Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1800 stroker
bd1308
post Mar 14 2006, 08:27 PM
Post #1


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



is this possible? I mean I would think it wouldnt be IMPOSSIBLE, but i was just looking for a summer project....

Just thinking out loud, dont bash me for not thinking or researching anything. Just extending the britt feelers out there to see who knows what about stroker engines....

Assume this will be ran with aftermarket EFI (megasquirt).

b

edit: actually, assume this will be run with my weber DGEV carb (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif)




(someone get Joe Richard over here, he'll die)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Mar 14 2006, 08:34 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



sure, install a 2.0 crank/rods/pistons and you have a "stroker" engine (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

"most" people increase the bore at the same time...the motor I was building and sold to Mark Henry was a stock bore with a 78mm stroke

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Mar 14 2006, 08:38 PM
Post #3


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



but the 2.0 cylinders wont fit into the 1.8 heads....

I have a set of 2.0 bus heads, but i'm losing that battle....they are a "just in case" item....

i also have 1.7 heads (extra set)...

and if i grab this 1.8 engine i'll have 3/4ths of a 1.8 engine...

i'd liek to be able to use either the 1.7 or the 1.8 heads and then just add some (relative term--I think my 1.7 is fast) power in there until i can get $$ for a raby 4


b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Mar 14 2006, 08:43 PM
Post #4


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



QUOTE (Mueller @ Mar 14 2006, 08:34 PM)
sure, install a 2.0 crank/rods/pistons and you have a "stroker" engine (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

"most" people increase the bore at the same time...the motor I was building and sold to Mark Henry was a stock bore with a 78mm stroke

wow! thats quite a bit more than a stock stroke if I looked correctly.

everything else was stock? Wouldn't there be problems with the valvetrain colliding with the piston somewhere in its travel?

where'd you get the rods to make that 78mm stroke?

b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave Bell
post Mar 14 2006, 08:50 PM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 234
Joined: 27-November 03
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Member No.: 1,398
Region Association: None



Stock 1.8L, 93mm pistons and 2.0 cylinders, 94mm, will fit the 1.8 heads. In fact 96mm cylinders will fit in the 1.8 head... cylinder walls are just thinner.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Mar 14 2006, 08:50 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



think about it:

if you increase your crank stroke, what does it affect?

with the stock rod and piston it would cause the piston to slam into the head, so, you can use a shorter rod or use a piston with a pin height closer to the top of the piston....

2.0 cylinders will fit right into the 1.8 heads and for the 1.7 heads, you just open them up...the cost should be about $50 or so to mill 'em out.....

the cheapest method to build a stroker out of your 1.7/1.8 would to convert it to a 2.0......

maybe I'm wrong, but if it was that easy, we'd see more people doing it....you should contact 914V6 or is that V6914?? he is into building odd ball combo's on the cheap....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Mar 14 2006, 08:55 PM
Post #7


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



SWEET! so just forget the stroker idea altogether??

in my head, some things appear easier than they really are...must be the KY air (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smoke.gif)

anyway, 96mm pistons seem like a GrEaT idea and then use 1.8 heads....

wonder who to ask to see if they have 1.8L heads lying around. I could also get teh 1.7s opened up too....options options.

b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Mar 14 2006, 09:16 PM
Post #8


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Just how does one create an "1800 Stroker"??
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Mar 14 2006, 09:23 PM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE (Jake Raby @ Mar 14 2006, 08:16 PM)
Just how does one create an "1800 Stroker"??

the correct answer would be:

you'd have to start with something "smaller" than 1800cc's (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave Bell
post Mar 14 2006, 09:28 PM
Post #10


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 234
Joined: 27-November 03
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Member No.: 1,398
Region Association: None



Muller beat me...

I guess 71 x 90 is a stroker if you are starting with 66 x 90

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Mar 14 2006, 09:30 PM
Post #11


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



OR stroke an 1800 case to another displacement...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Mar 15 2006, 07:17 AM
Post #12


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



yyyyeah...

I was thinking aloud.

I was going to take a 1800 Case, and make a bigger engine, IE a stroker. But since 96mm pistons fit into 1.8 heads.... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif)

b
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Mar 15 2006, 08:07 AM
Post #13


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE (bd1308 @ Mar 15 2006, 05:17 AM)
yyyyeah...

I was thinking aloud.

I was going to take a 1800 Case, and make a bigger engine, IE a stroker. But since 96mm pistons fit into 1.8 heads.... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif)

b

Remember:
It doesn't matter what the engine WAS!

My 3 Liter is built on the earliest 1.7 liter case I could find that wasn't magnesium!

Also remember that displacement offers no benefits without proper head work, so you could build a 2500 with stock heads and more than likely make LESS usable power than a stock 1800!

It's all in the combo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th May 2024 - 06:42 PM