Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 914 Stats, Does anyone know?
vitaminc914
post Jan 1 2007, 03:24 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 4-July 05
From: Allendale, MI
Member No.: 4,374
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I am curious, does anyone know if Road & Track or Car & Driver ever did a 0-60, top speed, handling, braking test on a 73 or 74 2.0? I am curious what the results were.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
smg914
post Jan 1 2007, 04:52 PM
Post #2


Sahara Beige Steve
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 22-February 04
From: Tampa, FL
Member No.: 1,695
Region Association: None



Car and Driver 1973:
0-60 - 9.0 sec.
Top Speed - 113mph observed
Braking 70-0 - 197 feet

Road & Track 1973:
0-60 - 10.3 sec.
Top Speed - 119 mph
Braking 60-0 - 186 feet
Braking 80-0 - 285 feet
Lateral acceleration - 0.742g

Road Test magazine 1973:
0-60 - 10.6 sec.
Top Speed - 115 mph
Braking 60-0 - 148 feet

Road Test magazine 1974:
0-60 - 10.7 sec.
Top Speed - ?
Braking 60-0 - 160 feet
Lateral Acceleration - 0.740g

Driving magazine:
0-60 - 10.3 sec.
Top Speed - ?
Braking 60-0 - 144 feet
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pat Garvey
post Jan 1 2007, 08:40 PM
Post #3


Do I or don't I...........?
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,899
Joined: 24-March 06
From: SE PA, near Philly
Member No.: 5,765
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(smg914 @ Jan 1 2007, 07:52 PM) *

Car and Driver 1973:
0-60 - 9.0 sec.
Top Speed - 113mph observed
Braking 70-0 - 197 feet

Road & Track 1973:
0-60 - 10.3 sec.
Top Speed - 119 mph
Braking 60-0 - 186 feet
Braking 80-0 - 285 feet
Lateral acceleration - 0.742g

Road Test magazine 1973:
0-60 - 10.6 sec.
Top Speed - 115 mph
Braking 60-0 - 148 feet

Road Test magazine 1974:
0-60 - 10.7 sec.
Top Speed - ?
Braking 60-0 - 160 feet
Lateral Acceleration - 0.740g

Driving magazine:
0-60 - 10.3 sec.
Top Speed - ?
Braking 60-0 - 144 feet

Wow - more than 40 feet difference in 60-0 braking! That's like stopping before you hit a semi trailer, or before you enter the cab! What's with that? Not that thse are bad stats, but they are hugely different.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dflesburg
post Jan 1 2007, 09:21 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,720
Joined: 6-April 04
From: Warm and Cheerful Centerville Ohio
Member No.: 1,896
Region Association: None



10 seconds? Oh yeah, thats why I spent over 13 years putting a 3.2 motor in my car... I knew there was a reason...

I just forgot.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jan 1 2007, 10:10 PM
Post #5


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,442
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Pat Garvey @ Jan 1 2007, 09:40 PM) *

QUOTE(smg914 @ Jan 1 2007, 07:52 PM) *

Words words words...

Wow - more than 40 feet difference in 60-0 braking! That's like stopping before you hit a semi trailer, or before you enter the cab! What's with that? Not that thse are bad stats, but they are hugely different.


Different dirivers. Different road conditions. Different tires. Different testing location. Brakes hotter or colder. Different test car. One car may have had a co-driver. Etc.

Too many variables not mentioned that would all make big differences in test distance.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Hammy
post Jan 1 2007, 11:55 PM
Post #6


mr. Wonderful
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,826
Joined: 20-October 04
From: Columbia, California
Member No.: 2,978
Region Association: Northern California



I'm assuming those 0 to 60's are all 2 liters.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
vitaminc914
post Jan 2 2007, 07:46 PM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 30
Joined: 4-July 05
From: Allendale, MI
Member No.: 4,374
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I am always amazed at how these cars were so ahead of their times. Think about it. 4 wheel disc brakes, Electronic Fuel Injection, Independent rear suspension, Hallogen Bulbs, 5 speed, 15" wheels, seat belt tensioners and sensors. A lot of cars those days did not even have these options on their drawing tables. I just find it fascinating.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mid_Engine_914
post Jan 2 2007, 10:56 PM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 195
Joined: 22-September 06
From: Left Coast
Member No.: 6,888



Here are some more useful stats.



(IMG:http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/1732/914dataaugust2005issueowh9.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th May 2024 - 06:09 AM