Motor choices..., Too many options!! |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Motor choices..., Too many options!! |
anthony |
Oct 13 2006, 10:29 AM
Post
#21
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218 |
I disagree. The stock fuel injection system works fine for a stock engine. The problem is when you want to go for more power because the stock system isn't programmable.
We already have EFI replacements - there are lots to choose from. The most popular are Megasquirt and SDS. Jake even sells an SDS configured system that is a drop in replacement for your D-jet. |
Aaron Cox |
Oct 13 2006, 10:31 AM
Post
#22
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
To actually answer your question it looks like a 2165 would be a 94x78 so a stroked 2.0 liter. I haven't heard of one before. It should have good torque. Why not go to a 2176 with a 78.4 stroke? I assume you are going to try and save $$$ by reusing the 94mm p&c. Mostly you hear of 2056 and 2270 which are 96 bore and 71mm (stock2.0) or 78.4 stroke respectively. You can find different combinations you could make here: Type IV Engine Displacement Bore vs. Stroke yep you gain an extra ~90CC by upping the pistons to 96's (AND you get waaay more options in piston land inthe 96mm variety) with a 78.4 stroke..... |
JmuRiz |
Oct 13 2006, 10:47 AM
Post
#23
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,434 Joined: 30-December 02 From: NoVA Member No.: 50 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
So far I've seen/heard/read about the 2056 and 2270 type 4 motors. What about the 2165? What bore/stroke combo would this be? Are you looking for a motor for an under 2.2 class? If so, go with what Matt said, 2176cc If not, just go with whatever your budget will allow, a 2056 and a 2270 are the most popular and most tested combos. Check out the 2056 engine for $5000 thread on the products forum. |
TJB/914 |
Oct 13 2006, 11:06 AM
Post
#24
|
Mid-Engn. Group: Members Posts: 4,336 Joined: 24-February 03 From: Plymouth & Petoskey, MI Member No.: 346 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Anthony,
You are so correct our F.I. system is ok for a stock motor. I should have added I want a new programable F.I. system to work with my modified motor. I want a plug & play reasonable $$ system replacement. Until I am satisified with the current systems, I'll wait. I just want to pay the money without the hassel. I like my 4-cyl motor, I just want a better F.I. system to handle improvements. A motor is a motor we just need a better F.I. system (plug & play for the novice). Tom |
rtalich |
Oct 13 2006, 11:08 AM
Post
#25
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 25-September 06 From: Bellevue, WA Member No.: 6,913 Region Association: None |
Thank you all for the info!! Very helpful.... Is it correct to say that if you were to install a stroked crank then you also need to replace the stock rods? If thats the case then it would make sense to use the 96mm pistons. Therefore, its very clear why you just don't see anything in between the 2056 and 2270. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)
|
Mueller |
Oct 13 2006, 11:28 AM
Post
#26
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
To actually answer your question it looks like a 2165 would be a 94x78 so a stroked 2.0 liter. I haven't heard of one before. I was building this combo until I had to sell the motor, the idea behind using the 94mm bore was not for money savings considering I had 94mm Nickies (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) The reason was that I had freshly rebuilt 2.0 heads and that normally one goes with larger valves with a 2270, so by keeping the smaller bore, the intake/exhaust ports would be a better match to the smaller bore. It should have good torque. Why not go to a 2176 with a 78.4 stroke? I assume you are going to try and save $$$ by reusing the 94mm p&c. Mostly you hear of 2056 and 2270 which are 96 bore and 71mm (stock2.0) or 78.4 stroke respectively. I totally agree with you hear, not many people except for freaks like myself and Rich build up motors based on the 1.8 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) You can find different combinations you could make here: Type IV Engine Displacement Bore vs. Stroke |
Aaron Cox |
Oct 13 2006, 11:32 AM
Post
#27
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
Anthony, You are so correct our F.I. system is ok for a stock motor. I should have added I want a new programable F.I. system to work with my modified motor. I want a plug & play reasonable $$ system replacement. Until I am satisified with the current systems, I'll wait. I just want to pay the money without the hassel. I like my 4-cyl motor, I just want a better F.I. system to handle improvements. A motor is a motor we just need a better F.I. system (plug & play for the novice). Tom if you just bolt it on.... and drive away.... you dont learn anything PEFI is a wonderful thing, and can teach you a lot.. im saving for an ITB / FI hotrod induction system... why? because it will make more power and teach me in the process. |
TJB/914 |
Oct 13 2006, 12:02 PM
Post
#28
|
Mid-Engn. Group: Members Posts: 4,336 Joined: 24-February 03 From: Plymouth & Petoskey, MI Member No.: 346 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Aaron,
Good info & advise. I did a Google search on F.I. systems & it's a big place. How about someone making a list of available F.I. Systems to review with web sites for us novice 914er's?? Thanks, Tom |
Allan |
Oct 13 2006, 12:16 PM
Post
#29
|
Teenerless Weenie Group: Members Posts: 8,373 Joined: 5-July 04 From: Western Mesopotamia Member No.: 2,304 Region Association: Southern California |
|
anthony |
Oct 13 2006, 06:04 PM
Post
#30
|
2270 club Group: Benefactors Posts: 3,107 Joined: 1-February 03 From: SF Bay Area, CA Member No.: 218 |
Thomas, Jake seels an SDS based system that is as close to a bolt on for an existing D-Jet setup as you can get.
http://www.aircooledtechnology.com/store/p...=320&page=1 Still, it's $1500 bucks so it's not cheap. A set up Webers though with everything costs around $1200 so at least one is still in the same ballpark. The only way to do this on a budget is with Megasquirt which requires a lot of sweat equity. |
bernbomb914 |
Oct 13 2006, 11:49 PM
Post
#31
|
one of the oldest Farts on this board Group: Benefactors Posts: 1,873 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Temecula, CA Member No.: 36 |
my new project is 78x104 nickasils it should be interesting to see the results.
Bernie |
Bleyseng |
Oct 14 2006, 08:18 AM
Post
#32
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,035 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
my new project is 78x104 nickasils it should be interesting to see the results. Bernie thats kinda small ain't it? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
JPB |
Oct 14 2006, 09:12 AM
Post
#33
|
The Crimson Rocket smiles in your general direction. Group: Members Posts: 2,927 Joined: 12-November 05 From: Tapmahamock, Va. Member No.: 5,107 |
I think it is possible to get dependable 170-300Hps for under 5k and one month of pittering during the weekends and be done with it.
:beer1:Not talking 6 here. |
brant |
Oct 14 2006, 10:28 AM
Post
#34
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,639 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
|
Bleyseng |
Oct 14 2006, 10:41 AM
Post
#35
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,035 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
me too.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
|
JPB |
Oct 14 2006, 10:49 AM
Post
#36
|
The Crimson Rocket smiles in your general direction. Group: Members Posts: 2,927 Joined: 12-November 05 From: Tapmahamock, Va. Member No.: 5,107 |
Sorry not T4 but 4 and not 6 and didn't mention 8 since 4 8 6 and 8.LOL
:beer1:Ahhh, keeping beer money a priority also. |
rhodyguy |
Oct 14 2006, 11:20 AM
Post
#37
|
Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out. Group: Members Posts: 22,090 Joined: 2-March 03 From: Orion's Bell. The BELL! Member No.: 378 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
like we talked about rob. 2.0 or 2056 or 2270 or carbs or d-jet or aftermarket fi. your call. decide before you start ordering components.
k |
Bleyseng |
Oct 14 2006, 11:47 AM
Post
#38
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,035 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
No Way!
Let him stock up on a bunch of mis-matched mis-configured parts so later we can swoop in like vultures to buy it up at a 75% discount!!! I can hardly wait.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif) I love those kind of deals. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) |
rtalich |
Oct 14 2006, 12:03 PM
Post
#39
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 25-September 06 From: Bellevue, WA Member No.: 6,913 Region Association: None |
No Way! Let him stock up on a bunch of mis-matched mis-configured parts so later we can swoop in like vultures to buy it up at a 75% discount!!! I can hardly wait.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif) I love those kind of deals. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/WTF.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pissoff.gif) I'm not talking about mixing and matching parts here.... Just simply trying to figure out why theres no mention of a type 4 motor in between the 2056 and 2270. When in theory it can be done with specific components. |
Bleyseng |
Oct 14 2006, 12:12 PM
Post
#40
|
Aircooled Baby! Group: Members Posts: 13,035 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Seattle, Washington (for now) Member No.: 24 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
like the 2165 or whatever the "Powerstroke" is?
914 is pretty light so "if" you are going to stroke it, go as large as possible. The 2056 is sooo easy to do its foolproof that the factory "should have" built the 914 2.0L with this 110hp version and "kicked ass" in sales. 2270 is harder and above that get alot harder. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th June 2024 - 09:35 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |