Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 914/901 LSD compatibility with 915 and, more bloody output flange questions
kdfoust
post Aug 7 2006, 09:00 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 694
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Riverside
Member No.: 71
Region Association: Southern California



So I used the search function and think I figured this out...

I'm planning to order an LSD (torsen type) tomorrow for my 914 tranny. This will go in the car with the current 914 tranny for a few months and then be swapped to a 915 tranny when I convert. I want to maximize the compatibility of the LSD and that leads to my question. Should I order it with "coarse" or "fine" splines for the output flanges? From browsing the pertinent threads it seems that "coarse" is early 901/915/914 and "fine" is late 915. Does that sound right? To further complicate my question I will be converting the car to 5-bolt hubs around the same time the 915 goes in. To do that I'd use the famous 944 output flange/CV trick which is based on 914 output flanges which are "coarse" spline?

So I'm thinking that I order "coarse" splines for the output flanges. This works as a no-brainer with the stock CVs and axles for today. Then when I convert to 5 bolt I go with 944 output flanges and CVs...right?

Whew. On right track here?

Regards,
Kevin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
john rogers
post Aug 7 2006, 09:12 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,525
Joined: 4-March 03
From: Chula Vista CA
Member No.: 391



If it were me, I would wait until I get the 915 tranny later on and then get the limited slip. That way there would be nooooo chance of getting it wrong!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John
post Aug 7 2006, 09:28 PM
Post #3


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



I would agree with Mr. Rogers. (That sounds strange)

Anyway, I believe that the 901 and the 915 spool is not interchangable and that you would be better off doing the limited slip in the 915 and not worry about the 901. If you are pushing the 901 with your 3.2 hard enough to need the limited slip, you will destroy the tranny anyway. (we broke 4th gears out of several boxes before going 915 and this was without limited slip)

I think that light to moderate street use will allow the 901 to last a long time on the street. I think that external cooling and gear stack spraybars will help 901 gearboxes live a longer life.

The torque of the 3.2 coupled with the stresses of track events, spell doom for the 901 gearboxes (and quite possibly 915's as well). There is reason that Porsche swapped to the 915 with the 2.4 liter and then the g50 in the 3.2 liter cars.....

just my $0.02
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
xitspd
post Aug 7 2006, 09:47 PM
Post #4


Technology and Tradition 3.6 and 914-6
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,305
Joined: 17-November 04
From: Foothills of Mt. San Jacinto, CA
Member No.: 3,136



We have done several FACTORY 915 LSD's to 901 Tran's over the years and it is not an easy task. Never a 901 LSD to a 915 Trans. Wait and go with the 915 LSD when you make your change!

Dan
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th May 2024 - 03:41 PM