Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Needed: stock 1.7 dyno graph, for benchmarking my tuning
airsix
post Jul 22 2003, 12:57 PM
Post #1


I have bees in my epiglotis
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,196
Joined: 7-February 03
From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State)
Member No.: 266



Ha! Does anyone have dyno graphs for the mighty 1.7? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol3.gif)
I am looking for some benchmarks to compare against my PEFI tuning. I know my peak power is good, but I want to make sure I'm getting max torque across the full range. Thanks in advance. Please withhold all 1.7 jokes. I have class-restriction reasons for keeping it (for now).
-Ben M.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
airsix
post Jul 25 2003, 03:58 PM
Post #2


I have bees in my epiglotis
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,196
Joined: 7-February 03
From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State)
Member No.: 266



Come on, throw me a bone!

More questions:
Were all the '73 1.7's rated at 72hp or were non-CA cars different?

To assist with my PEFI tuning I'm using a narrow-band O2 (to get roughted in)and Home Dyno. I pulled a standard-atmosphere/temp corrected 60hp at the wheels last night. 15% powertrain loss puts me at 70.5hp at the crank. Not to far off the factory 72hp assuming that's the correct figure for a non-CA '73 1.7. Dave Hunt got 80hp on his 2.0 dyno pulls, right? So 10hp drivetrain loss sounds good.

I know, I know. "Who gives a flying turd about 1.7's?" Me, 'cuz I owns one. Besides, this is practice for tuning the turbo version and later the 2.7 six.

-Ben M.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Jul 25 2003, 04:12 PM
Post #3


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Your SOL with me. I have nothing on them.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tryan
post Jul 25 2003, 04:25 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 553
Joined: 22-January 03
From: smokey mountains gatlinburg tn
Member No.: 184



the owners manual should have an hp/torque/rpm curve. got rat milk?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
garyh
post Jul 25 2003, 04:48 PM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 170
Joined: 8-January 03
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 114



QUOTE(airsix @ Jul 25 2003, 01:58 PM)
Were all the '73 1.7's rated at 72hp or were non-CA cars different?

49-state cars were advertised as 80 HP.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jul 25 2003, 05:20 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



I'd think the factory 2.0 dyno graphs would be close enough, just take into account that the VE of the 1.7 is a few % below that of the 2.0
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
airsix
post Jul 25 2003, 08:48 PM
Post #7


I have bees in my epiglotis
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,196
Joined: 7-February 03
From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State)
Member No.: 266



For any of you tinkering with stuff like this I highly recommend this home-dyno software. It's pretty cool. Here's my graph from last night. Notice how wild the torque curve is. I'll be working on that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Anyway, my point is this really sheds some light on things. I can clearly see what RPM points need mixture adjustment. I'll see what I can do this weekend and post a followup. Hopefully I can make that torque curve nice and flat.
-Ben M.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Jul 25 2003, 09:28 PM
Post #8


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Thats a torqy 1.7! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif).
I would be happy with that on my 2.0! (the tq number, not the hp (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) )
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
airsix
post Jul 26 2003, 12:07 AM
Post #9


I have bees in my epiglotis
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,196
Joined: 7-February 03
From: Kennewick Man (E. WA State)
Member No.: 266



QUOTE(Andyrew @ Jul 25 2003, 07:28 PM)
Thats a torqy 1.7! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif).
I would be happy with that on my 2.0! (the tq number, not the hp (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) )

Well, if 49-state '73 1.7's were 80hp that means I've got another 10hp to go root out. The car is very drivable at this point, but as you can see from the saw-tooth torque curve, the mixture is still all over the place. People aren't kidding when they say you need a dyno and gas analyzer to really do this sort of thing. I don't have any gas analysis, and it's only practical to do one 'home-dyno' run per night since you have to dump the recording to a pc. It's slow, but I'm making progress.

-Ben M.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jul 26 2003, 12:20 AM
Post #10


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



A worn 1.7 is anemic, a decent one is a stump puller.

We have tractors, you knew that, right?




M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th May 2024 - 01:44 PM