Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Factory 914-6 engine mount clearance issue?, When used on a 3.2 or 3.6
Luke M
post Mar 29 2020, 06:50 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,368
Joined: 8-February 05
From: WNY
Member No.: 3,574
Region Association: North East States



Thinking of getting a 3.2 or a 993 3.6. If using the factory 914-6 engine mount will I run into any clearance issues around the crank pulley area?

I know of a few other issues that I may encounter. For you 3.2 and 3.6 guys out there any words of wisdom before I jump into this?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Mar 29 2020, 07:14 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,544
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



Never done it but understand pully has to be changed which elimenates
accessory drive ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Luke M
post Mar 29 2020, 07:25 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,368
Joined: 8-February 05
From: WNY
Member No.: 3,574
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(rgalla9146 @ Mar 29 2020, 06:14 AM) *

Never done it but understand pully has to be changed which elimenates
accessory drive ?



Hi Rory,

I just do not want to have to cut up a nice factory 6 mount. I have several different crank pulleys here that I could try out if need be. That would also change the fan ratio/speed too.

I'll send you a pm later on the other stuff we talked about.

Thanks,
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Mar 29 2020, 08:01 AM
Post #4


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(rgalla9146 @ Mar 29 2020, 09:14 AM) *

Never done it but understand pully has to be changed which elimenates
accessory drive ?


AC pulley won't work without major mods, find a single pulley with the same fan drive size. IIRC any air cooled pulley will work but there's a few different sizes of the crank pulley and then there's a couple different sizes of the fan pulleys.
Do a search on pelican, there was a list of the different sizes.

I went with the SC sized pulleys on the right , I can just sneak the belt past the tin, would be a PITA to change the belt in car without my big access hole.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads/post-26-1391692879.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Mar 29 2020, 08:25 AM
Post #5


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,222
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Can't you just put the double pulley on a lathe and knock off the smaller one?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Mar 29 2020, 08:30 AM
Post #6


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,801
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(mepstein @ Mar 29 2020, 06:25 AM) *

Can't you just put the double pulley on a lathe and knock off the smaller one?



Yes..
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IronHillRestorations
post Mar 29 2020, 08:48 AM
Post #7


I. I. R. C.
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,714
Joined: 18-March 03
From: West TN
Member No.: 439
Region Association: None



Pretty sure the lower pulley on a 3.6 is also harmonic balancer
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Steve
post Mar 29 2020, 09:20 AM
Post #8


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,565
Joined: 14-June 03
From: Orange County, CA
Member No.: 822
Region Association: Southern California



I took the single pulley off of my 2.7 and put it on my 3.2. I still have the double pulley off of the 3.2 in a box somewhere. I am using the rich Johnson Mount.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bahnzai
post Mar 29 2020, 10:50 AM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 305
Joined: 26-July 06
From: Columbia, SC
Member No.: 6,509
Region Association: South East States



Here is a 3.6 with a stock mount unmodified. As others noted, only room for single belt.
My conversion already had the stock mount installed. If I were starting from scratch, I would use the style Bob Saville or Patrick Motorsports offers. Looks much easier/quicker to drop the motor.

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Mar 29 2020, 10:58 AM
Post #10


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,801
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(bahnzai @ Mar 29 2020, 08:50 AM) *

Here is a 3.6 with a stock mount unmodified. As others noted, only room for single belt.
My conversion already had the stock mount installed. If I were starting from scratch, I would use the style Bob Saville or Patrick Motorsports offers. Looks much easier/quicker to drop the motor.

Attached Image



The problem with those above mentioned mounts is that it mounts the engine about 3/4" lower in the chassis thus making the seals not able to meet up.. Then you also can't use a stock style oil line set up.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Mar 29 2020, 11:18 AM
Post #11


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(mb911 @ Mar 29 2020, 12:58 PM) *




The problem with those above mentioned mounts is that it mounts the engine about 3/4" lower in the chassis thus making the seals not able to meet up.. Then you also can't use a stock style oil line set up.


I have my nose dropped close to 3/4" and I think my seals fit better. I have be sure to hook them over the tin edge when I install, but they stay perfectly in place.
I can't use the stock oil pipe as I made my own mount which is much like a RJ mount.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Luke M
post Mar 29 2020, 11:23 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,368
Joined: 8-February 05
From: WNY
Member No.: 3,574
Region Association: North East States



I currently have a 131 mm crank pulley and stock 6 upper.
With the 131 mm installed it's tight to swap out the belt.
I don't think I would be able to get one on if needed. Maybe with the fan access hole cut into the firewall. Yeah I know some would say bad idea.. I also have a 3.2, 2 belt and single pulley here. I'll have to find them so I can test it out. I believe the 3.6 engine mount is a totally different style mount ? I'm also gonna stay with the factory 6 mount not an aftermarket unit.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JOEPROPER
post Mar 29 2020, 12:01 PM
Post #13


The answer is "no" unless you ask...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,184
Joined: 21-November 15
From: White Plains New York
Member No.: 19,387
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(mb911 @ Mar 29 2020, 12:58 PM) *

QUOTE(bahnzai @ Mar 29 2020, 08:50 AM) *

Here is a 3.6 with a stock mount unmodified. As others noted, only room for single belt.
My conversion already had the stock mount installed. If I were starting from scratch, I would use the style Bob Saville or Patrick Motorsports offers. Looks much easier/quicker to drop the motor.

Attached Image



The problem with those above mentioned mounts is that it mounts the engine about 3/4" lower in the chassis thus making the seals not able to meet up.. Then you also can't use a stock style oil line set up.

Sorry to go backwards, but which above mentioned mounts are you referring to Ben? PMS / NARO RACING? or RJ or factory 6?
Also excuse my ignorance... thanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Mar 29 2020, 12:24 PM
Post #14


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,801
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Sorry naroscape and pms..
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Mar 29 2020, 01:40 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,544
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



I agree with Mark that the second groove can be machined off the original pulley.

Also,there should be a known correct distance from the
engine shelf down to crank centerline.
In my experience mechanics either don't bother to engage the seals to the engine tin
or it tends to get loose on its own. It's an important barrier.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gms
post Mar 30 2020, 09:05 AM
Post #16


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,694
Joined: 12-March 04
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 1,785
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Luke, you could use a Clewett crank pulley?

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Luke M
post Mar 30 2020, 02:22 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,368
Joined: 8-February 05
From: WNY
Member No.: 3,574
Region Association: North East States



I'm waiting to hear back about a 993 3.6. If it doesn't work out I'll go with a 3.2.

Any one have a late 84-86 915 trans converted with Bott's 916 kit all done that they may want to part with?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Mar 30 2020, 02:35 PM
Post #18


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,222
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Luke M @ Mar 30 2020, 04:22 PM) *

I'm waiting to hear back about a 993 3.6. If it doesn't work out I'll go with a 3.2.

Any one have a late 84-86 915 trans converted with Bott's 916 kit all done that they may want to part with?

Didn’t LarryM have the trans and kit for sale some time ago.

Found it - http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...2&hl=Martin
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Steve
post Mar 30 2020, 04:33 PM
Post #19


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,565
Joined: 14-June 03
From: Orange County, CA
Member No.: 822
Region Association: Southern California



Maybe also check with http://www.tangerineracing.com/
They build quite a few of them and had one for sale awhile back
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RiqueMar
post Apr 6 2020, 09:32 PM
Post #20


Enrique Allen Mar
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,169
Joined: 28-August 08
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 9,478
Region Association: Southern California



Should you change your mind, and decide to use the actual /6 mount, I went that route, and only had to slightly modify the cone.
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...8955&st=680


Hope this helps and best of luck!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 03:38 PM