diaphram analysis is in and ......, from RustyWA |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
diaphram analysis is in and ......, from RustyWA |
Bleyseng |
Feb 27 2006, 02:19 PM
Post
#1
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,034 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
You were correct....COPPER.
-------- Ok, did the marterial analysis on the OEM diaphram this morning using a Niton XL-II 800 handheld alloy analyzer. I made three different scans of the sample piece I got from Geoff. The readings were as follows: #1 - 99.78% Cu #2 - 99.20% Cu #3 - 99.39% Cu No berillium. Supposedly anything between 98%-100% copper is considered pure. The remainder of the 100% reading was a spattering of Al, Si Br, Phos Brz. -------------------- Eric '75 914 2.0L |
JeffBowlsby |
Feb 27 2006, 02:36 PM
Post
#2
|
914 Wiring Harnesses Group: Members Posts: 8,509 Joined: 7-January 03 From: San Ramon CA Member No.: 104 Region Association: None |
Pure copper eh? I am surpised that pure copper would be strong enough to withstand the constant fluxuations. Thats good news Eric (and Geoff), copper sheet is readily available.
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smash.gif) Now where is that press.... |
Mueller |
Feb 27 2006, 02:51 PM
Post
#3
|
||
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
I still say it's BeCu......
Add your % findings to the % composition for second type.....
More reading here: Be Cu info |
||
ClayPerrine |
Feb 27 2006, 07:16 PM
Post
#4
|
Life's been good to me so far..... Group: Admin Posts: 15,465 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille |
"Diaphram Analysis"....
That title leaves things wide open for some really low comments..... I am suprised (and a bit disappointed) that no one chose to jump on that! (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) |
lapuwali |
Feb 27 2006, 07:26 PM
Post
#5
|
Not another one! Group: Benefactors Posts: 4,526 Joined: 1-March 04 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 1,743 |
What Mueller said. Alloying elements are sometimes found in astonishingly small percentages, yet can make a huge difference to how the material behaves. Now, it's quite possible one could get a useful diaphram made from nearly pure copper, though I'd be willing to bet it wouldn't work nearly as well over wide temperature ranges, which I believe is what the Be was originally put there for: small thermal expansion coefficient.
|
alpha434 |
Feb 27 2006, 07:30 PM
Post
#6
|
My member number is no coincidence. Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 16-December 05 From: Denver, CO Member No.: 5,280 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
A BeCu alloy usually ranges from 0.25% to 2.00% Be.
This falls within the range that was measured, yeah? |
RustyWa |
Feb 27 2006, 07:30 PM
Post
#7
|
||
Working Member Group: Members Posts: 610 Joined: 2-January 03 From: Kent, WA Member No.: 72 |
That could turn out to be a big bummer. I'll explore the analyzer literature a little more and talk to some other engineers about it. |
||
tdgray |
Feb 27 2006, 07:32 PM
Post
#8
|
Thank God Nemo is not here to see this Group: Members Posts: 9,705 Joined: 5-August 03 From: Akron, OH Member No.: 984 Region Association: None |
I second that respond.
I run a forging operation. If there is one thing I see constantly is the effect of "small" element variations on our work. Take 1045 steel... normal specs call for anthing from 1042 to 1048 to fall within the range of 1045. But, use the variant on some jobs and you will find siginificant problems with flash extension and grain flow. I do not profess to know much about steel chemistry but I do know from mixed steel that certain elements can mimic other compositions. Could this be the case here. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif) |
Mueller |
Feb 27 2006, 07:32 PM
Post
#9
|
||
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
thanks for repeating what I've already posted a few hours ago (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wacko.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/screwy.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) |
||
Katmanken |
Feb 27 2006, 07:34 PM
Post
#10
|
You haven't seen me if anybody asks... Group: Members Posts: 4,738 Joined: 14-June 03 From: USA Member No.: 819 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Did you try Rockwell hardness?
Might ID the material that way.. Ken |
alpha434 |
Feb 27 2006, 07:35 PM
Post
#11
|
My member number is no coincidence. Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 16-December 05 From: Denver, CO Member No.: 5,280 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
And .02% cobalt-nickel used as a stabilizer.
You didn't get and cobalt or nickle, did ya? My bet is that it isn't BeCu. |
tdgray |
Feb 27 2006, 07:39 PM
Post
#12
|
Thank God Nemo is not here to see this Group: Members Posts: 9,705 Joined: 5-August 03 From: Akron, OH Member No.: 984 Region Association: None |
Oh great another bet from the aplha dog... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/dry.gif)
Rockwell IIRC cannot determine chemical composition. Just suggest at it. Same as spark testing etc. |
alpha434 |
Feb 27 2006, 07:41 PM
Post
#13
|
||
My member number is no coincidence. Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 16-December 05 From: Denver, CO Member No.: 5,280 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Yeah. Wanna bet? I KNOW I'm right here. This is my area. I had to write a four page report on Cupric alloys for school. |
||
tdgray |
Feb 27 2006, 07:45 PM
Post
#14
|
Thank God Nemo is not here to see this Group: Members Posts: 9,705 Joined: 5-August 03 From: Akron, OH Member No.: 984 Region Association: None |
Yes I would wanna bet little shaver.
If I give you a raw piece of steel...then you can give me the chemical composition of the steel... Jesus you must be F'in magic. I will hire you as the Chief metalurgist at my plan if you can do that. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/huh.gif) |
alpha434 |
Feb 27 2006, 07:46 PM
Post
#15
|
My member number is no coincidence. Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 16-December 05 From: Denver, CO Member No.: 5,280 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
it's 1080.
And you couldn't afford me. |
alpha434 |
Feb 27 2006, 07:47 PM
Post
#16
|
My member number is no coincidence. Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 16-December 05 From: Denver, CO Member No.: 5,280 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
The initial readings were given at the top of this thread.
If there is no nickel and no cobalt, then it will not be BeCu. |
Katmanken |
Feb 27 2006, 07:51 PM
Post
#17
|
You haven't seen me if anybody asks... Group: Members Posts: 4,738 Joined: 14-June 03 From: USA Member No.: 819 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Ok boys,
I cut and pasted the tester into a search engine and found..... (drumroll please..) The tester used doesn't have Beryllium as a listed material that it can detect- with ANY isotope. Rockwell is a dumb easy practical test that can be used to narrow the materials. Depending on the results, you can eliminate a number of materials and hardnesses. (this one is too soft, this one is too hard, this one is JUST right) Alpha, what are ya gonna do if you have two different Cu materials/treatments that have the same hardness... You won't be able to get alloys by hardness. You can narrow the possibilities but other tests are needed. Ken |
alpha434 |
Feb 27 2006, 07:55 PM
Post
#18
|
My member number is no coincidence. Group: Members Posts: 3,154 Joined: 16-December 05 From: Denver, CO Member No.: 5,280 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
You can usually tell JUST by machinability. BeCu chips are kinda powdery, and its easy to get a good finish. Cu comes off like chewying gum.
You don't have a large enough piiece to machine. You can't chemically test it for fear of realeasing the Be. I dunno! That one's tough. I'll brainstorm. |
Aaron Cox |
Feb 27 2006, 07:57 PM
Post
#19
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
i rockwell tested my hootus... it said it was hard (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif)
|
Mueller |
Feb 27 2006, 07:57 PM
Post
#20
|
||
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
I posted that on the other thread on this subject...the tester "might" be able to find Bu if used in a vac. how much movement does a diaphram see? wouldn't be too hard to just make a fixture to run some sample cycle tests of differing alloys |
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 04:29 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |