Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How hard would it be, and what's involved?, Retrofitting 75/76 engine to 73/74 specs
Carlitos Way
post Aug 25 2005, 06:37 PM
Post #1


I did it MY WAY
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,337
Joined: 14-September 04
From: Simi Valley, CA
Member No.: 2,757
Region Association: Southern California



Well, I may have an angle on a 75 (stock, CA) engine coming my way. Wondering if this might be the best solution for me. I believe the 75 has more smog crap and stuff, which results in lower performance.

What can I do to "restore" it to a 73/74 condition/power?

As always, your input is greatly appreciated.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Aug 25 2005, 06:51 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE (Carlitos Way @ Aug 25 2005, 05:37 PM)
Well, I may have an angle on a 75 (stock, CA) engine coming my way. Wondering if this might be the best solution for me. I believe the 75 has more smog crap and stuff, which results in lower performance.

What can I do to "restore" it to a 73/74 condition/power?

As always, your input is greatly appreciated.

cheapest and easiest is to keep the early exhaust, the smog stuff doesn't really affect the motor in a bad way, it's the lower compression and cr@ppy design '75/'76 exhaust that hurts it the most.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Aug 25 2005, 07:03 PM
Post #3


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



Remove the external smog equipment and the exhaust. Install your earlier exhaust, plug the air injectors by welding or brazing them up. Even better, find 4 caps of the proper thread and screw 'em on! Most people working on these don't seem to realize that the air injectors seal at that ring half way down the tube, and just threading in a valve adjuster or bolt just isn't the right way to do it. Do it right, do it once .........
The air pump drive is probably broken anyway, and the EGR doesn't really need to be there with earlier FI, which runs richer. One thing you need to think about is head breather fittings. You can drill and tap the heads for some screw-in tubes, especially if the tin is off. Watch out for shavings and chips going into the rocker area. You'll probably want an earlier PCV equipped oil filler/breather box, too. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Aug 25 2005, 07:30 PM
Post #4


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,035
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE (Mueller @ Aug 25 2005, 05:51 PM)
QUOTE (Carlitos Way @ Aug 25 2005, 05:37 PM)
Well, I may have an angle on a 75 (stock, CA) engine coming my way.  Wondering if this might be the best solution for me.  I believe the 75 has more smog crap and stuff, which results in lower performance.

What can I do to "restore" it to a 73/74 condition/power?

As always, your input is greatly appreciated.

cheapest and easiest is to keep the early exhaust, the smog stuff doesn't really affect the motor in a bad way, it's the lower compression and cr@ppy design '75/'76 exhaust that hurts it the most.

Its the same compression as the 73/74 2.0l motors if you are talking about 2.0L's.

Now if you are talking about 1.8l's I still think they are the same.

Capt Krusty said it all. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Carlitos Way
post Aug 26 2005, 10:58 AM
Post #5


I did it MY WAY
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,337
Joined: 14-September 04
From: Simi Valley, CA
Member No.: 2,757
Region Association: Southern California



So... would I in fact get close to the 95 ponies on my 74 if I took a 75 and "plugged it in" or am I going to go down to about 75?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Aug 26 2005, 11:06 AM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE (Carlitos Way @ Aug 26 2005, 09:58 AM)
So... would I in fact get close to the 95 ponies on my 74 if I took a 75 and "plugged it in" or am I going to go down to about 75?

Hey Geoff, not sure why I thought the compression was different...my bad (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)


If the rest of the internals of the motor are the same year to year, then with the better '74 exhaust, you should have the same HP as you would with the correct '74 motor.....




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Aug 26 2005, 11:07 AM
Post #7


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



depends on the engine....

my 1.7 has way more power than my worn-out 2.0
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Aug 26 2005, 12:10 PM
Post #8


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE (Mueller @ Aug 26 2005, 10:06 AM)
QUOTE (Carlitos Way @ Aug 26 2005, 09:58 AM)
So...  would I in fact get close to the 95 ponies on my 74 if I took a 75 and "plugged it in" or am I going to go down to about 75?

Hey Geoff, not sure why I thought the compression was different...my bad (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)


If the rest of the internals of the motor are the same year to year, then with the better '74 exhaust, you should have the same HP as you would with the correct '74 motor.....

the void in the exhaust port from the air injection limits flow.....how much? i dunno...

but i can wager that it doesnt *quite* flow as good as a 73-74 head (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif)

just my 2 cents...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RustyWa
post Aug 26 2005, 02:09 PM
Post #9


Working Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 610
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Kent, WA
Member No.: 72



QUOTE (Cap'n Krusty @ Aug 25 2005, 06:03 PM)
One thing you need to think about is head breather fittings.  You can drill and tap the heads for some screw-in tubes, especially if the tin is off.  Watch out for shavings and chips going into the rocker area.

Cap'n,

Why didn't the '75/'76 cars come with the head breather fittings? Why do you think it is necessary to add them?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Aug 26 2005, 04:13 PM
Post #10


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



I went the same route you're going with mine.

Started with a '76 fully smogged motor, threw away all the emissions stuff, plugged the injection ports, installed euro P/C's, backdated the exhaust and put in a mild cam.

Stock D-Jet fed and it runs really well.

At least better than Aaron or Miles cars. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th June 2024 - 07:20 PM