Needed: stock 1.7 dyno graph, for benchmarking my tuning |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Needed: stock 1.7 dyno graph, for benchmarking my tuning |
airsix |
Jul 22 2003, 12:57 PM
Post
#1
|
I have bees in my epiglotis Group: Members Posts: 2,196 Joined: 7-February 03 From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State) Member No.: 266 |
Ha! Does anyone have dyno graphs for the mighty 1.7? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol3.gif)
I am looking for some benchmarks to compare against my PEFI tuning. I know my peak power is good, but I want to make sure I'm getting max torque across the full range. Thanks in advance. Please withhold all 1.7 jokes. I have class-restriction reasons for keeping it (for now). -Ben M. |
airsix |
Jul 25 2003, 03:58 PM
Post
#2
|
I have bees in my epiglotis Group: Members Posts: 2,196 Joined: 7-February 03 From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State) Member No.: 266 |
Come on, throw me a bone!
More questions: Were all the '73 1.7's rated at 72hp or were non-CA cars different? To assist with my PEFI tuning I'm using a narrow-band O2 (to get roughted in)and Home Dyno. I pulled a standard-atmosphere/temp corrected 60hp at the wheels last night. 15% powertrain loss puts me at 70.5hp at the crank. Not to far off the factory 72hp assuming that's the correct figure for a non-CA '73 1.7. Dave Hunt got 80hp on his 2.0 dyno pulls, right? So 10hp drivetrain loss sounds good. I know, I know. "Who gives a flying turd about 1.7's?" Me, 'cuz I owns one. Besides, this is practice for tuning the turbo version and later the 2.7 six. -Ben M. |
Brad Roberts |
Jul 25 2003, 04:12 PM
Post
#3
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 19,148 Joined: 23-December 02 Member No.: 8 Region Association: None |
Your SOL with me. I have nothing on them.
B |
tryan |
Jul 25 2003, 04:25 PM
Post
#4
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 553 Joined: 22-January 03 From: smokey mountains gatlinburg tn Member No.: 184 |
the owners manual should have an hp/torque/rpm curve. got rat milk?
|
garyh |
Jul 25 2003, 04:48 PM
Post
#5
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 8-January 03 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 114 |
QUOTE(airsix @ Jul 25 2003, 01:58 PM) Were all the '73 1.7's rated at 72hp or were non-CA cars different? 49-state cars were advertised as 80 HP. |
Mueller |
Jul 25 2003, 05:20 PM
Post
#6
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
I'd think the factory 2.0 dyno graphs would be close enough, just take into account that the VE of the 1.7 is a few % below that of the 2.0
|
airsix |
Jul 25 2003, 08:48 PM
Post
#7
|
I have bees in my epiglotis Group: Members Posts: 2,196 Joined: 7-February 03 From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State) Member No.: 266 |
For any of you tinkering with stuff like this I highly recommend this home-dyno software. It's pretty cool. Here's my graph from last night. Notice how wild the torque curve is. I'll be working on that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Anyway, my point is this really sheds some light on things. I can clearly see what RPM points need mixture adjustment. I'll see what I can do this weekend and post a followup. Hopefully I can make that torque curve nice and flat.
-Ben M. Attached image(s) |
Andyrew |
Jul 25 2003, 09:28 PM
Post
#8
|
Spooling.... Please wait Group: Members Posts: 13,376 Joined: 20-January 03 From: Riverbank, Ca Member No.: 172 Region Association: Northern California |
Thats a torqy 1.7! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif).
I would be happy with that on my 2.0! (the tq number, not the hp (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ) |
airsix |
Jul 26 2003, 12:07 AM
Post
#9
|
I have bees in my epiglotis Group: Members Posts: 2,196 Joined: 7-February 03 From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State) Member No.: 266 |
QUOTE(Andyrew @ Jul 25 2003, 07:28 PM) Thats a torqy 1.7! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif). I would be happy with that on my 2.0! (the tq number, not the hp (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ) Well, if 49-state '73 1.7's were 80hp that means I've got another 10hp to go root out. The car is very drivable at this point, but as you can see from the saw-tooth torque curve, the mixture is still all over the place. People aren't kidding when they say you need a dyno and gas analyzer to really do this sort of thing. I don't have any gas analysis, and it's only practical to do one 'home-dyno' run per night since you have to dump the recording to a pc. It's slow, but I'm making progress. -Ben M. |
redshift |
Jul 26 2003, 12:20 AM
Post
#10
|
Bless the Hell out of you! Group: Members Posts: 10,926 Joined: 29-June 03 Member No.: 869 |
A worn 1.7 is anemic, a decent one is a stump puller.
We have tractors, you knew that, right? M |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 01:44 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |