Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Production Report, Better Than COA
wonkipop
post Jun 26 2025, 06:31 PM
Post #21


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,809
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



@davep @JeffBowlsby

prompted by mr. b's question about specific codes for USA Calif emissions i went back and looked at my files where i had put the California Clean Air Resources Board emissions certification. as posted earlier there is no difference in the engines USA wide and california for the 2.0s.

but.....i took a look at something closely i had not really looked at before which is the documents porsche submitted for the 911 and 914/6 in 1973 which i had downloaded at the time i got the 914/4 and VW stuff a few years ago.

there is a very surprising bit of info i had not noticed before.
the 911 and 914/6 material is submitted and filed separately on the CARB archives and was not submitted by VW of North America. Porsche AG germany directly submitted for those models.

.....and we are talking about the 73 model year. when the 914/6 was discontinued.
take a look.

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image

porsche submit for approval a 914/6 model with the 2.4 L MFI engine as fitted to all the 911ss for that model year. documentation is dated sept 72
its not a continuance of the 70-72 914/6 which had a 2 L carb engine.
at the same time VW of NA submitted CARB certification for the 914/4 (914-1.7) and the 914S (914-2.0) which covered the discontinuance of the 914/6 2L and its replacement by the 914/4 2.0.

is this approval for the 916? which they cancelled shortly afterward or right about then.

stuff you find! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Jun 26 2025, 09:28 PM
Post #22


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,289
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



Indeed, the stuff you find! They were prepared to continue with the 914/6; and with all three current engine levels. This would have been unprecedented. The original 914/6 had a detuned 2.0 engine so as not to compete with the 2.2 engine 911 series. A 914/6 2.4S could have compared favorably with the 911RS.
Now, the first few 916 did have the 2.4S while the majority got the 2.7RS engine. The Factory knew well before these papers were prepared what the 914/6 2.4 was capable off, and they knew the horrendously poor sales of the 1971 and 1972 914/6 2.0. It really does boggle my mind as to why the models were submitted.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th July 2025 - 05:34 AM