
I picked up one of your tools used. Were there any write ups or instructions on how to use it? I found the original pictures and see how it’s bolted up and seen how the plate locates over the pistons. What type of mounting is used for the dial indicator?
try this ~

Attached Image


That looks great. How is the dial gauge connected so that you can slide it from the cylinder onto the edge of the piston?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jan 22 2020, 03:24 PM
Post #20


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



That's the one I have but it also has a plate that drops in between and is keyed to the half circle cut outs you see on the bars. No need to use a dial indicator, a vernier caliper zeroed on the plate is good enough.

Used it again today, got +/- .001 on all cylinders, .041 deck no base shim on KB pistons. Little lower CR than I was aiming for with stock heads, but acceptable so they went in with no shims or head gaskets.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 01:05 AM