Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> MPS: Why couldn't we do this..., a theorectical question
drewvw
post Jun 29 2006, 08:55 AM
Post #1


new england car guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,631
Joined: 24-February 06
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 5,630
Region Association: North East States



Was just talking to evil about a potential replacement for the MPS and came up with the following question:


Is it possible to replace the MPS with some sort of chip / solid state component that emulates the readings that the MPS gives off throughout the range, but is instead driven by engine RPM, throttle position, etc?

If that wouldn't work, why?


I don't pretend to know much about djet, but it dawned on me that I could program a chip that maps various readings to the rpm range. Might take a bit to get the curve right for part throttle response but...is it doable?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 9)
Demick
post Jun 29 2006, 08:58 AM
Post #2


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



Not a new concept. Just nobody knows how to do it - yet. Hopefully someone will figure it out. But it isn't simple by any means. Read the last few posts of this thread:

mps thread
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Jun 29 2006, 08:58 AM
Post #3


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



Megasquirt?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
drewvw
post Jun 29 2006, 09:00 AM
Post #4


new england car guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,631
Joined: 24-February 06
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 5,630
Region Association: North East States





I'm sure its been discussed many times over the years, the conversation evil and I were having just got me thinking.

Being a programmer, I think I could build something that could do this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Thack
post Jun 29 2006, 09:02 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 283
Joined: 1-June 05
From: Houston, Tx
Member No.: 4,182



For one the fuel required is measured by need/load. When you have your foot to the floor, the chip would not know how much fuel is required because the rpms do not immediately rise with the throttle opening. You could design it that way if you changed a few other things.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
drewvw
post Jun 29 2006, 09:10 AM
Post #6


new england car guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,631
Joined: 24-February 06
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 5,630
Region Association: North East States





I see what your saying Thack. I revised my original post to include throttle position as an input as well....


stamping a basic chip to do something like this is not tough to do at all...finding the correct algorithim for the output however...




User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Thack
post Jun 29 2006, 09:20 AM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 283
Joined: 1-June 05
From: Houston, Tx
Member No.: 4,182



It sounds like you are on the right track. Maybe you can develop what you can and then someone else can come up with the engine vaccuum interpolation. Because when you go uphill and need more fuel to maintain speed that has to be addressed also.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
drewvw
post Jun 29 2006, 09:22 AM
Post #8


new england car guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,631
Joined: 24-February 06
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 5,630
Region Association: North East States





yeah exactly, that was the piece I was missing. You need to measure load somehow...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KenH
post Jun 29 2006, 09:55 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 680
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Gilroy, CA
Member No.: 156



MAP sensor to measure vacuum as the MPS does.

Software to convert MAP data to match MPS info. This is not a linear curve. Need a different curve for each of the 3 MPS.

Interface to "Brain" that looks like the MPS output inductor.

Ken

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Jun 29 2006, 09:56 AM
Post #10


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



Read my blog. One of the earlier posts discusses this. The short version is that by the time to put together the electronics to emulate the MPS, you're 90% of the way to a full fuel ECU, so you might as well just spend the much smaller amount of money on a Megasquirt, which uses a solid-state pressure sensor, and thus doesn't need the MPS.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 01:43 AM