![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Shivers |
![]()
Post
#21
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,982 Joined: 19-October 20 From: La Quinta, CA Member No.: 24,781 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
Could one of you guy's post a few pics for us interested in reproducing the 75-76 fuel pump access opening and plate. A measurement of the opening would be awesome. Thank you. The opening is approximately 6.5" x 2.5" but it is best to have a 75-76 blister cover in hand to make a template. I just test mounted my pump in my retrofit opening yesterday. Pics below and here's a link to my process for cutting the opening. http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?s=&...t&p=2652159 And if I were the OP, I'd do as others have suggested and put it in the steering rack area the same as the factory specified for pump relocation per recall. That's where mine was when I bought my car and it worked find in that location.. Thank you. I'll have a look at the rack area |
914werke |
![]()
Post
#22
|
"I got blisters on me fingers" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11,248 Joined: 22-March 03 From: USofA Member No.: 453 Region Association: Pacific Northwest ![]() ![]() |
Could one of you guy's post a few pics for 75-76 fuel pump access opening and plate. If anyone is interested I have that panel cut from a donor car + cover that I would let go, but you gotta be ready to (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif) |
Jamie |
![]()
Post
#23
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 13-October 04 From: Georgetown,KY Member No.: 2,939 Region Association: South East States ![]() ![]() |
|
Jamie |
![]()
Post
#24
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 13-October 04 From: Georgetown,KY Member No.: 2,939 Region Association: South East States ![]() ![]() |
I went through this over the winter. My car is a 1970 1.7. Years ago the PO had a mechanic mount the 3 port pump up front by zip tying it to the steering rack. It was a mess. I redid all of the fuel lines using Chris Foley's tunnel lines and his fuel pump mount. This provides great access to the filter and pump but I had a heck of a time getting the lines routed and all of this to fit without kinking the fuel line. It's working now though and I've got a few hundred miles on it. The pic is in process. I couldn't find one with it all hooked up but this will give you an idea of what I did. I eliminated a lot of extra hose and potential kinks by bending U forms from metal fuel line tubing. Makes a very neat installation possible. |
bkrantz |
![]()
Post
#25
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,361 Joined: 3-August 19 From: SW Colorado Member No.: 23,343 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
Thanks, everyone. I have gone ahead with my idea to mount the pump under the tank, on the right side, with a hope I can pull the pump if necessary through the big round access hole.
To make that possible I drilled a half inch hole in the "floor" above the steering rack. This allows a screw driver to reach the bolt on the pump clamp. Attached thumbnail(s) ![]() |
bkrantz |
![]()
Post
#26
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,361 Joined: 3-August 19 From: SW Colorado Member No.: 23,343 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
Here's the hole from above.
More pics when I get this done. Attached thumbnail(s) ![]() |
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#27
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,264 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
What do you all think of this location for mounting my new pump in the front? Besides space, I have some other goals: 1. Avoiding mounting on any sheet metal shared with the passenger compartment. 2. As much protection as possible. 3. Short fuel line runs between the tank, filter, pump, and hard lines. 4. Access to the lines without pulling the tank. 5. Access to the pump without pulling the tank. My proposed location probably does not satisfy goal 5 (maybe), but otherwise I like it. Don't put it under the tank or the rack cover. All goals including 5 can be had by putting it just behind the firewall behind the passenger seat on the engine compartment side. It's not near the exhaust and you can easily get to it to inspect the filter and run minimal flexible fuel lines. If there is an issue with the pump, you can easily get to and and no Rube Goldberg arcs with the fuel line to kink to try to hit the fuel line opening in the tunnel. Mount it with some rivnuts and the stock threaded bushings. Did a thread on it many many moons ago. Good luck...you did ask for advice. |
bkrantz |
![]()
Post
#28
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,361 Joined: 3-August 19 From: SW Colorado Member No.: 23,343 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
What do you all think of this location for mounting my new pump in the front? Besides space, I have some other goals: 1. Avoiding mounting on any sheet metal shared with the passenger compartment. 2. As much protection as possible. 3. Short fuel line runs between the tank, filter, pump, and hard lines. 4. Access to the lines without pulling the tank. 5. Access to the pump without pulling the tank. My proposed location probably does not satisfy goal 5 (maybe), but otherwise I like it. Don't put it under the tank or the rack cover. All goals including 5 can be had by putting it just behind the firewall behind the passenger seat on the engine compartment side. It's not near the exhaust and you can easily get to it to inspect the filter and run minimal flexible fuel lines. If there is an issue with the pump, you can easily get to and and no Rube Goldberg arcs with the fuel line to kink to try to hit the fuel line opening in the tunnel. Mount it with some rivnuts and the stock threaded bushings. Did a thread on it many many moons ago. Good luck...you did ask for advice. Comments appreciated. In my previous life episode with 914s I tried to get both a street car and race car to work with fuel pumps in the engine compartment (stock location and elsewhere), and never had 100% success. In both cars I ended up with the pump up front, which also makes sense (to me) as pushing the longest distance instead of "pulling", more like relying on gravity. |
iankarr |
![]()
Post
#29
|
The wrencher formerly known as Cuddy_K ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,556 Joined: 22-May 15 From: Heber City, UT Member No.: 18,749 Region Association: Intermountain Region ![]() ![]() |
Looks like a great spot. Only thing I’m curious about is whether the lines will kink since they’re making a sharp turn in a limited space. I guess you can always get around that by coiling a longer length. Great work as always...
|
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#30
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,264 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
Looks like a great spot. Only thing I’m curious about is whether the lines will kink since they’re making a sharp turn in a limited space. I guess you can always get around that by coiling a longer length. Great work as always... Under the rack requires more coiling of the flex line then under the tank. The problem with under the tank is just that....It's under the tank. It only took me taking the tank out two times and I never wanted to do it again. The other thing about cutting more holes in that area is...unless there is a cover...is that area creates a structural diaphram for the front end. In my engineer mind....I don't like that idea. As far as the OP comments about pushing fuel instead of pulling it....the engineers designed that loop for the fuel induction it was using. So.....if you are using different induction then the fuel loop matters as does the type of pump yuo are using. I would NOT put the pump up front without replacing the tunnel lines with SS or steel lines at the very least. |
ClayPerrine |
![]()
Post
#31
|
Life's been good to me so far..... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 16,316 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille ![]() ![]() |
I have mounted 914 fuel pumps in the location shown in the first picture. It works great. And unless it is full, I can have the tank out in 15 minutes. Only problem I had with putting it there was kinking a suction hose.
I also use an Airtex pump for the factory Fuel Injection. Never had a failure yet. Clay |
914_teener |
![]()
Post
#32
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,264 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
I have mounted 914 fuel pumps in the location shown in the first picture. It works great. And unless it is full, I can have the tank out in 15 minutes. Only problem I had with putting it there was kinking a suction hose. I also use an Airtex pump for the factory Fuel Injection. Never had a failure yet. Clay Yep...I agree...works fine: 1. So long as you know while you are putting it in and unless you are doing it with two people to assure yourself that you are not kinking the line and unless you've drained the tank...it works great. Like I said..consider the fuel pump you are using and the lines. |
bkrantz |
![]()
Post
#33
|
914 Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,361 Joined: 3-August 19 From: SW Colorado Member No.: 23,343 Region Association: Rocky Mountains ![]() ![]() |
Looks like a great spot. Only thing I’m curious about is whether the lines will kink since they’re making a sharp turn in a limited space. I guess you can always get around that by coiling a longer length. Great work as always... Under the rack requires more coiling of the flex line then under the tank. The problem with under the tank is just that....It's under the tank. It only took me taking the tank out two times and I never wanted to do it again. The other thing about cutting more holes in that area is...unless there is a cover...is that area creates a structural diaphram for the front end. In my engineer mind....I don't like that idea. As far as the OP comments about pushing fuel instead of pulling it....the engineers designed that loop for the fuel induction it was using. So.....if you are using different induction then the fuel loop matters as does the type of pump yuo are using. I would NOT put the pump up front without replacing the tunnel lines with SS or steel lines at the very least. Thanks. I agree about cutting more holes in any original design, but in this case I am not too worried about a new 1/2 inch hole. And yes, I have replaced the tunnel lines with SS tubing. |
Highland |
![]()
Post
#34
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 542 Joined: 8-August 11 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 13,418 Region Association: Southern California ![]() |
I think if you take a look at the later model cars, there is a cut out of the front wall at the tank, with a stock cover that may suit your needs better. I mounted mine in the front trunk on the passenger side to provide simple access to change filter elements. Is this location above the bottom of the tank pick-up? Could this cause a problem if you're running near empty? |
robkammer |
![]()
Post
#35
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 7-January 21 From: Vermilion Ohio Member No.: 25,049 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Those are some great shots of pump relo's. I'm just getting into my new BB and found that the pump relo looks pretty sketchy. I have a lot of other things to address first but will get to the pump reset before too long. As things sometime happen, I've only driven the car around my shop building and not on the road. Have the brakes out and off to PMB for rebuild and a cryoclean guy coming out this week to give it a bottom cleaning.
My fuel pump is below the tank, next to the master cylinder, I've attached a pic. IMO it's got way too much going on with lines and wires and zip ties for me to be confident of the install. The electrical feed is coming from below the engine compartment through the tunnel. I need to at least redo the connectors. Is there a better way to power the pump? Thank for any input. Attached image(s) ![]() ![]() |
robkammer |
![]()
Post
#36
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 217 Joined: 7-January 21 From: Vermilion Ohio Member No.: 25,049 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Thanks everyone! Great feedback and good pics too. At this point I'm going to tie it back up right where is is just so I can drive the car once I have brakes back in. PMB has the calipers now. The pump is mounted with rubber mounts that seem to be through bolted into the passenger compartment. So it mounted well, just messy.I dropped the pum and filter to allow access for the Cryocleaning guy, and the air pressure popped the wires off the pump. Fortunately I had taken a picture beforehand that clearly shows how they were attached.
Just to be sure I checked continuity to the wires I assumed were feeding the pump and they are. However, two things have me wondering: when disconnected to the pump, both leads show continuity to ground. So then I checked Haynes, in the drawing the wire that leads to the grounding post is the wire that was connected up front to the pump post that is called out as + in the drawing a few pages back in the manual. I don't currently have a battery installed but will put the old battery in just to confirm which is truly the hot lead. That leads to another question: does it matter which terminal gets the positive and ground? I've always believed a dc motor will run in reverse if the polarity is reversed. Don't think reverse would let it run very well. And one more question: The square filter is pretty bulky, what other filters are folks using that will help tidy this mess up and at the next installation? Thanks again everyone. ![]() |
rgalla9146 |
![]()
Post
#37
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,743 Joined: 23-November 05 From: Paramus NJ Member No.: 5,176 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
I do know about the stock 75-76 location on the left side, but I prefer not to cut an access hole in the bulkhead. With my proposed location, I might be able to remove the pump through the existing big round hole. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) That can be removed easily if both fasteners are through the big hole panel. Move it down a bit. Include enough hose to allow it to be removed through the hole with hoses attached. I did it that way. |
rhodyguy |
![]()
Post
#38
|
Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 22,240 Joined: 2-March 03 From: Orion's Bell. The BELL! Member No.: 378 Region Association: Galt's Gulch ![]() |
Any sort of service, like changing the filter, results in a fuel bath. That plenty of room gets smaller when working from below. Pulling fuel lines one handed thru the hole is one thing. Getting them back on is another. Working blind. I never found pulling a drained tank that much of a hassle. Let line coil naturally and lay in the bottom. Long enough to access the clamps by raising the tank.
|
Van B |
![]()
Post
#39
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,621 Joined: 20-October 21 From: WR, GA Member No.: 26,011 Region Association: None ![]() ![]() |
Reviving this thread because it comes up in search results.
Is anyone reproducing the late model cover and bracket setup? @914werke has been out of stock on his covers for a while. But I also don’t see any brackets around. Before I start cutting and welding, I want to be sure theres not a ready made option out there. |
FJ1200 |
![]()
Post
#40
|
Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 26-December 18 From: Harpswell, ME Member No.: 22,751 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th May 2025 - 08:51 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |