Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Who is to blame? (Way off Topic), Man dies running from Police
Who's fault is it the man died?
Who's fault is it the man died?
The Police [ 7 ] ** [11.86%]
The offender [ 47 ] ** [79.66%]
Not Sure [ 5 ] ** [8.47%]
Total Votes: 59
  
Part Pricer
post Aug 19 2003, 08:45 AM
Post #21


Believe everything I post
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,825
Joined: 28-December 02
From: Danbury, CT
Member No.: 35



QUOTE(Lawrence @ Aug 19 2003, 09:40 AM)
You pushed the wrong button?

Lemme look and see what I can find... I don't want to reset the whole poll.

What vote did you cast, and what did you mean to cast?

I hit the null vote button instead of the vote button.

I wanted to vote that the cops were culpable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lawrence
post Aug 19 2003, 08:53 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,661
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 244
Region Association: None



Hey Paul,

I don't see a simple answer to do that... and rather than screw up the databases and crash the BBS, I'm going to err on the side of caution and not touch it.

Sorry,
Rusty (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Curvie Roadlover
post Aug 19 2003, 09:06 AM
Post #23


Two trunks are better than one!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,025
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 42



QUOTE(vortrex @ Aug 19 2003, 06:43 AM)
QUOTE(Curvie Roadlover @ Aug 19 2003, 06:36 AM)
QUOTE(Paul Heery @ Aug 19 2003, 06:28 AM)

I think that you have to consider that police officers are responsible for the safety of an individual once they are in custody. This guy may have not had cuffs on or had been arrested. But, he had been given a blood alcohol test so he was clearly in police custody.

The guy bolted and dove in a lake. Was he a danger to the public or the police officers? Probably not. I would almost guarantee that the officers made sure that he wasn’t carrying any weapons prior to giving him the blood alcohol test.

It may not be popular and is contrary to my personal beliefs, but the officers involved were negligent in their duties. They were responsible for the safety of the individual and they were responsible for controlling the suspect.


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
I'm sure there is shared responsibility here inthis young mans' death, the police and his own. Only those there know the truth. Running from the police, IMHO is very likely to get you roughed up and probably deservedly so. But not killed! And I'm talking about physically running, as in- on your feet. Running in a car puts innocent lives at risk. That's a whole different thing.

running from the cops or not, it's not like they threw him into the water. the results here are totally the result of the kids actions.

0. criminal history

1. breaking the law

2. running from the law

3. jumping into a lake

So, for that, a 17 year old boy deserves to die??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Curvie Roadlover
post Aug 19 2003, 09:09 AM
Post #24


Two trunks are better than one!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,025
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 42



If they could have prevented his death, but stood by instead because they felt he was getting what he deserved, then they are responsible for his death.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pnambic
post Aug 19 2003, 09:09 AM
Post #25


Honk if you like obscene gestures!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 914
Joined: 9-April 03
From: Atlanta, GA
Member No.: 546
Region Association: South East States



I think Paul is right on in this one IF once they give you the breathalizer, you are technically in police custody. I don't know on that. But if the kid was in custody, they are responsible for keeping him from harming others as well as himself. That means that if he is in the back of the squad car and he starts banging his head on the window, the cops are required to get him to stop (tie him down, drug him, whatever (not shoot him)).

The real question here is whether or not the cops knew he was in the water and if so, could they see him and if so, could they get to him in time to save him. If so, they were obligated to at least try. It may suck, but its a dirty job and somebody has to do it.

I don't know if anyone here has jumped into a lake or other body of water to save someone that was drowning, but even someone who isn't running from the law, when drowning, is extremely dangerous....thrashing around....they could easily injure or even drown a person that was trying to save them.

Add to that the murky water and it was 4 a.m. and the chances that the police were able to see where he was or notice a small boat that was reportedly nearby become pretty remote.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Aug 19 2003, 09:14 AM
Post #26


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,300
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



QUOTE
There should be a law: "Run from police and they are allowed to beat the living s__t out of you."



I am an OKlahoma Self Defense Act Instructor. I teach a class that is required to apply for your concealed carry permit. One of the main things we stress is "reasonable use of of deadly force" We have the right to defend ourselves from threat of bodily harm, by any means necessary, including the use of deadly force. The right to defend ourselves ceases once the threat has been negated. The police have the same rights and responsibilities. Simply running away, for whatever reason, does not pose a threat and is not justification for use of deadly force. Giving the police that power would be Gestapo tactics!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
alphacrimedog
post Aug 19 2003, 09:49 AM
Post #27


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 27-June 03
From: Columbus, GA
Member No.: 868



Looking at the results of the poll just affirms my thoughts that 914 people are pretty smart people. Shoulda, coulda, woulda........My question is who said that the Police just stood around and watched while the suspect repeatedly cried for help? I doubt the Police said that. Its the scum-sucking, trying to get a check lawyer. The sign said "no swimming". My guess is it was there for a reason. It would have been nice if the suspect would have done what the Police asked him to. He'd still be alive. He gambled and lost.They should have used a boat? Give me a break.

As a police officer for 22 years I can tell you that sh*t does happen. One time on midnight watch we had suspect take off running at the sight of a Police car who was checking businesses late one night. The stupid fool took off running across a bridge over the Chattahoochee River which seperates Georgia from Alabama. The bridge is about 80 feet above the water. Well this fool makes it about 3/4ths of the way across with the police officer giving chase behind him. All of the sudden he decides to take a nose dive over the side of the bridge into the river. They found his body about 3 hours later, his head stuck in the muddy river bottom up to his shoulders. We never knew why he ran or jumped. Anyway about his jumping from the bridge.....I'd have to give him a 9.5 on style and a 9.0 on difficulty factor. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/finger.gif)

Once you are in custody the Police are supposed to protect you. This is true. But at the point in time he ESCAPED POLICE CUSTODY. its all on him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lawrence
post Aug 19 2003, 09:49 AM
Post #28


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,661
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 244
Region Association: None



QUOTE
We have the right to defend ourselves from threat of bodily harm, by any means necessary, including the use of deadly force. The right to defend ourselves ceases once the threat has been negated. The police have the same rights and responsibilities. Simply running away, for whatever reason, does not pose a threat and is not justification for use of deadly force. Giving the police that power would be Gestapo tactics!


Well said. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/clap56.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vortrex
post Aug 19 2003, 09:53 AM
Post #29


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,687
Joined: 24-December 02
From: SF, CA
Member No.: 4
Region Association: None



running away very often poses a threat. how many times have you seen or heard of criminals fleeing the seen on foot and hijacking a motorist? how about when they then mow over someone or hit another car while trying to escape?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lawrence
post Aug 19 2003, 09:54 AM
Post #30


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,661
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 244
Region Association: None



And once a fleeing poses a clear and immediate threat to the life of another - then deadly force should be used. But NOT before.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vortrex
post Aug 19 2003, 09:57 AM
Post #31


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,687
Joined: 24-December 02
From: SF, CA
Member No.: 4
Region Association: None



what deadly force was used by these cops? I see no evidence of force.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Aug 19 2003, 10:00 AM
Post #32


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



strike 1) he shouldn't have ran...

strike 2) under-age+drunk+driving

strike 3) don't be dumb enough to jump in the water if you can't swim

I HIGHLY doubt the police stood idley by and watched him drown. more likely that they didn't see him until it was too late, if at all...

I feel bad for the guy, but I think our little swimmer here is in the wrong.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lawrence
post Aug 19 2003, 10:02 AM
Post #33


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,661
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 244
Region Association: None



From the story I read, there was no deadly force used. Running away and jumping into a lake isn't threatening someone else's life. Hence, no deadly force.

However, according to your proposal, the cops should have shot him in the water, for running away.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
seanery
post Aug 19 2003, 10:07 AM
Post #34


waiting to rebuild whitey!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 15,852
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Indy
Member No.: 100
Region Association: None



I think alphacrimedog nailed it.

"He escaped Police custody."

If a guy breaks out of jail and is hit by a car, who's to blame?
Same situation (basically) to me.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vortrex
post Aug 19 2003, 10:08 AM
Post #35


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,687
Joined: 24-December 02
From: SF, CA
Member No.: 4
Region Association: None



personally, I see nothing wrong with shooting him. again, I don't have to fear being shot because I'm surely smart enough to not run from a bunch of cops with handcuffs, clubs, guns, and dogs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Steve Thacker
post Aug 19 2003, 10:13 AM
Post #36


UMMMPH Yea Baby Yea ! UMMMPH
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,089
Joined: 8-January 03
From: Pickerington, Ohio
Member No.: 113
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(vortrex @ Aug 19 2003, 10:20 AM)
rockaria sounds like our smartest forum member.

police should have the license to kill ANYONE who runs from them, armed or not.


Vortex am I reading you right or are you on crack? Lets just have Nazi Germany all over again huh?! Lets just give the cops the ability to shoot a unarmed person....Geez

I'm with Lawrence. The authorities in this country are way off the chart as far as unchecked powers. Our liberties are few and dwindling down everyday, because people are just handing them to the govt because they are weak and don't want to deal with things.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"---Ben Franklin

The police have a job and I'm sure they did theirs that night. The idiot drowned due to his own bad choice. Life is about choices, good and bad.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Curvie Roadlover
post Aug 19 2003, 10:14 AM
Post #37


Two trunks are better than one!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,025
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 42



QUOTE(vortrex @ Aug 19 2003, 08:08 AM)
personally, I see nothing wrong with shooting him. again, I don't have to fear being shot because I'm surely smart enough to not run from a bunch of cops with handcuffs, clubs, guns, and dogs.

Are you in the funeral business?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lawrence
post Aug 19 2003, 10:14 AM
Post #38


Senior Member
***

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 1,661
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 244
Region Association: None



I believe that giving the police, or any level of law enforcement, that much life-or-death power is just asking to move towards a police state and destroy the freedoms that our country is based on.

So, I think we should agree to disagree.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vortrex
post Aug 19 2003, 10:18 AM
Post #39


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,687
Joined: 24-December 02
From: SF, CA
Member No.: 4
Region Association: None



honestly I would rather have a police state and less crime, but that's just me. to me, there is no freedom to commit crimes.

hey send the paypal for those seals! I am going to ship stuff tomorrow, ONCE.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rockaria
post Aug 19 2003, 10:19 AM
Post #40


ZippidyDoDah...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Joined: 2-May 03
From: Southwest, USA
Member No.: 645
Region Association: None



My main point is simple. You can do anything in the world, Anything you want, but each action has a cost to you. We have to accept those costs. We choose to accept them and do what we do. Moral society is degrading at a rate faster than the costs are rising.

Simple: Would you speed if the ticket was $5,000?

Nope!

Would you Drive drunk if the sentance was 10 years in Jail?

Nope!

Would you run from a cop if you knew they could...

Nope!


Simple, The costs just aren't enough. Now I can run from a cop, No matter the situation and sue for any reason. Cool!

We all know that the guy in this story was casuing no harm to anyone but themselves. My points are aimed at all those A__ Wipes we see on that police chase show.

"I ran from the cops and killed a fimily of 5 because I did not want to get caught because I was smoking Dope!" "But now I am suing becasue the cops hurt me!"

WHAT ABOUT THE INNOCENT PEOPLES RIGHTS?

This is a very touchy subject to me...

I know the government can have too much power and we all feel like its a police state, but man, some days I fear for my life. Not from the govermnet or cops, But from people who choose to do what they do and harm innocent lives.

Rant #2 over...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

5 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 02:39 PM