Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Drag Coefficient for 1972 914/4?
swatteam2
post May 17 2006, 12:44 AM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 16-May 06
From: California
Member No.: 6,014



Hey Everybody,

My name is Mike and doing an aerodynamics research project at the University of California, San Diego on an advisor's 1972 Porsche 914, involving CFD flow analysis, 1/18 scale model testing in the water tunnel with various aero configurations, as well as full-size coastdown drag testing with those same configurations, etc. My question is - are there any published values for the drag coefficient of this car? I've done a forum search and seen some estimates of .45, although the number seems to have been contested by others. Any help on this would be much appreciated! Thanks,

-Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 17 2006, 12:57 AM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



COOL. Can I come and watch? I live 10min from the school.

Andy has the "Das Grosse" book with all the factory info in German. Let me call him real quick.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
So.Cal.914
post May 17 2006, 12:58 AM
Post #3


"...And it has a front trunk too."
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,588
Joined: 15-February 04
From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J.
Member No.: 1,658
Region Association: None



These are static tests? Reason I ask is my car will drop in the front about 1 1/4" to 1 1/2" at about 90 to 100 mph. I believe this would change those figures. Others have their cars even lower to start with than mine.

Observation. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post May 17 2006, 12:59 AM
Post #4


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



72 914: 0.37 73 is 0.38


B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post May 17 2006, 01:00 AM
Post #5


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,651
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



brad is correct ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Andy


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post May 17 2006, 05:08 AM
Post #6


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



And I imagine any of the other stuff that gets added will drastically effect Cd.
I know the cow catcher air dam and little flippy tail fin slowed the car down quite a bit on top end. Like 10 MPH
I normally run the early wrap under valance and slick trunk lid. windows up.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47
post May 17 2006, 05:38 AM
Post #7


Viermeister
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,254
Joined: 7-August 03
From: Vienna, VA
Member No.: 994
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



i've seen a C chart with different values for lights up, top off, windows up, etc.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd66921
post May 17 2006, 09:13 AM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 316
Joined: 9-January 06
From: Texas
Member No.: 5,394



QUOTE(type47 @ May 17 2006, 04:38 AM) *

i've seen a C chart with different values for lights up, top off, windows up, etc.



Attached File  914_Cd.htm ( 762bytes ) Number of downloads: 179
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post May 17 2006, 09:18 AM
Post #9


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,725
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Brad Roberts @ May 16 2006, 10:59 PM) *

72 914: 0.37 73 is 0.38


B


Must be the tits on the front bumper? I wouldn't think they would make that much diff. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post May 17 2006, 10:16 AM
Post #10


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



Mike- cool project!
No doubt aero efficiency is a major player in gas milleage and top speed, 2 things we all want to improve. If you have any wiggle room in testing the areo efficiency of different 914 mods, I think we would all be interested in more info on the effects of GT flares, rear spoiler/ducktail, stock front air dam vs. LE air dam, lifting the back of the roof, and maybe smoothing out the area under the exhaust/muffler.

Try the "Search" feature in the upper right of the page - lots of 914 mods out there. One really good thread on aero improvements could probably be found by searching "lift and roof"...there are some vortex generator tabs that were attached tot he rear edge of the roof that MIGHT be making a signifcant improvement.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post May 17 2006, 10:21 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



Are you in FSAE down at UCSD?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post May 17 2006, 10:47 AM
Post #12


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



What ever happened to the guy with air tabs on his race car? Was there any benefit from it?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post May 17 2006, 10:54 AM
Post #13


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,651
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(ChrisNPDrider @ May 17 2006, 09:16 AM) *

more info on the effects of GT flares
well, even the 916, the brick with the trashcans hanging off the sides (GT Flares), is still better than the 911 Turbo ...

pretty good for a shoebox with wheels ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif) Andy
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
swatteam2
post May 17 2006, 01:48 PM
Post #14


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 16-May 06
From: California
Member No.: 6,014



Hey, thanks everybody for your responses! For our project, we'll be testing various combinations of the following modifications (both scale model and full-size) - top on/off, windows up/down, an air dam, and 2 sizes of rear spoilers. Unfortunately since our project timespan is only 10 weeks, we'll have to restrict our tests to these modifications and probably won't be able to look into other things like fender flares, etc.

Basically we'll be doing comparative drag testing in the water tunnel (already have previously collected data on lift-coefficient effects of these mods). The water tunnel has a flow velocity limited to about 2 m/s which means that for a 1/18 scale model, we'll only be able to achieve a scaled speed of a few miles per hour. The published values that you have given me will help a lot in seeing if testing at such scaled speeds will still yield reasonable estimates of Cd.

We'll also be doing flow-visualization in the water tunnel using dye lines to validate the CFD flow analysis results and observe any salient aero effects of the various mods.

As far as real car testing, we'll probably head over to the scripp's ranch area (some nice flat stretches of road) for roll down testing to see if the drag trends observed in CFD and water tunnel testing for the various configurations are reproduced in real life. We most likely won't be able to get accurate estimates of the true Cd in this method since it would be difficult to determine the rolling resistance of the car at the speeds tested, but we should at least be able to get comparative values. Any ideas on how we could accurately estimate the rolling resistance at around 70 or 80 mph would be welcome! Thanks again for all your help, I'll keep in touch!

-Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post May 17 2006, 02:07 PM
Post #15


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



Alot of variables in rolling resistance too.
Tire width and compound. Air pressure in tires
Bearing adjustment.
Brake rotor trueness (pads can drag on warped rotors). Speacially on the back.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TonyAKAVW
post May 17 2006, 02:45 PM
Post #16


That's my ride.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,151
Joined: 17-January 03
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Member No.: 166
Region Association: None



QUOTE
Mike and doing an aerodynamics research project at the University of California, San Diego


Go Tritons!

-Tony (EE c/o 2000)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
newto914s
post May 17 2006, 04:05 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 561
Joined: 16-February 04
From: Thornton, CO
Member No.: 1,663



QUOTE(URY914 @ May 17 2006, 07:18 AM) *

QUOTE(Brad Roberts @ May 16 2006, 10:59 PM) *

72 914: 0.37 73 is 0.38


B


Must be the tits on the front bumper? I wouldn't think they would make that much diff. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)


You ever watch "Baywatch." tits slow thinks down a lot (IMG:style_emoticons/default/boldblue.gif)
But I'm not complaning
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Al Meredith
post May 18 2006, 06:03 AM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 960
Joined: 4-November 04
From: Atlanta, ga
Member No.: 3,061



I knew I had this old PANO took a while to find it. I have no way to scan the article , but if someone goes to Panorama May 1978 there is a great article about Weissach Engineering. There are pages of graphs showing everything from "lift at ther rear wheels at differing speeds with and without spoilers : to: CD of a 914 in all configurations. As stated before .363 closed up, .380 lamps up, .381 lamps down windows open, .389 lamps down windows up and roof off, .447 windows open and roof off lights down, .464 all dirtyed up (windows open roof off and lights up.

If someone has May 78 please scan ....good info Al
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ryap
post Oct 11 2006, 04:41 PM
Post #19


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-July 06
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 6,465



All the drag coefficient info is nice to have, but it doesn't do you any good unless you know the reference area! Anybody know what that is? I assume it is the projected frontal area. Difficult to measure without a planometer. My rough guess is 23 sq. ft.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Oct 11 2006, 05:27 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



the guy who had the vortex generators was Greg (race914) Braun. I met him at Laguna Seca a few weeks ago. He told me that he really likes the vortex generators. He liked them so much he put a bunch on the back of his trailer to improve gas mileage!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 10:44 PM