Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> i smell 4 bucks per gallon..., top off your tanks now.
lotus_65
post Aug 7 2006, 05:16 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,608
Joined: 21-March 05
From: minneapolis, mn
Member No.: 3,795
Region Association: Northstar Region



prudhoe bay shutdown

... another great excuse to (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sheeplove.gif) the consumers...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
STL914
post Aug 7 2006, 05:42 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,180
Joined: 22-October 03
From: O'Fallon, MO
Member No.: 1,271
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Last week, gas prices jumped $.35 over night to $3.19/gal, but only a few stations
made the leap. Several stayed at $2.86 and by noon, the price settled to $3.07. They must have got their wires crossed and thought the Alaskan facility was going down last week.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
swl
post Aug 7 2006, 06:41 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,409
Joined: 7-August 05
From: Kingston,On,Canada
Member No.: 4,550
Region Association: Canada



In Canada we have always had higher gas prices than the US because of taxes. But on my trip down east (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia) I was seeing $1.20/litre. A litre is almost exactly a US quart so you can call it $4.80Cdn/gallon. Currency exchange brings that to about $4.10/gallon.

The kicker? New Brunswick gov't recently stepped in to regulate gas prices. They wanted to stop the wild swings in gas prices. The result - they get screwed all the time rather than just some of the time.

Got back to Ontario and the prices were fluctuating between $1.00 and $1.10

Somehow I don't think this is ever going to get better. In five years we will be looking at $1.00/litre and laughing that gas was ever that cheap.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LongARM
post Aug 7 2006, 07:01 AM
Post #4


it's better to burn-out , then it is to rust
**

Group: Members
Posts: 222
Joined: 6-March 05
From: Kingston Ontario Canada
Member No.: 3,720



i paid $1.31(CDN) for Sunoco 94 octane, just because it was hot outside(Thats what the clerk said)..........

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/sheeplove.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
IanStott
post Aug 7 2006, 07:25 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 226
Joined: 13-June 04
From: Moncton,New Brunswick,Canada
Member No.: 2,199



We are only now paying what I paid in the late seventies in Germany, Italy was even more. The days of cheap gas are gone and will never return, fortunately I happen to have economical cars that still perform very well. After looking at Jakes latest results for fuel economy we should all be lining up to protect him from being gobbled up by some big corporation!!

Ian Stott
Moncton

PS. Price regulation by the government is stupid, it is ineffective plus it adds to the price due to admin. costs. I really get ticked off when well meaning people try to mess with a free market, 99 percent of the time they only make it worse. I guess it helps them get elected. I am now paying $1.30 litre for high test, which is only 91 octane here. BY the way a US gallon is 4 litre's, a Canadian or Imperial gallon is 4.55 litre's.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
swl
post Aug 7 2006, 07:27 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,409
Joined: 7-August 05
From: Kingston,On,Canada
Member No.: 4,550
Region Association: Canada



OUCH!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
davep
post Aug 7 2006, 08:13 AM
Post #7


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,138
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



A fellow on another list says the price of gas in southern England was the equivalent of $2.25 Canadian per liter, so double what we are paying. Strangely enough, his handle is Lotus 15.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PRS914-6
post Aug 7 2006, 08:52 AM
Post #8


Excellence Magazine Project 914 3.6
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,278
Joined: 20-May 06
From: Central California
Member No.: 6,031
Region Association: None



I'm sure I'll get flamed for this but I think we as Americans have had it easy for a long time. The rest of the world has been paying double what we have for years. There is a very easy way to get gas prices to drop. Stop driving big SUV's and gas guzzling cars. If we all did, there would be such a glut of gas, the prices would drop like a rock (for the entire world economy)

When I drive down a California freeway and every other vehicle is an extended cab pickup or a Ford Expedition, I do not have pity for us. We chose to live this way and I won't blame the oil companies for making money. It's simply supply and demand and profit. Personally, I don't want to pay either, but $4-$5.00 a gallon would solve the problem. People would finally start driving economical cars, gas usage would drop, fuel inventories would go up and prices would fall.

Take a trip to Europe, 90% drive small economical cars and lot's of motorcycles. Here, eonomical is a small SUV and a full dress Harley Davidson.

The solution is ours, we just don't want to give up the luxury...........We never will until we are forced to........
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cooltimes
post Aug 7 2006, 09:23 AM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,508
Joined: 18-May 04
Member No.: 2,081
Region Association: None



I don't think it matters what we drive based on fuel prices in the historical past of Europeans who traditionally have always driven smaller and more economically pruden cars. Strange as it seems, most cars where price of fuel is extremely high to begin with are the ones that are very economical and the government has tacked on high taxes to overcome the lack of taxable fuel burned. Go Figure.
It's just a matter of who controls the oil per barrel market and we all are seeing exactly who that is without going into the politics we dunk our heads into the sand about in this particular arena of car buffs. Not a place to discuss until the damage is done and well entrenched seems silly since this is also a part of owning a 914.
If anyone thinks this post is political, speak up. I will delete the post.

MikeCool

QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ Aug 7 2006, 09:52 AM) *

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this but I think we as Americans have had it easy for a long time. The rest of the world has been paying double what we have for years. There is a very easy way to get gas prices to drop. Stop driving big SUV's and gas guzzling cars. If we all did, there would be such a glut of gas, the prices would drop like a rock (for the entire world economy)

When I drive down a California freeway and every other vehicle is an extended cab pickup or a Ford Expedition, I do not have pity for us. We chose to live this way and I won't blame the oil companies for making money. It's simply supply and demand and profit. Personally, I don't want to pay either, but $4-$5.00 a gallon would solve the problem. People would finally start driving economical cars, gas usage would drop, fuel inventories would go up and prices would fall.

Take a trip to Europe, 90% drive small economical cars and lot's of motorcycles. Here, eonomical is a small SUV and a full dress Harley Davidson.

The solution is ours, we just don't want to give up the luxury...........We never will until we are forced to........
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Aug 7 2006, 09:28 AM
Post #10


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(PRS914-6 @ Aug 7 2006, 07:52 AM) *

I'm sure I'll get flamed for this but I think we as Americans have had it easy for a long time. The rest of the world has been paying double what we have for years. There is a very easy way to get gas prices to drop. Stop driving big SUV's and gas guzzling cars. If we all did, there would be such a glut of gas, the prices would drop like a rock (for the entire world economy)

When I drive down a California freeway and every other vehicle is an extended cab pickup or a Ford Expedition, I do not have pity for us. We chose to live this way and I won't blame the oil companies for making money. It's simply supply and demand and profit. Personally, I don't want to pay either, but $4-$5.00 a gallon would solve the problem. People would finally start driving economical cars, gas usage would drop, fuel inventories would go up and prices would fall.

Take a trip to Europe, 90% drive small economical cars and lot's of motorcycles. Here, eonomical is a small SUV and a full dress Harley Davidson.

The solution is ours, we just don't want to give up the luxury...........We never will until we are forced to........



and companies like GM has not helped at all....they should be ashamed of thier $1.99 gas deal on vehicles like the H2 with unlimited miles during the offer (why don't they just come out and say it public "Screw the limited oil supply, just buy a GM vehicle cause we need the money right now"

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bigbohr
post Aug 7 2006, 10:44 AM
Post #11


Superlurker
**

Group: Members
Posts: 224
Joined: 19-September 03
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 1,176



Crap, you all make me feel bad now working on my 914 V8 project.
Maybe I should switch to a 914 Hybrid version ... where shall I put the battery packs? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bigbohr
post Aug 7 2006, 10:59 AM
Post #12


Superlurker
**

Group: Members
Posts: 224
Joined: 19-September 03
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 1,176



Besides the disruptions, what worries me too is the rising price of developing oil & gas fields ... and we need to do that continuously. The big rigs used to develop big offshore fields are now $500,000/day, up from about $150,000/day 2 years ago. And the rest of the prices follows the same trend. Drilling on these deep offshore fields costs about $750,000/day now. I'm sure this won't make you feel sorry for the oil companies and that's not the point here. The problem is that most of them still do their economics based on lower oil prices (like $35-45 per barrel). So right now all companies are trying to increase their production by buying other companies (they all have wads of cash anyway). That doesn't increase the total output though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tdgray
post Aug 7 2006, 11:03 AM
Post #13


Thank God Nemo is not here to see this
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,705
Joined: 5-August 03
From: Akron, OH
Member No.: 984
Region Association: None



Mike(Cool)... I don't think that was political at all. Keep it there.

One thing though. When comparing US to Euro (or Canada) you have to keep in mind that approx 66% of the price is taxes. Back that out and the cost is comparable to US prices.

Second thing. Oil is a commodity. Therefore it is subject to price speculation, influence etc. In recent financial times, it has become a haven for banks and investment houses to mitigate the effect of the underperformance of large cap stocks. Basically making the price more artificial than before. We all pay for this.

Lastly, what PRS stated is true and right on the money. Until we stop purchasing the gas guzzlers and demand that the car companies make fuel efficient cars, not hybrids or EV's, real fuel efficient cars we have only ourselves to blame. Although I will not put myself in that category. I have always driven small fuel efficient cars and always will. I don't see wasting money on those stupid oversized station wagons. Vote with your dollars people, save the speeches.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smontanaro
post Aug 7 2006, 11:05 AM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,190
Joined: 3-June 05
From: Evanston, IL
Member No.: 4,197
Region Association: Upper MidWest



There was a very interesting special report in the 7/29 Chicago Tribune:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/special...1&cset=true

Skip
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post Aug 7 2006, 11:07 AM
Post #15


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(IanStott @ Aug 7 2006, 06:25 AM) *

After looking at Jakes latest results for fuel economy we should all be lining up to protect him from being gobbled up by some big corporation!!

Ian Stott
Moncton


What are Jakes latest results for fuel econonomy? Jake Raby? Please explain!

I am pretty close to starting a thread asking about modifications and tuning to achieve 40+ mpg with a 1.7. I know Joe Sharp has claimed 49 mpg with a teener. I think a few simple aero mods, larger diam tires, timing adjust, and other tweaks (what are they?) could really help.

SUVs suck for daily drivers! Small sports cars rule! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smontanaro
post Aug 7 2006, 11:16 AM
Post #16


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,190
Joined: 3-June 05
From: Evanston, IL
Member No.: 4,197
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(ChrisNPDrider @ Aug 7 2006, 12:07 PM) *

I know Joe Sharp has claimed 49 mpg with a teener. I think a few simple aero mods, larger diam tires, timing adjust, and other tweaks ...


If you change the diameter of your tires you'll either need to recalibrate your odometer or use some external source for measuring mileage...

Skip
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Aug 7 2006, 11:31 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750



QUOTE(lotus_65 @ Aug 7 2006, 04:16 AM) *

prudhoe bay shutdown

... another great excuse to (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sheeplove.gif) the consumers...




Maybe not in the pure classic sense, but certainty in reality, the oil market is operating like a monopoly.

If the US government threatened to break up the oil companies, like they did telecommunications years ago, what do you think would happen to the price of gas?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Aug 7 2006, 11:43 AM
Post #18


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE
What are Jakes latest results for fuel econonomy? Jake Raby? Please explain!


I have been able to squeeze 38 average out of the 912E with a recent tune up, and it has 100K miles on it. At times I have gotten over 40 MPG out of it before when it had lower miles. I can say that drianing out the 21,000 mile oil (went that far on one oil change) was good for a solid 5 MPG! Before i spent a solid day servicing it I was down to 27 MPG at best, but it had been neglected since 2003 with hardly anything done to it...

This week I am finishing my wiife's "Super 2 Liter+" for her beetle vert... The first one did so well that I decided to boost this one and see what we could get mileage wise under nomal driving conditions with a female driver and about 200 ponies..

I have been witholding many of my results with the "Super 2 Liter" project engines simply because most of them have been unbelievable thus far.

A local TV station in Atlanta got word of it and has been on my ass to do an interview, but I could care less...

I am working to decrease the cost of these higher MPG engines, right now they are the most expensive thing in my line up, even more than a sub 2.8L engine-
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Aug 7 2006, 11:44 AM
Post #19


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE
What are Jakes latest results for fuel econonomy? Jake Raby? Please explain!


I have been able to squeeze 38 average out of the 912E with a recent tune up, and it has 100K miles on it. At times I have gotten over 40 MPG out of it before when it had lower miles. I can say that drianing out the 21,000 mile oil (went that far on one oil change) was good for a solid 5 MPG! Before i spent a solid day servicing it I was down to 27 MPG at best, but it had been neglected since 2003 with hardly anything done to it...

This week I am finishing my wiife's "Super 2 Liter+" for her beetle vert... The first one did so well that I decided to boost this one and see what we could get mileage wise under nomal driving conditions with a female driver and about 200 ponies..

I have been witholding many of my results with the "Super 2 Liter" project engines simply because most of them have been unbelievable thus far.

A local TV station in Atlanta got word of it and has been on my ass to do an interview, but I could care less...

I am working to decrease the cost of these higher MPG engines, right now they are the most expensive thing in my line up, even more than a sub 2.8L engine-
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
turboman808
post Aug 7 2006, 11:49 AM
Post #20


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,718
Joined: 31-January 06
From: North Jersey
Member No.: 5,505
Region Association: North East States



Great!!! Get off my roads (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Actualy I kinda came to my senses and will probably lease a new scion xa soon. Sick of having to work on cars all the time and hey the mileage in the xa isn't bad. Cheap transport.

I really want a VW lupo but they don't sell it here. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th May 2024 - 06:57 AM