Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Sealing nuts, source
930cabman
post Dec 1 2021, 05:29 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,071
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



We are building a basic 2056 with a mild cam, nothing fancy. Is there a source for the sealing nuts that tie the crankcase together?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
bkrantz
post Dec 1 2021, 08:10 PM
Post #2


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,768
Joined: 3-August 19
From: SW Colorado
Member No.: 23,343
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Not to start an argument, but the original design relies on case sealant around the bolt holes where the case halves meet--no sealing nuts. Though plenty of people use sealant on the stock washers and nuts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
930cabman
post Dec 2 2021, 05:52 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,071
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(bkrantz @ Dec 1 2021, 09:10 PM) *

Not to start an argument, but the original design relies on case sealant around the bolt holes where the case halves meet--no sealing nuts. Though plenty of people use sealant on the stock washers and nuts.


"Sorry Mam, just the facts", thanks Bob, a sealing nut should not be required here, I will probably use a bit of silicone under the bolt head and under the nut heads.
Information is always a good thing
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Superhawk996
post Dec 2 2021, 06:46 AM
Post #4


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,835
Joined: 25-August 18
From: Woods of N. Idaho
Member No.: 22,428
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



QUOTE(930cabman @ Dec 2 2021, 06:52 AM) *

QUOTE(bkrantz @ Dec 1 2021, 09:10 PM) *

Not to start an argument, but the original design relies on case sealant around the bolt holes where the case halves meet--no sealing nuts. Though plenty of people use sealant on the stock washers and nuts.


"Sorry Mam, just the facts", thanks Bob, a sealing nut should not be required here, I will probably use a bit of silicone under the bolt head and under the nut heads.
Information is always a good thing


@930cabman

To continue the argument, bkrantz is correct.

Adding silicone under the bolt head or washer is a very bad plan with respect to proper bolted joint design and ability to hold proper torque (i.e. clamp load) over time.

One of two things happens:
1) A hydraulic film is developed that basically floats the washer. You achieve torque and then the film creeps out over time and you lose torque and respective clamp load. I.e. a soft joint.

2) No hydraulic film is developed and all the sealant is squished out and you end up with a metal to metal hard joint. In this case the sealant was simply wasted and not needed in the first place.

If I were going to use anything it would be a steel sealing washer with an embedded o-ring seal (link below). However, if this were necessary, it would have been used in the 1st place by the engine designers.

https://www.anhosefittings.com/dowty-bonded...AiABEgKw2vD_BwE

At least in this case, the o-ring crushes, you get a hard joint contact around the permimeter of the washer and less chance of clamp load loss over time. But, these sealing washers are notorious for slowly creeping too and wouldn't be ideal for case sealing where you never want to lose clamp load across the case parting line and the associated critical bearing crush and resisting "pounding" load from the crank.

A vertically split case half (914, 911, and lots of motorcycles) is bad enough from a leak failure mode perspective. The other tendency is to overuse the case sealant itself (again - don't ever use Silicone!) and have the same two problems stated above w.r.t. sealant creep. I'm not sure I want to throw down on the best sealant for the case. That is whole different debate but definately DO NOT use silicone to seal the case or put under case bolt nuts or case washers.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Dec 2 2021, 11:17 AM
Post #5


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(Superhawk996 @ Dec 2 2021, 07:46 AM) *

QUOTE(930cabman @ Dec 2 2021, 06:52 AM) *

QUOTE(bkrantz @ Dec 1 2021, 09:10 PM) *

Not to start an argument, but the original design relies on case sealant around the bolt holes where the case halves meet--no sealing nuts. Though plenty of people use sealant on the stock washers and nuts.


"Sorry Mam, just the facts", thanks Bob, a sealing nut should not be required here, I will probably use a bit of silicone under the bolt head and under the nut heads.
Information is always a good thing


@930cabman

To continue the argument, bkrantz is correct.

Adding silicone under the bolt head or washer is a very bad plan with respect to proper bolted joint design and ability to hold proper torque (i.e. clamp load) over time.

One of two things happens:
1) A hydraulic film is developed that basically floats the washer. You achieve torque and then the film creeps out over time and you lose torque and respective clamp load. I.e. a soft joint.

2) No hydraulic film is developed and all the sealant is squished out and you end up with a metal to metal hard joint. In this case the sealant was simply wasted and not needed in the first place.

If I were going to use anything it would be a steel sealing washer with an embedded o-ring seal (link below). However, if this were necessary, it would have been used in the 1st place by the engine designers.

https://www.anhosefittings.com/dowty-bonded...AiABEgKw2vD_BwE

At least in this case, the o-ring crushes, you get a hard joint contact around the permimeter of the washer and less chance of clamp load loss over time. But, these sealing washers are notorious for slowly creeping too and wouldn't be ideal for case sealing where you never want to lose clamp load across the case parting line and the associated critical bearing crush and resisting "pounding" load from the crank.

A vertically split case half (914, 911, and lots of motorcycles) is bad enough from a leak failure mode perspective. The other tendency is to overuse the case sealant itself (again - don't ever use Silicone!) and have the same two problems stated above w.r.t. sealant creep. I'm not sure I want to throw down on the best sealant for the case. That is whole different debate but definately DO NOT use silicone to seal the case or put under case bolt nuts or case washers.


I don't agree.
I use loctite SI 5900, which is spec. on Porsche 996/997 (etc) engines, and have had no problems with it. I've even sealed a T4 case with it and no issues so far. Where it also excels is with ease of clean up if you ever have to take things back apart. Also any squeeze out stays put as it's not affected by oil or gas, so no worms. Way easier to clean up than threebond and here Yamabond has been on BO for over a year.
BTW both threebond and Yamabond are RTV. In fact many modern case sealants are RTV based. Go ahead and name your favorite sealant, unless it's oldschool permatex avation it's likely an RTV based sealant.

Loctite SI 5900 isn't something you can get from your local FLAPs and is a lot more expensive than common RTV. Here it's about $70 for the 300ml tube. You can special order it from a loctite dealer and most WC Porsche shops carry the small 50ml tubes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 04:24 PM