Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1.8 is out... 2056 is in and it runs!, It's a runner! Wahhooo!
wonkipop
post Jun 21 2026, 05:45 PM
Post #101


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,572
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



@TRP
yes the 74 has both of the air passage hoses the same. 9mm ID.

and according to info i found, for 75, in PET the inlet hose from the intake boot is 18mm ID ( (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) ) and the outlet to intake distributor plenum is 14mm. which must mean that on a 75 the intake distributor plenum has a larger port tube for that hose to attach to.

9mm OD on a 74 and 14mm OD on a 75. ????
i've never seen an intact 75 L jet down here so i can only go off PET info.

i'm going to guess the reason for the bigger diam hoses in 75 was to slow down the decel process for a more complete burn on throttle closure to further reduce dump of unburned hydrocarbons. i have a feeling the 74 decel would work ok, would give a quicker decel maybe but i don't see why it would not work. the only thing might be you would need to do some kind of hose step up / sleeve arrangement to connect the smaller diam hose to the distributor plenum with its bigger port tube.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

6 Pages V « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic
11 User(s) are reading this topic (11 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd June 2026 - 04:22 AM
...