 MPS: tested, is it good? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| jhadler |
 Apr 7 2006, 12:13 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Long term tinkerer...  Group: Members Posts: 1,879 Joined: 7-April 03 From: Lyons, CO Member No.: 529  |
To all you uber experts:
I dug up three MPS's from the crate and tested them 1) 043 MPS. Lost 6 inches Hg over 5 minutes. Tested at 91 and 338 ohms. 2) 049 MPS. Lost 4 inches Hg over 5 minutes. Tested at 89.7 and 328 ohms. 3) 043 MPS. Would not pull any vacuum, toast. ... So, is #1 any good? If not, can I use the 049 on a 2.0L? Thanks! -Josh2 |
   |
 
|
Posts in this topic
jhadler MPS: tested, is it good? Apr 7 2006, 12:13 AM
bd1308 I would think that not holding all of the vaccuum ... Apr 7 2006, 06:01 AM Jeff Bowlsby #1 and #2 are failing, but probably serviceable, t... Apr 7 2006, 06:22 AM Bleyseng http://www.914world.com/bbs2/h... Apr 7 2006, 07:47 AM jhadler Thanks!
I plan on converting the car to Megas... Apr 7 2006, 08:49 AM jhadler If the leak is slow, I would think that the longer... Apr 7 2006, 03:35 PM Bleyseng NO
At idle the engine vacuum (15hg) will overcome... Apr 7 2006, 05:40 PM
jhadler <... Apr 7 2006, 11:55 PM  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 11:26 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.